Desenvolvimento, Meio Ambiente, Território: Qual Sustentabilidade?

This article is concerned to the links between development and environment, but here it considers the centrality of the territory by the interaction between production activities and nature. A first presumption is that development is a complex process which takes place in a social and natural spa...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ivo M. Theis
Formato: article
Lenguaje:PT
Publicado: Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/238d4d511cf2499ba9e99f851fb076b8
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:238d4d511cf2499ba9e99f851fb076b8
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:238d4d511cf2499ba9e99f851fb076b82021-11-11T15:16:04ZDesenvolvimento, Meio Ambiente, Território: Qual Sustentabilidade?1678-48552237-6453https://doaj.org/article/238d4d511cf2499ba9e99f851fb076b82006-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=75240802https://doaj.org/toc/1678-4855https://doaj.org/toc/2237-6453This article is concerned to the links between development and environment, but here it considers the centrality of the territory by the interaction between production activities and nature. A first presumption is that development is a complex process which takes place in a social and natural space and in a certain historical time. A second presumption is that the causes of the ecological crisis, which can be found in the logic which governs the process of capital accumulation, are filtered by the discourse of sustainability. Finally, the last presumption is that a territorial development, based on social inclusion and environmental prudence of certain localities/regions, may depend not so much from specific policies of insertion in the global economy: it probably depends more from the manner by which they interact with other regional structures of the respective national socioeconomic formation as also of the global economy. By analyzing so an subject one is submitted to much risks. The most serious is certainly that there is impossible to examine the links between development and the environment at the necessary profundity without entering diverse disciplines of knowledge. So, while development is a concept referred to the political economy, that of environment is referred to the political ecology, and that of territory is referred to the geography. It is necessary to advertise, first, that the point of departure is not the environment, but development; second, that the point of view is that of political economy; and third, that (perhaps of surprise for economists as also for biologists and geographers) it is assumed that production, in every space and every time, is responsible for the alleged ecological crisis.Ivo M. TheisUniversidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do SularticledevelopmentenvironmentglobalizationsustainabilityterritoryEconomic growth, development, planningHD72-88PTDesenvolvimento em Questão, Vol 4, Iss 8, Pp 11-34 (2006)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language PT
topic development
environment
globalization
sustainability
territory
Economic growth, development, planning
HD72-88
spellingShingle development
environment
globalization
sustainability
territory
Economic growth, development, planning
HD72-88
Ivo M. Theis
Desenvolvimento, Meio Ambiente, Território: Qual Sustentabilidade?
description This article is concerned to the links between development and environment, but here it considers the centrality of the territory by the interaction between production activities and nature. A first presumption is that development is a complex process which takes place in a social and natural space and in a certain historical time. A second presumption is that the causes of the ecological crisis, which can be found in the logic which governs the process of capital accumulation, are filtered by the discourse of sustainability. Finally, the last presumption is that a territorial development, based on social inclusion and environmental prudence of certain localities/regions, may depend not so much from specific policies of insertion in the global economy: it probably depends more from the manner by which they interact with other regional structures of the respective national socioeconomic formation as also of the global economy. By analyzing so an subject one is submitted to much risks. The most serious is certainly that there is impossible to examine the links between development and the environment at the necessary profundity without entering diverse disciplines of knowledge. So, while development is a concept referred to the political economy, that of environment is referred to the political ecology, and that of territory is referred to the geography. It is necessary to advertise, first, that the point of departure is not the environment, but development; second, that the point of view is that of political economy; and third, that (perhaps of surprise for economists as also for biologists and geographers) it is assumed that production, in every space and every time, is responsible for the alleged ecological crisis.
format article
author Ivo M. Theis
author_facet Ivo M. Theis
author_sort Ivo M. Theis
title Desenvolvimento, Meio Ambiente, Território: Qual Sustentabilidade?
title_short Desenvolvimento, Meio Ambiente, Território: Qual Sustentabilidade?
title_full Desenvolvimento, Meio Ambiente, Território: Qual Sustentabilidade?
title_fullStr Desenvolvimento, Meio Ambiente, Território: Qual Sustentabilidade?
title_full_unstemmed Desenvolvimento, Meio Ambiente, Território: Qual Sustentabilidade?
title_sort desenvolvimento, meio ambiente, território: qual sustentabilidade?
publisher Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul
publishDate 2006
url https://doaj.org/article/238d4d511cf2499ba9e99f851fb076b8
work_keys_str_mv AT ivomtheis desenvolvimentomeioambienteterritorioqualsustentabilidade
_version_ 1718435867624734720