Development of Theory of Economic Diplomacy in Russia in 2000-2018: Scientometric and Institutional Analysis

The development of theoretical research in the field of economic diplomacy, state support of national business in its entry into foreign markets in Russia at the latest stage is considered. The relevance of the topic is determined by the fact that, despite the significant general scientific reserve...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: R. O. Raynkhardt
Formato: article
Lenguaje:RU
Publicado: Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/237b46a443e64ba1b78b9bbda55e1238
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:237b46a443e64ba1b78b9bbda55e1238
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:237b46a443e64ba1b78b9bbda55e12382021-12-02T07:58:06ZDevelopment of Theory of Economic Diplomacy in Russia in 2000-2018: Scientometric and Institutional Analysis2225-756X2227-129510.24224/2227-1295-2019-2-283-295https://doaj.org/article/237b46a443e64ba1b78b9bbda55e12382019-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/1090https://doaj.org/toc/2225-756Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2227-1295The development of theoretical research in the field of economic diplomacy, state support of national business in its entry into foreign markets in Russia at the latest stage is considered. The relevance of the topic is determined by the fact that, despite the significant general scientific reserve in this area, it still shows a tendency to disparate development by both research centres and individual scientists specializing in it. The latter often have a rather poor understanding of the progress and results of specialized research conducted by their colleagues. At the same time, it is the scientific community that is seen as one of the backbone elements of the national economic and diplomatic complex, whose activities are designed to smooth out the contradictions between state bodies, on the one hand, and representatives of the business community, on the other hand. Thus, the consolidation of relevant research centres, competition between them, as well as the overall development of this practice-oriented theoretical direction by its nature are the key to improving the efficiency of Russian foreign policy. On this basis, through the scientometric analysis of methods and tools adapted to the goals and objectives of the project, an institutional map of the scientific community involved in economic diplomacy was drawn up. According to the results of this analysis, a number of trends were identified: the preservation of the positions of institutes and scientific schools traditionally specializing in this area (MGIMO, Diplomatic Academy), the gradual emergence of new participants in this subgroup of the scientific community, the virtual absence of works in this direction in a number of organizations that have objective prerequisites for this, a strong personification of research (the predominance of the scientist’s personality factor over institutional factors), the isolation of the scientific and expert community on itself with weak communication between its individual members at all levels. The revealed phenomena testify to the structural difficulties of institutional development of the scientific community as an agent of economic diplomacy in Russia at the latest stage. An adequate response to the relevant challenges requires further research into each of the described elements of the scientific infrastructure, which can contribute to the development of an overall strategy by decision makers in the field of scientific and economic policy.R. O. RaynkhardtTsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektovarticleeconomic diplomacyscientific policyscientific communityscientific diplomacyscientometricsSlavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languagesPG1-9665RUНаучный диалог, Vol 0, Iss 2, Pp 283-295 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language RU
topic economic diplomacy
scientific policy
scientific community
scientific diplomacy
scientometrics
Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages
PG1-9665
spellingShingle economic diplomacy
scientific policy
scientific community
scientific diplomacy
scientometrics
Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages
PG1-9665
R. O. Raynkhardt
Development of Theory of Economic Diplomacy in Russia in 2000-2018: Scientometric and Institutional Analysis
description The development of theoretical research in the field of economic diplomacy, state support of national business in its entry into foreign markets in Russia at the latest stage is considered. The relevance of the topic is determined by the fact that, despite the significant general scientific reserve in this area, it still shows a tendency to disparate development by both research centres and individual scientists specializing in it. The latter often have a rather poor understanding of the progress and results of specialized research conducted by their colleagues. At the same time, it is the scientific community that is seen as one of the backbone elements of the national economic and diplomatic complex, whose activities are designed to smooth out the contradictions between state bodies, on the one hand, and representatives of the business community, on the other hand. Thus, the consolidation of relevant research centres, competition between them, as well as the overall development of this practice-oriented theoretical direction by its nature are the key to improving the efficiency of Russian foreign policy. On this basis, through the scientometric analysis of methods and tools adapted to the goals and objectives of the project, an institutional map of the scientific community involved in economic diplomacy was drawn up. According to the results of this analysis, a number of trends were identified: the preservation of the positions of institutes and scientific schools traditionally specializing in this area (MGIMO, Diplomatic Academy), the gradual emergence of new participants in this subgroup of the scientific community, the virtual absence of works in this direction in a number of organizations that have objective prerequisites for this, a strong personification of research (the predominance of the scientist’s personality factor over institutional factors), the isolation of the scientific and expert community on itself with weak communication between its individual members at all levels. The revealed phenomena testify to the structural difficulties of institutional development of the scientific community as an agent of economic diplomacy in Russia at the latest stage. An adequate response to the relevant challenges requires further research into each of the described elements of the scientific infrastructure, which can contribute to the development of an overall strategy by decision makers in the field of scientific and economic policy.
format article
author R. O. Raynkhardt
author_facet R. O. Raynkhardt
author_sort R. O. Raynkhardt
title Development of Theory of Economic Diplomacy in Russia in 2000-2018: Scientometric and Institutional Analysis
title_short Development of Theory of Economic Diplomacy in Russia in 2000-2018: Scientometric and Institutional Analysis
title_full Development of Theory of Economic Diplomacy in Russia in 2000-2018: Scientometric and Institutional Analysis
title_fullStr Development of Theory of Economic Diplomacy in Russia in 2000-2018: Scientometric and Institutional Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Development of Theory of Economic Diplomacy in Russia in 2000-2018: Scientometric and Institutional Analysis
title_sort development of theory of economic diplomacy in russia in 2000-2018: scientometric and institutional analysis
publisher Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/237b46a443e64ba1b78b9bbda55e1238
work_keys_str_mv AT roraynkhardt developmentoftheoryofeconomicdiplomacyinrussiain20002018scientometricandinstitutionalanalysis
_version_ 1718398901799616512