Assessing the Social-ecological Resilience of Organic Farmers in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand

Since resilience is continuing to make its rise to the top of the sustainable development policies, monitoring resilience has become critical because it provides stakeholders with practical actions that can strengthen the state of adaptability to cope with all kinds of change. In this study, resili...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chaiteera Panpakdee, Budsara Limnirankul, Prathanthip Kramol
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Hasanuddin University 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/23604982139249cfb89e264b94ec367d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:23604982139249cfb89e264b94ec367d
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:23604982139249cfb89e264b94ec367d2021-11-25T17:51:55ZAssessing the Social-ecological Resilience of Organic Farmers in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand10.24259/fs.v5i2.132682549-47242549-4333https://doaj.org/article/23604982139249cfb89e264b94ec367d2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/fs/article/view/13268https://doaj.org/toc/2549-4724https://doaj.org/toc/2549-4333 Since resilience is continuing to make its rise to the top of the sustainable development policies, monitoring resilience has become critical because it provides stakeholders with practical actions that can strengthen the state of adaptability to cope with all kinds of change. In this study, resilience, and social theories, such as grounded theory and technography, were integrated as a conceptual framework to produce a specific set of indicators, which yielded forty-seven indices, called social-ecological resilience indicators (SERIs). This study attempts to manage the temporal and spatial scales of resilience systems and to make such indicators suitable for organic rice production systems in four districts of Chiang Mai Province. A questionnaire was utilized to survey fifty-three organic farmers, and the results of the descriptive data analysis indicated that 0.54 (1.00 = the maximum) had been the respondents’ average score. Meanwhile, the highest and the lowest scores were serially 0.69 and 0.40. In addition, the findings revealed that Kendall’s Tau-b rank correlation’s numeric value came closer to +, which meant that the respondents had demonstrated an average tendency to be resilient. Generally, the highest score of resilience existed for those organic farmers, who had been outstanding in creating opportunities for self-organization, such as considerably relying on food and farm materials from the availability of local resources. Moreover, the majority of them were found to have a secondary on-farm profession that was not only subsidizing additional incomes but was also providing new knowledge and opportunities. This contrasted with the group with lowest score. The farmers, who exhibited unsatisfactory resilience, were centralized in dimensions, ranging from a having a lack of diverse water sources to having sufficient competency to exploit the benefits of Information and Communication Technology (ICT). They are, therefore, more prone to being affected by negative pressures. It is recommended that for building resilience, the ‘holy grail’ is boosting self-reliance. This capacity is key to reducing the risk of losing sustenance and enabling stakeholders to apply the appropriate strategies in times of change Chaiteera PanpakdeeBudsara LimnirankulPrathanthip KramolHasanuddin UniversityarticleAssessing resiliencebuilding resilienceorganic riceresilience indicatorssocial-ecological resilienceForestrySD1-669.5Environmental sciencesGE1-350EcologyQH540-549.5ENForest and Society, Vol 5, Iss 2 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Assessing resilience
building resilience
organic rice
resilience indicators
social-ecological resilience
Forestry
SD1-669.5
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle Assessing resilience
building resilience
organic rice
resilience indicators
social-ecological resilience
Forestry
SD1-669.5
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Chaiteera Panpakdee
Budsara Limnirankul
Prathanthip Kramol
Assessing the Social-ecological Resilience of Organic Farmers in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand
description Since resilience is continuing to make its rise to the top of the sustainable development policies, monitoring resilience has become critical because it provides stakeholders with practical actions that can strengthen the state of adaptability to cope with all kinds of change. In this study, resilience, and social theories, such as grounded theory and technography, were integrated as a conceptual framework to produce a specific set of indicators, which yielded forty-seven indices, called social-ecological resilience indicators (SERIs). This study attempts to manage the temporal and spatial scales of resilience systems and to make such indicators suitable for organic rice production systems in four districts of Chiang Mai Province. A questionnaire was utilized to survey fifty-three organic farmers, and the results of the descriptive data analysis indicated that 0.54 (1.00 = the maximum) had been the respondents’ average score. Meanwhile, the highest and the lowest scores were serially 0.69 and 0.40. In addition, the findings revealed that Kendall’s Tau-b rank correlation’s numeric value came closer to +, which meant that the respondents had demonstrated an average tendency to be resilient. Generally, the highest score of resilience existed for those organic farmers, who had been outstanding in creating opportunities for self-organization, such as considerably relying on food and farm materials from the availability of local resources. Moreover, the majority of them were found to have a secondary on-farm profession that was not only subsidizing additional incomes but was also providing new knowledge and opportunities. This contrasted with the group with lowest score. The farmers, who exhibited unsatisfactory resilience, were centralized in dimensions, ranging from a having a lack of diverse water sources to having sufficient competency to exploit the benefits of Information and Communication Technology (ICT). They are, therefore, more prone to being affected by negative pressures. It is recommended that for building resilience, the ‘holy grail’ is boosting self-reliance. This capacity is key to reducing the risk of losing sustenance and enabling stakeholders to apply the appropriate strategies in times of change
format article
author Chaiteera Panpakdee
Budsara Limnirankul
Prathanthip Kramol
author_facet Chaiteera Panpakdee
Budsara Limnirankul
Prathanthip Kramol
author_sort Chaiteera Panpakdee
title Assessing the Social-ecological Resilience of Organic Farmers in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand
title_short Assessing the Social-ecological Resilience of Organic Farmers in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand
title_full Assessing the Social-ecological Resilience of Organic Farmers in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand
title_fullStr Assessing the Social-ecological Resilience of Organic Farmers in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the Social-ecological Resilience of Organic Farmers in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand
title_sort assessing the social-ecological resilience of organic farmers in chiang mai province, thailand
publisher Hasanuddin University
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/23604982139249cfb89e264b94ec367d
work_keys_str_mv AT chaiteerapanpakdee assessingthesocialecologicalresilienceoforganicfarmersinchiangmaiprovincethailand
AT budsaralimnirankul assessingthesocialecologicalresilienceoforganicfarmersinchiangmaiprovincethailand
AT prathanthipkramol assessingthesocialecologicalresilienceoforganicfarmersinchiangmaiprovincethailand
_version_ 1718411910347489280