Advanced Modeling of Enclosed Airspaces to Determine Thermal Resistance for Building Applications

Enclosed airspaces to reduce heat flow have been recognized for well over 100 years. Airspaces with one or more reflective surfaces define reflective insulation (RI) assemblies, a product type used in walls, roofs, windows with multiple panes, curtain walls and skylights. The thermal resistance (R v...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamed H. Saber, David W. Yarbrough
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
T
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/239c12ed476d4f43a22e2624523ea120
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:239c12ed476d4f43a22e2624523ea120
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:239c12ed476d4f43a22e2624523ea1202021-11-25T17:28:38ZAdvanced Modeling of Enclosed Airspaces to Determine Thermal Resistance for Building Applications10.3390/en142277721996-1073https://doaj.org/article/239c12ed476d4f43a22e2624523ea1202021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/22/7772https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1073Enclosed airspaces to reduce heat flow have been recognized for well over 100 years. Airspaces with one or more reflective surfaces define reflective insulation (RI) assemblies, a product type used in walls, roofs, windows with multiple panes, curtain walls and skylights. The thermal resistance (R value) of airspaces depends on the emittance of all surfaces, airspace dimensions and orientation, heat flow direction and surfaces temperatures. The modeling of RI now includes CFD coupled with radiation to quantify the total heat transfer. This study compares a validated model for airspace R values with existing methods such as ISO 6946 and hot-box results that provide the R values in the ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals. The existing methods do not include an airspace aspect ratio. This study showed that the aspect ratio can impact the R value by a factor of two. The impact of aspect ratio was calculated for double airspaces variation such as that for single airspaces. The present calculations are two-dimensional and also consider all the bounding airspace surfaces, while previous methods are one-dimensional and do not include surface temperature variations or detailed radiative transport.Hamed H. SaberDavid W. YarbroughMDPI AGarticlereflective insulationsaspect ratioenclosed airspacelow-emittance materialsradiation and convection heat transferR valueTechnologyTENEnergies, Vol 14, Iss 7772, p 7772 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic reflective insulations
aspect ratio
enclosed airspace
low-emittance materials
radiation and convection heat transfer
R value
Technology
T
spellingShingle reflective insulations
aspect ratio
enclosed airspace
low-emittance materials
radiation and convection heat transfer
R value
Technology
T
Hamed H. Saber
David W. Yarbrough
Advanced Modeling of Enclosed Airspaces to Determine Thermal Resistance for Building Applications
description Enclosed airspaces to reduce heat flow have been recognized for well over 100 years. Airspaces with one or more reflective surfaces define reflective insulation (RI) assemblies, a product type used in walls, roofs, windows with multiple panes, curtain walls and skylights. The thermal resistance (R value) of airspaces depends on the emittance of all surfaces, airspace dimensions and orientation, heat flow direction and surfaces temperatures. The modeling of RI now includes CFD coupled with radiation to quantify the total heat transfer. This study compares a validated model for airspace R values with existing methods such as ISO 6946 and hot-box results that provide the R values in the ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals. The existing methods do not include an airspace aspect ratio. This study showed that the aspect ratio can impact the R value by a factor of two. The impact of aspect ratio was calculated for double airspaces variation such as that for single airspaces. The present calculations are two-dimensional and also consider all the bounding airspace surfaces, while previous methods are one-dimensional and do not include surface temperature variations or detailed radiative transport.
format article
author Hamed H. Saber
David W. Yarbrough
author_facet Hamed H. Saber
David W. Yarbrough
author_sort Hamed H. Saber
title Advanced Modeling of Enclosed Airspaces to Determine Thermal Resistance for Building Applications
title_short Advanced Modeling of Enclosed Airspaces to Determine Thermal Resistance for Building Applications
title_full Advanced Modeling of Enclosed Airspaces to Determine Thermal Resistance for Building Applications
title_fullStr Advanced Modeling of Enclosed Airspaces to Determine Thermal Resistance for Building Applications
title_full_unstemmed Advanced Modeling of Enclosed Airspaces to Determine Thermal Resistance for Building Applications
title_sort advanced modeling of enclosed airspaces to determine thermal resistance for building applications
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/239c12ed476d4f43a22e2624523ea120
work_keys_str_mv AT hamedhsaber advancedmodelingofenclosedairspacestodeterminethermalresistanceforbuildingapplications
AT davidwyarbrough advancedmodelingofenclosedairspacestodeterminethermalresistanceforbuildingapplications
_version_ 1718412272737452032