The ‘Ulama and the Religio-Political Developments in Modern India
This paper is not an exercise in or a contribution to the ongoing debate in the Muslim world about the nature of the relationship between Islamic principles and Western statecraft, or the inseparability of spiritual and profane in a Muslim state. While all these issues are in one way or another rel...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
International Institute of Islamic Thought
1988
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/23d46a5e155e4c6780b00d083b5feb95 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | This paper is not an exercise in or a contribution to the ongoing debate
in the Muslim world about the nature of the relationship between Islamic
principles and Western statecraft, or the inseparability of spiritual and profane
in a Muslim state. While all these issues are in one way or another relevant
to the subject under discussion here, they do not form its core. This paper
has two major objectives. The first is to attempt to analyze how the ’ulama
viewed political developments in the late 19th and early 20th century in India.
The second, equally important but only indirectly touched on in this paper
(and the two are interrelated), is an investigation into whether it was Islamic
religious issues or the presence of the British that engrossed the attention
of the ‘ulama.
This is essential if one is to understand the nature of the ‘ulama’s
participation in the formative phase of religio-political developments in 19th
and 20th century Indian Islam, and in particular, its impact in later years
on the interaction between the ’ulama and the Muslim League. It is in relation
to both these objectives that a great deal of analysis-both from objective
and polemical points of view-regarding the nature and content of the role
of the ‘ulama in politics suffers from a great degree of biases and confusion.
Before discussing the political role of the Indian ‘ulama, it is necessary
to observe that it would be wrong to think of the ‘ulama in terms of an “estate”
within the Muslim community or to assume that the ‘ulama were, as a body,
capable of generating a joint political will. The reason for ‘ulama to take
so long to appear on the political horizon of India was one of principle and
expediency, that stopped the ’ulama from hurling futiiwa of condemnation
at the East India Company when it eventually superseded Mughal power in
India. Until 1790, penal justice in Bengal continued to be dispensed under
the revised Shari’ah forms of Aurengzeb’s time. In the sphere of civil law, ...
|
|---|