Simulated responses of permafrost distribution to climate change on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau

Abstract Climate warming causes changes in permafrost distribution, which affects the surface energy balance, hydrologic cycle and carbon flux in cold regions. In this study, the Surface Frost Number model was applied to examine permafrost distribution on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau (QTP) under the fo...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qing Lu, Dongsheng Zhao, Shaohong Wu
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/23c813809e9b476e9da85439296809fe
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:23c813809e9b476e9da85439296809fe
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:23c813809e9b476e9da85439296809fe2021-12-02T15:06:19ZSimulated responses of permafrost distribution to climate change on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau10.1038/s41598-017-04140-72045-2322https://doaj.org/article/23c813809e9b476e9da85439296809fe2017-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04140-7https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Climate warming causes changes in permafrost distribution, which affects the surface energy balance, hydrologic cycle and carbon flux in cold regions. In this study, the Surface Frost Number model was applied to examine permafrost distribution on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau (QTP) under the four RCPs (RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP6.0, and RCP8.5). The Kappa statistic was used to evaluate model results by comparing simulations of baseline permafrost distribution (1981–2010) with the existing frozen soil maps. The comparison shows that the Surface Frost Number model is suitable for simulating the general characteristics of permafrost distribution on the QTP. Simulated results suggest that areas of permafrost degradation would be the smallest in the near-term (2011‒2040) with the rates of 17.17%, 18.07%, 12.95% and 15.66% under RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP6.0 and RCP8.5, respectively. The rate of permafrost degradation would be faster in the mid-term (2041‒2070), especially under the RCP8.5 scenario (about 41.42%). Areas of permafrost degradation would be the largest in the long-term (2071‒2099) relative to baseline conditions, with a modelled 64.31% decrease in permafrost distribution using the RCP8.5 scenario. Our results would help the decision‒making for engineering construction program on the QTP, and support local units in their efforts to adapt climate change.Qing LuDongsheng ZhaoShaohong WuNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Qing Lu
Dongsheng Zhao
Shaohong Wu
Simulated responses of permafrost distribution to climate change on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau
description Abstract Climate warming causes changes in permafrost distribution, which affects the surface energy balance, hydrologic cycle and carbon flux in cold regions. In this study, the Surface Frost Number model was applied to examine permafrost distribution on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau (QTP) under the four RCPs (RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP6.0, and RCP8.5). The Kappa statistic was used to evaluate model results by comparing simulations of baseline permafrost distribution (1981–2010) with the existing frozen soil maps. The comparison shows that the Surface Frost Number model is suitable for simulating the general characteristics of permafrost distribution on the QTP. Simulated results suggest that areas of permafrost degradation would be the smallest in the near-term (2011‒2040) with the rates of 17.17%, 18.07%, 12.95% and 15.66% under RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP6.0 and RCP8.5, respectively. The rate of permafrost degradation would be faster in the mid-term (2041‒2070), especially under the RCP8.5 scenario (about 41.42%). Areas of permafrost degradation would be the largest in the long-term (2071‒2099) relative to baseline conditions, with a modelled 64.31% decrease in permafrost distribution using the RCP8.5 scenario. Our results would help the decision‒making for engineering construction program on the QTP, and support local units in their efforts to adapt climate change.
format article
author Qing Lu
Dongsheng Zhao
Shaohong Wu
author_facet Qing Lu
Dongsheng Zhao
Shaohong Wu
author_sort Qing Lu
title Simulated responses of permafrost distribution to climate change on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau
title_short Simulated responses of permafrost distribution to climate change on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau
title_full Simulated responses of permafrost distribution to climate change on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau
title_fullStr Simulated responses of permafrost distribution to climate change on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau
title_full_unstemmed Simulated responses of permafrost distribution to climate change on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau
title_sort simulated responses of permafrost distribution to climate change on the qinghai–tibet plateau
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/23c813809e9b476e9da85439296809fe
work_keys_str_mv AT qinglu simulatedresponsesofpermafrostdistributiontoclimatechangeontheqinghaitibetplateau
AT dongshengzhao simulatedresponsesofpermafrostdistributiontoclimatechangeontheqinghaitibetplateau
AT shaohongwu simulatedresponsesofpermafrostdistributiontoclimatechangeontheqinghaitibetplateau
_version_ 1718388500288503808