Co-Production within Child and Adolescent Mental Health: A Systematic Review

<b>Background:</b> Mental health services are currently experiencing much systemic and organisational change. Many countries have adopted a recovery approach to service provision through the development of national policies and frameworks. Within an Irish context, co-production has been...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Michael John Norton
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/23a15fe43ffd415a92a7bec06239518a
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:23a15fe43ffd415a92a7bec06239518a
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:23a15fe43ffd415a92a7bec06239518a2021-11-25T17:49:18ZCo-Production within Child and Adolescent Mental Health: A Systematic Review10.3390/ijerph1822118971660-46011661-7827https://doaj.org/article/23a15fe43ffd415a92a7bec06239518a2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/22/11897https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601<b>Background:</b> Mental health services are currently experiencing much systemic and organisational change. Many countries have adopted a recovery approach to service provision through the development of national policies and frameworks. Within an Irish context, co-production has been identified as one of the four pillars required for services to become recovery orientated. However, there is a paucity of literature relating to the concept within child and adolescent mental health services. This paper aims to synthesise the peer-reviewed evidence on co-production within such services. <b>Methods:</b> A PRISMA compliant systematic review was undertaken. This includes how the reviewer retrieved, shortlisted, and selected studies for inclusion in the review. It outlines the inclusion/exclusion criteria and how these were further developed through the PICO framework. Finally, the methods also outline how the reviewer assessed bias and quality, as well as the process of data synthesis. <b>Results:</b> Two studies were included in this review, both focusing on co-production, but in different contexts within child and adolescent mental health. Two themes were identified: ‘<i>road less travelled</i>’ and ‘<i>co-producing equality</i>’. These themes and the associated sub-themes describe how co-production works in these services. <b>Discussion:</b> These results highlight the paucity of quality literature in co-production within child and adolescent mental health. Both studies scored poorly in terms of quality. Resulting from this review, a number of actions relating to the therapeutic environment need to be taken into account for co-production to be further implemented. <b>Other:</b> The reviewer has not received any funding for this paper. A protocol was not created or registered for this review.Michael John NortonMDPI AGarticleco-productionyoung peoplemental healthrecoveryorganisational changeMedicineRENInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol 18, Iss 11897, p 11897 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic co-production
young people
mental health
recovery
organisational change
Medicine
R
spellingShingle co-production
young people
mental health
recovery
organisational change
Medicine
R
Michael John Norton
Co-Production within Child and Adolescent Mental Health: A Systematic Review
description <b>Background:</b> Mental health services are currently experiencing much systemic and organisational change. Many countries have adopted a recovery approach to service provision through the development of national policies and frameworks. Within an Irish context, co-production has been identified as one of the four pillars required for services to become recovery orientated. However, there is a paucity of literature relating to the concept within child and adolescent mental health services. This paper aims to synthesise the peer-reviewed evidence on co-production within such services. <b>Methods:</b> A PRISMA compliant systematic review was undertaken. This includes how the reviewer retrieved, shortlisted, and selected studies for inclusion in the review. It outlines the inclusion/exclusion criteria and how these were further developed through the PICO framework. Finally, the methods also outline how the reviewer assessed bias and quality, as well as the process of data synthesis. <b>Results:</b> Two studies were included in this review, both focusing on co-production, but in different contexts within child and adolescent mental health. Two themes were identified: ‘<i>road less travelled</i>’ and ‘<i>co-producing equality</i>’. These themes and the associated sub-themes describe how co-production works in these services. <b>Discussion:</b> These results highlight the paucity of quality literature in co-production within child and adolescent mental health. Both studies scored poorly in terms of quality. Resulting from this review, a number of actions relating to the therapeutic environment need to be taken into account for co-production to be further implemented. <b>Other:</b> The reviewer has not received any funding for this paper. A protocol was not created or registered for this review.
format article
author Michael John Norton
author_facet Michael John Norton
author_sort Michael John Norton
title Co-Production within Child and Adolescent Mental Health: A Systematic Review
title_short Co-Production within Child and Adolescent Mental Health: A Systematic Review
title_full Co-Production within Child and Adolescent Mental Health: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Co-Production within Child and Adolescent Mental Health: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Co-Production within Child and Adolescent Mental Health: A Systematic Review
title_sort co-production within child and adolescent mental health: a systematic review
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/23a15fe43ffd415a92a7bec06239518a
work_keys_str_mv AT michaeljohnnorton coproductionwithinchildandadolescentmentalhealthasystematicreview
_version_ 1718411972902387712