Predictive value of D-dimer and analysis of risk factors in pregnant women with suspected pulmonary embolism after cesarean section

Abstract Background Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality, and cesarean section is an established independent risk factor for PE. The diagnostic utility of D-dimer for PE in non-pregnant women has been well-established, but its role in women with suspected...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Limin Zhang, Yunqiu Chen, Wenjuan Liu, Xinzhuo Wang, Shuang Zhang, Wenyan Zhang, Shuai Zhao, Miaomiao Zhang, Su Zhang, Guangyu Jiao
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/23d77ea137a74d4f888b6f40ea09261b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:23d77ea137a74d4f888b6f40ea09261b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:23d77ea137a74d4f888b6f40ea09261b2021-12-05T12:23:27ZPredictive value of D-dimer and analysis of risk factors in pregnant women with suspected pulmonary embolism after cesarean section10.1186/s12890-021-01757-31471-2466https://doaj.org/article/23d77ea137a74d4f888b6f40ea09261b2021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-021-01757-3https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2466Abstract Background Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality, and cesarean section is an established independent risk factor for PE. The diagnostic utility of D-dimer for PE in non-pregnant women has been well-established, but its role in women with suspected PE after cesarean section is unclear. Furthermore, the optimal threshold level in this patient population is unknown. Traditional D-dimer levels have low diagnostic specificity, resulting in many pregnant women being exposed to potentially harmful radiation despite negative diagnostic imaging results. This research aimed to optimize the clinical threshold for D-dimer to improve specificity while ensuring high sensitivity and to identify risk factors for PE after cesarean section. Methods This retrospective study of 289 women who underwent diagnostic imaging (ventilation/perfusion [V/Q] or computed tomographic pulmonary angiography [CTPA]) for suspected acute PE after cesarean delivery from 2010 to 2021 was conducted. Clinical data and laboratory indicators within 24 h postpartum including D-dimer levels were collected for analyses. Results The final analysis included 125 patients, among whom 33 were diagnosed with acute PE (incidence of 11.42%, 95% confidence interval 7.7–15.1). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis suggested that a D-dimer cut-off value of 800 ng/mL had specificity of 25.26% and sensitivity of 100% for detecting PE. The cut-off value was adjusted to 1000 ng/mL with a specificity of 34.74% and a sensitivity of 96.67%. Using a D-dimer cut-off value of 800 ng/mL (instead of the conventional value of 500 ng/mL) increased the number of patients excluded from suspected PE from 9.6 to 18.4% without additional false-negative results. Of note, a history of known thrombophilia was significantly more common in patients with PE than in those without (P < 0.05). No other independent risk factors were noted in our study. Conclusions The D-dimer cut-off value of 800 ng/mL ensures high sensitivity and increases specificity compared to the conventional threshold of 500 ng/mL. Utilizing this higher threshold can reduce the number of unnecessary CT and subsequently unnecessary radiation exposure, in women after cesarean delivery. Prospective studies should also be conducted to verify these results.Limin ZhangYunqiu ChenWenjuan LiuXinzhuo WangShuang ZhangWenyan ZhangShuai ZhaoMiaomiao ZhangSu ZhangGuangyu JiaoBMCarticleAcute pulmonary embolismD-dimerCesarean sectionDiagnosisRisk factorsDiseases of the respiratory systemRC705-779ENBMC Pulmonary Medicine, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Acute pulmonary embolism
D-dimer
Cesarean section
Diagnosis
Risk factors
Diseases of the respiratory system
RC705-779
spellingShingle Acute pulmonary embolism
D-dimer
Cesarean section
Diagnosis
Risk factors
Diseases of the respiratory system
RC705-779
Limin Zhang
Yunqiu Chen
Wenjuan Liu
Xinzhuo Wang
Shuang Zhang
Wenyan Zhang
Shuai Zhao
Miaomiao Zhang
Su Zhang
Guangyu Jiao
Predictive value of D-dimer and analysis of risk factors in pregnant women with suspected pulmonary embolism after cesarean section
