Visceral artery aneurysms: an institutional review

Methods: It is a retrospective review of prospectively kept data of patients treated for visceral artery aneurysms in Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital and Manmohan Cardiothoracic Vascular and Transplant Center from 1997 to 2009. Results: Fifteen patients were diagnosed with 16 visceral arter...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rajan Sapkota, B Ghimire, PJ Lakhey, R K Ghimire, U K Shrestha
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Society of Surgeons of Nepal 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/23e7aeba571f413c9ede0ff77e4047c0
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:23e7aeba571f413c9ede0ff77e4047c0
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:23e7aeba571f413c9ede0ff77e4047c02021-12-05T19:16:22ZVisceral artery aneurysms: an institutional review10.3126/jssn.v17i2.171401815-39842392-4772https://doaj.org/article/23e7aeba571f413c9ede0ff77e4047c02017-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.nepjol.info/index.php/JSSN/article/view/17140https://doaj.org/toc/1815-3984https://doaj.org/toc/2392-4772 Methods: It is a retrospective review of prospectively kept data of patients treated for visceral artery aneurysms in Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital and Manmohan Cardiothoracic Vascular and Transplant Center from 1997 to 2009. Results: Fifteen patients were diagnosed with 16 visceral artery aneurysms. These consisted of 7 splenic (in 6 patients), 4 hepatic, 2 superior mesenteric, 1 gastroduodenal, and 1 renal artery aneurysms. There were 14 symptomatic patients including 4 who presented with rupture. Commonest presenting symptom was pain abdomen (14/15), followed by gastrointestinal bleed (6/15) and mass abdomen (5/15). The diagnosis was made with the help of CECT of abdomen in 13 patients, which was confirmed by conventional angiography in three patients. In two patients with obscure GI bleeding, diagnosis was clinched by conventional angiogram. Eight patients were treated only surgically, with three mortality. Transcatheter embolization alone was used in 5 patients. Two patients were treated with combination of surgical and endovascular therapy. One patient with superior mesenteric artery aneurysm in whom nothing could be done during laparotomy died six months later. Average follow up duration was one year. Conclusion: Splenic artery remains the most commonly afflicted vessel among the visceral artery aneurysms. The VAAs can be treated surgically or with endovascular means with fair success, although the best mode of treatment needs to be individualized. Journal of Society of Surgeons of Nepal Vol. 17, No. 2, 2014, Page: 3-6 Rajan SapkotaB GhimirePJ LakheyR K GhimireU K ShresthaSociety of Surgeons of NepalarticleSplenic artery aneurysmTranscatheter embolizationVisceral artery aneurysmsSurgeryRD1-811ENJournal of Society of Surgeons of Nepal, Vol 17, Iss 2 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Splenic artery aneurysm
Transcatheter embolization
Visceral artery aneurysms
Surgery
RD1-811
spellingShingle Splenic artery aneurysm
Transcatheter embolization
Visceral artery aneurysms
Surgery
RD1-811
Rajan Sapkota
B Ghimire
PJ Lakhey
R K Ghimire
U K Shrestha
Visceral artery aneurysms: an institutional review
description Methods: It is a retrospective review of prospectively kept data of patients treated for visceral artery aneurysms in Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital and Manmohan Cardiothoracic Vascular and Transplant Center from 1997 to 2009. Results: Fifteen patients were diagnosed with 16 visceral artery aneurysms. These consisted of 7 splenic (in 6 patients), 4 hepatic, 2 superior mesenteric, 1 gastroduodenal, and 1 renal artery aneurysms. There were 14 symptomatic patients including 4 who presented with rupture. Commonest presenting symptom was pain abdomen (14/15), followed by gastrointestinal bleed (6/15) and mass abdomen (5/15). The diagnosis was made with the help of CECT of abdomen in 13 patients, which was confirmed by conventional angiography in three patients. In two patients with obscure GI bleeding, diagnosis was clinched by conventional angiogram. Eight patients were treated only surgically, with three mortality. Transcatheter embolization alone was used in 5 patients. Two patients were treated with combination of surgical and endovascular therapy. One patient with superior mesenteric artery aneurysm in whom nothing could be done during laparotomy died six months later. Average follow up duration was one year. Conclusion: Splenic artery remains the most commonly afflicted vessel among the visceral artery aneurysms. The VAAs can be treated surgically or with endovascular means with fair success, although the best mode of treatment needs to be individualized. Journal of Society of Surgeons of Nepal Vol. 17, No. 2, 2014, Page: 3-6
format article
author Rajan Sapkota
B Ghimire
PJ Lakhey
R K Ghimire
U K Shrestha
author_facet Rajan Sapkota
B Ghimire
PJ Lakhey
R K Ghimire
U K Shrestha
author_sort Rajan Sapkota
title Visceral artery aneurysms: an institutional review
title_short Visceral artery aneurysms: an institutional review
title_full Visceral artery aneurysms: an institutional review
title_fullStr Visceral artery aneurysms: an institutional review
title_full_unstemmed Visceral artery aneurysms: an institutional review
title_sort visceral artery aneurysms: an institutional review
publisher Society of Surgeons of Nepal
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/23e7aeba571f413c9ede0ff77e4047c0
work_keys_str_mv AT rajansapkota visceralarteryaneurysmsaninstitutionalreview
AT bghimire visceralarteryaneurysmsaninstitutionalreview
AT pjlakhey visceralarteryaneurysmsaninstitutionalreview
AT rkghimire visceralarteryaneurysmsaninstitutionalreview
AT ukshrestha visceralarteryaneurysmsaninstitutionalreview
_version_ 1718371051438604288