Impact of different training modalities on anthropometric and metabolic characteristics in overweight/obese subjects: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

<h4>Background</h4>The aim of this systematic review of randomized controlled trials was to compare the effects of aerobic training (AET), resistance training (RT), and combined aerobic and resistance training (CT) on anthropometric parameters, blood lipids, and cardiorespiratory fitness...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Lukas Schwingshackl, Sofia Dias, Barbara Strasser, Georg Hoffmann
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/2374e51579d94a9eb9d3fe77b8171e1a
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:2374e51579d94a9eb9d3fe77b8171e1a
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:2374e51579d94a9eb9d3fe77b8171e1a2021-11-18T08:41:37ZImpact of different training modalities on anthropometric and metabolic characteristics in overweight/obese subjects: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0082853https://doaj.org/article/2374e51579d94a9eb9d3fe77b8171e1a2013-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24358230/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>The aim of this systematic review of randomized controlled trials was to compare the effects of aerobic training (AET), resistance training (RT), and combined aerobic and resistance training (CT) on anthropometric parameters, blood lipids, and cardiorespiratory fitness in overweight and obese subjects.<h4>Methods</h4>Electronic searches for randomized controlled trials were performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Trial Register. Inclusion criteria were: Body Mass Index: ≥25 kg/m(2), 19+ years of age, supervised exercise training, and a minimum intervention period of 8 weeks. Anthropometric outcomes, blood lipids, and cardiorespiratory fitness parameters were included. Pooled effects were calculated by inverse-variance random effect pairwise meta-analyses and Bayesian random effects network meta-analyses.<h4>Findings</h4>15 trials enrolling 741 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to RT, AET resulted in a significantly more pronounced reduction of body weight [mean differences (MD): -1.15 kg, p = 0.04], waist circumference [MD: -1.10 cm, p = 0.004], and fat mass [MD: -1.15 kg, p = 0.001] respectively. RT was more effective than AET in improving lean body mass [MD: 1.26 kg, p<0.00001]. When comparing CT with RT, MD in change of body weight [MD: -2.03 kg, p<0.0001], waist circumference [MD: -1.57 cm, p = 0.0002], and fat mass [MD: -1.88 kg, p<0.00001] were all in favor of CT. Results from the network meta-analyses confirmed these findings.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Evidence from both pairwise and network meta-analyses suggests that CT is the most efficacious means to reduce anthropometric outcomes and should be recommended in the prevention and treatment of overweight, and obesity whenever possible.Lukas SchwingshacklSofia DiasBarbara StrasserGeorg HoffmannPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 8, Iss 12, p e82853 (2013)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Lukas Schwingshackl Sofia Dias Barbara Strasser Georg Hoffmann Impact of different training modalities on anthropometric and metabolic characteristics in overweight/obese subjects: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
description	<h4>Background</h4>The aim of this systematic review of randomized controlled trials was to compare the effects of aerobic training (AET), resistance training (RT), and combined aerobic and resistance training (CT) on anthropometric parameters, blood lipids, and cardiorespiratory fitness in overweight and obese subjects.<h4>Methods</h4>Electronic searches for randomized controlled trials were performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Trial Register. Inclusion criteria were: Body Mass Index: ≥25 kg/m(2), 19+ years of age, supervised exercise training, and a minimum intervention period of 8 weeks. Anthropometric outcomes, blood lipids, and cardiorespiratory fitness parameters were included. Pooled effects were calculated by inverse-variance random effect pairwise meta-analyses and Bayesian random effects network meta-analyses.<h4>Findings</h4>15 trials enrolling 741 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to RT, AET resulted in a significantly more pronounced reduction of body weight [mean differences (MD): -1.15 kg, p = 0.04], waist circumference [MD: -1.10 cm, p = 0.004], and fat mass [MD: -1.15 kg, p = 0.001] respectively. RT was more effective than AET in improving lean body mass [MD: 1.26 kg, p<0.00001]. When comparing CT with RT, MD in change of body weight [MD: -2.03 kg, p<0.0001], waist circumference [MD: -1.57 cm, p = 0.0002], and fat mass [MD: -1.88 kg, p<0.00001] were all in favor of CT. Results from the network meta-analyses confirmed these findings.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Evidence from both pairwise and network meta-analyses suggests that CT is the most efficacious means to reduce anthropometric outcomes and should be recommended in the prevention and treatment of overweight, and obesity whenever possible.
format	article
author	Lukas Schwingshackl Sofia Dias Barbara Strasser Georg Hoffmann
author_facet	Lukas Schwingshackl Sofia Dias Barbara Strasser Georg Hoffmann
author_sort	Lukas Schwingshackl
title	Impact of different training modalities on anthropometric and metabolic characteristics in overweight/obese subjects: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
title_short	Impact of different training modalities on anthropometric and metabolic characteristics in overweight/obese subjects: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
title_full	Impact of different training modalities on anthropometric and metabolic characteristics in overweight/obese subjects: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
title_fullStr	Impact of different training modalities on anthropometric and metabolic characteristics in overweight/obese subjects: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
title_full_unstemmed	Impact of different training modalities on anthropometric and metabolic characteristics in overweight/obese subjects: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
title_sort	impact of different training modalities on anthropometric and metabolic characteristics in overweight/obese subjects: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
publisher	Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate	2013
url	https://doaj.org/article/2374e51579d94a9eb9d3fe77b8171e1a
work_keys_str_mv	AT lukasschwingshackl impactofdifferenttrainingmodalitiesonanthropometricandmetaboliccharacteristicsinoverweightobesesubjectsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT sofiadias impactofdifferenttrainingmodalitiesonanthropometricandmetaboliccharacteristicsinoverweightobesesubjectsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT barbarastrasser impactofdifferenttrainingmodalitiesonanthropometricandmetaboliccharacteristicsinoverweightobesesubjectsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT georghoffmann impactofdifferenttrainingmodalitiesonanthropometricandmetaboliccharacteristicsinoverweightobesesubjectsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
_version_	1718421432174641152

Impact of different training modalities on anthropometric and metabolic characteristics in overweight/obese subjects: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Ejemplares similares