Astigmatic Results of a Diffractive Trifocal Toric IOL Following Intraoperative Aberrometry Guidance

John F Blaylock,1 Brad Hall2 1Valley Laser Eye Centre, Abbotsford, BC, Canada; 2Sengi, Penniac, NB, CanadaCorrespondence: Brad HallSengi, 473 Route 628, Penniac, NB E3A 8X8, CanadaTel +1 888-255-8680Email bhall@sengiclinical.comPurpose: To determine if intraoperative aberrometry (IA) improves astigm...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blaylock JF, Hall B
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/23b65da4e67c4661a61138891d546907
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:23b65da4e67c4661a61138891d546907
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:23b65da4e67c4661a61138891d5469072021-12-02T16:11:15ZAstigmatic Results of a Diffractive Trifocal Toric IOL Following Intraoperative Aberrometry Guidance1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/23b65da4e67c4661a61138891d5469072020-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/astigmatic-results-of-a-diffractive-trifocal-toric-iol-following-intra-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483John F Blaylock,1 Brad Hall2 1Valley Laser Eye Centre, Abbotsford, BC, Canada; 2Sengi, Penniac, NB, CanadaCorrespondence: Brad HallSengi, 473 Route 628, Penniac, NB E3A 8X8, CanadaTel +1 888-255-8680Email bhall@sengiclinical.comPurpose: To determine if intraoperative aberrometry (IA) improves astigmatic outcomes for trifocal toric IOL (TTI) cases.Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective study examining 137 eyes that underwent cataract extraction and TTI implantation using femtosecond laser, digital registration, and IA. Final cylinder power and axis of placement were determined by IA. Monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), and refractive data were collected at 3 months. Postoperative residual astigmatism (PRA) determined by manifest refraction was compared to back-calculated residual astigmatism (BRA) using the cylinder power calculated preoperatively.Results: Postoperatively, 97.8% of eyes had IA PRA ≤ 0.50D and 80.3% had BRA ≤ 0.50 D, a difference of 17.5%. Mean PRA for IA was 0.07 D ± 0.19 (range 0.00– 1.00 D) compared to BRA 0.31 D ± 0.33 (range 0.00– 1.34 D) (P < 0.001). Cylinder power was changed in 50.4% of cases based upon IA. Postoperative mean UDVA (LogMAR) was 0.04 ± 0.09 (range − 0.12– 0.30 logMAR), and 65% of eyes were ≤ 0.0, 85% ≤ 0.1, and 99% ≤ 0.18.Conclusion: The proportion of eyes with PRA ≤ 0.50 D and mean PRA was significantly lower using IA versus the preoperative planned cylinder power.Keywords: PanOptix, trifocal IOL, toric IOL, cataract surgeryBlaylock JFHall BDove Medical Pressarticlepanoptixtrifocal ioltoric iolcataract surgeryOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol Volume 14, Pp 4373-4378 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic panoptix
trifocal iol
toric iol
cataract surgery
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle panoptix
trifocal iol
toric iol
cataract surgery
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Blaylock JF
Hall B
Astigmatic Results of a Diffractive Trifocal Toric IOL Following Intraoperative Aberrometry Guidance
description John F Blaylock,1 Brad Hall2 1Valley Laser Eye Centre, Abbotsford, BC, Canada; 2Sengi, Penniac, NB, CanadaCorrespondence: Brad HallSengi, 473 Route 628, Penniac, NB E3A 8X8, CanadaTel +1 888-255-8680Email bhall@sengiclinical.comPurpose: To determine if intraoperative aberrometry (IA) improves astigmatic outcomes for trifocal toric IOL (TTI) cases.Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective study examining 137 eyes that underwent cataract extraction and TTI implantation using femtosecond laser, digital registration, and IA. Final cylinder power and axis of placement were determined by IA. Monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), and refractive data were collected at 3 months. Postoperative residual astigmatism (PRA) determined by manifest refraction was compared to back-calculated residual astigmatism (BRA) using the cylinder power calculated preoperatively.Results: Postoperatively, 97.8% of eyes had IA PRA ≤ 0.50D and 80.3% had BRA ≤ 0.50 D, a difference of 17.5%. Mean PRA for IA was 0.07 D ± 0.19 (range 0.00– 1.00 D) compared to BRA 0.31 D ± 0.33 (range 0.00– 1.34 D) (P < 0.001). Cylinder power was changed in 50.4% of cases based upon IA. Postoperative mean UDVA (LogMAR) was 0.04 ± 0.09 (range − 0.12– 0.30 logMAR), and 65% of eyes were ≤ 0.0, 85% ≤ 0.1, and 99% ≤ 0.18.Conclusion: The proportion of eyes with PRA ≤ 0.50 D and mean PRA was significantly lower using IA versus the preoperative planned cylinder power.Keywords: PanOptix, trifocal IOL, toric IOL, cataract surgery
format article
author Blaylock JF
Hall B
author_facet Blaylock JF
Hall B
author_sort Blaylock JF
title Astigmatic Results of a Diffractive Trifocal Toric IOL Following Intraoperative Aberrometry Guidance
title_short Astigmatic Results of a Diffractive Trifocal Toric IOL Following Intraoperative Aberrometry Guidance
title_full Astigmatic Results of a Diffractive Trifocal Toric IOL Following Intraoperative Aberrometry Guidance
title_fullStr Astigmatic Results of a Diffractive Trifocal Toric IOL Following Intraoperative Aberrometry Guidance
title_full_unstemmed Astigmatic Results of a Diffractive Trifocal Toric IOL Following Intraoperative Aberrometry Guidance
title_sort astigmatic results of a diffractive trifocal toric iol following intraoperative aberrometry guidance
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/23b65da4e67c4661a61138891d546907
work_keys_str_mv AT blaylockjf astigmaticresultsofadiffractivetrifocaltoriciolfollowingintraoperativeaberrometryguidance
AT hallb astigmaticresultsofadiffractivetrifocaltoriciolfollowingintraoperativeaberrometryguidance
_version_ 1718384397053329408