description Abstract Background Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality, and cesarean section is an established independent risk factor for PE. The diagnostic utility of D-dimer for PE in non-pregnant women has been well-established, but its role in women with suspected PE after cesarean section is unclear. Furthermore, the optimal threshold level in this patient population is unknown. Traditional D-dimer levels have low diagnostic specificity, resulting in many pregnant women being exposed to potentially harmful radiation despite negative diagnostic imaging results. This research aimed to optimize the clinical threshold for D-dimer to improve specificity while ensuring high sensitivity and to identify risk factors for PE after cesarean section. Methods This retrospective study of 289 women who underwent diagnostic imaging (ventilation/perfusion [V/Q] or computed tomographic pulmonary angiography [CTPA]) for suspected acute PE after cesarean delivery from 2010 to 2021 was conducted. Clinical data and laboratory indicators within 24 h postpartum including D-dimer levels were collected for analyses. Results The final analysis included 125 patients, among whom 33 were diagnosed with acute PE (incidence of 11.42%, 95% confidence interval 7.7–15.1). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis suggested that a D-dimer cut-off value of 800 ng/mL had specificity of 25.26% and sensitivity of 100% for detecting PE. The cut-off value was adjusted to 1000 ng/mL with a specificity of 34.74% and a sensitivity of 96.67%. Using a D-dimer cut-off value of 800 ng/mL (instead of the conventional value of 500 ng/mL) increased the number of patients excluded from suspected PE from 9.6 to 18.4% without additional false-negative results. Of note, a history of known thrombophilia was significantly more common in patients with PE than in those without (P < 0.05). No other independent risk factors were noted in our study. Conclusions The D-dimer cut-off value of 800 ng/mL ensures high sensitivity and increases specificity compared to the conventional threshold of 500 ng/mL. Utilizing this higher threshold can reduce the number of unnecessary CT and subsequently unnecessary radiation exposure, in women after cesarean delivery. Prospective studies should also be conducted to verify these results.
format article
author Limin Zhang
Yunqiu Chen
Wenjuan Liu
Xinzhuo Wang
Shuang Zhang
Wenyan Zhang
Shuai Zhao
Miaomiao Zhang
Su Zhang
Guangyu Jiao
author_facet Limin Zhang
Yunqiu Chen
Wenjuan Liu
Xinzhuo Wang
Shuang Zhang
Wenyan Zhang
Shuai Zhao
Miaomiao Zhang
Su Zhang
Guangyu Jiao
author_sort Limin Zhang
title Predictive value of D-dimer and analysis of risk factors in pregnant women with suspected pulmonary embolism after cesarean section
title_short Predictive value of D-dimer and analysis of risk factors in pregnant women with suspected pulmonary embolism after cesarean section
title_full Predictive value of D-dimer and analysis of risk factors in pregnant women with suspected pulmonary embolism after cesarean section
title_fullStr Predictive value of D-dimer and analysis of risk factors in pregnant women with suspected pulmonary embolism after cesarean section
title_full_unstemmed Predictive value of D-dimer and analysis of risk factors in pregnant women with suspected pulmonary embolism after cesarean section
title_sort predictive value of d-dimer and analysis of risk factors in pregnant women with suspected pulmonary embolism after cesarean section
publisher BMC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/23d77ea137a74d4f888b6f40ea09261b
work_keys_str_mv AT liminzhang predictivevalueofddimerandanalysisofriskfactorsinpregnantwomenwithsuspectedpulmonaryembolismaftercesareansection
AT yunqiuchen predictivevalueofddimerandanalysisofriskfactorsinpregnantwomenwithsuspectedpulmonaryembolismaftercesareansection
AT wenjuanliu predictivevalueofddimerandanalysisofriskfactorsinpregnantwomenwithsuspectedpulmonaryembolismaftercesareansection
AT xinzhuowang predictivevalueofddimerandanalysisofriskfactorsinpregnantwomenwithsuspectedpulmonaryembolismaftercesareansection
AT shuangzhang predictivevalueofddimerandanalysisofriskfactorsinpregnantwomenwithsuspectedpulmonaryembolismaftercesareansection
AT wenyanzhang predictivevalueofddimerandanalysisofriskfactorsinpregnantwomenwithsuspectedpulmonaryembolismaftercesareansection
AT shuaizhao predictivevalueofddimerandanalysisofriskfactorsinpregnantwomenwithsuspectedpulmonaryembolismaftercesareansection
AT miaomiaozhang predictivevalueofddimerandanalysisofriskfactorsinpregnantwomenwithsuspectedpulmonaryembolismaftercesareansection
AT suzhang predictivevalueofddimerandanalysisofriskfactorsinpregnantwomenwithsuspectedpulmonaryembolismaftercesareansection
AT guangyujiao predictivevalueofddimerandanalysisofriskfactorsinpregnantwomenwithsuspectedpulmonaryembolismaftercesareansection
_version_ 1718371946941382656