Systematic review of instruments for assessing culinary skills in adults: What is the quality of their psychometric properties?

<h4>Background</h4>Culinary skills are important objects of study in the field of Public Health. Studies that propose to develop instruments for assessing such construct show lack of methodological uniformity to report validity and reliability of their instruments.<h4>Objective<...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Aline Rissatto Teixeira, Daniela Bicalho, Betzabeth Slater, Tacio de Mendonça Lima
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/242f4022d9424684857134422977eff5
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:242f4022d9424684857134422977eff5
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:242f4022d9424684857134422977eff52021-12-02T20:15:08ZSystematic review of instruments for assessing culinary skills in adults: What is the quality of their psychometric properties?1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0235182https://doaj.org/article/242f4022d9424684857134422977eff52021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235182https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>Culinary skills are important objects of study in the field of Public Health. Studies that propose to develop instruments for assessing such construct show lack of methodological uniformity to report validity and reliability of their instruments.<h4>Objective</h4>To identify studies that have developed instruments to measure culinary skills in adult population, and critically assess their psychometric properties.<h4>Design</h4>We conducted a systematic review according to the PRISMA statement. We searched literature PubMed/Medline, Scopus, LILACS, and Web of Science databases until January 2021, and consulted Google Scholar for relevant grey literature. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, conducted data extraction, and assessed the psychometric quality of the instruments. A third reviewer resolved any doubts or disagreements in all steps of the systematic review.<h4>Results</h4>The search identified 1148 potentially relevant studies, out of which 9 met the inclusion criteria. In addition, we included 3 studies by searching the related articles and the reference lists of these studies, totaling 12 included studies in this review. Ten studies reported the development of tools measuring culinary skills in adults and 2 studies performed cross-cultural adaptations of original instruments. We considered adequate quality of internal consistency reliability in four studies. One study received adequate rating for test-retest reliability. No studies presented adequate rating for content validity and four studies showed satisfactory results for at least one type of construct validity. One study reported criterion validity and the quality of this psychometric property was inadequate.<h4>Conclusions</h4>We identified many studies that surveyed culinary skills. Although the isolated measures appraised in this review show good promise in terms of quality of psychometric properties, no studies presented adequate measures for each aspect of reliability and validity. A more consistent and consensual definition of culinary skills is recommended. The flaws observed in these studies show that there is a need for ongoing research in the area of the psychometric properties of instruments assessing culinary skills.Aline Rissatto TeixeiraDaniela BicalhoBetzabeth SlaterTacio de Mendonça LimaPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 8, p e0235182 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Aline Rissatto Teixeira Daniela Bicalho Betzabeth Slater Tacio de Mendonça Lima Systematic review of instruments for assessing culinary skills in adults: What is the quality of their psychometric properties?
description	<h4>Background</h4>Culinary skills are important objects of study in the field of Public Health. Studies that propose to develop instruments for assessing such construct show lack of methodological uniformity to report validity and reliability of their instruments.<h4>Objective</h4>To identify studies that have developed instruments to measure culinary skills in adult population, and critically assess their psychometric properties.<h4>Design</h4>We conducted a systematic review according to the PRISMA statement. We searched literature PubMed/Medline, Scopus, LILACS, and Web of Science databases until January 2021, and consulted Google Scholar for relevant grey literature. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, conducted data extraction, and assessed the psychometric quality of the instruments. A third reviewer resolved any doubts or disagreements in all steps of the systematic review.<h4>Results</h4>The search identified 1148 potentially relevant studies, out of which 9 met the inclusion criteria. In addition, we included 3 studies by searching the related articles and the reference lists of these studies, totaling 12 included studies in this review. Ten studies reported the development of tools measuring culinary skills in adults and 2 studies performed cross-cultural adaptations of original instruments. We considered adequate quality of internal consistency reliability in four studies. One study received adequate rating for test-retest reliability. No studies presented adequate rating for content validity and four studies showed satisfactory results for at least one type of construct validity. One study reported criterion validity and the quality of this psychometric property was inadequate.<h4>Conclusions</h4>We identified many studies that surveyed culinary skills. Although the isolated measures appraised in this review show good promise in terms of quality of psychometric properties, no studies presented adequate measures for each aspect of reliability and validity. A more consistent and consensual definition of culinary skills is recommended. The flaws observed in these studies show that there is a need for ongoing research in the area of the psychometric properties of instruments assessing culinary skills.
format	article
author	Aline Rissatto Teixeira Daniela Bicalho Betzabeth Slater Tacio de Mendonça Lima
author_facet	Aline Rissatto Teixeira Daniela Bicalho Betzabeth Slater Tacio de Mendonça Lima
author_sort	Aline Rissatto Teixeira
title	Systematic review of instruments for assessing culinary skills in adults: What is the quality of their psychometric properties?
title_short	Systematic review of instruments for assessing culinary skills in adults: What is the quality of their psychometric properties?
title_full	Systematic review of instruments for assessing culinary skills in adults: What is the quality of their psychometric properties?
title_fullStr	Systematic review of instruments for assessing culinary skills in adults: What is the quality of their psychometric properties?
title_full_unstemmed	Systematic review of instruments for assessing culinary skills in adults: What is the quality of their psychometric properties?
title_sort	systematic review of instruments for assessing culinary skills in adults: what is the quality of their psychometric properties?
publisher	Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/242f4022d9424684857134422977eff5
work_keys_str_mv	AT alinerissattoteixeira systematicreviewofinstrumentsforassessingculinaryskillsinadultswhatisthequalityoftheirpsychometricproperties AT danielabicalho systematicreviewofinstrumentsforassessingculinaryskillsinadultswhatisthequalityoftheirpsychometricproperties AT betzabethslater systematicreviewofinstrumentsforassessingculinaryskillsinadultswhatisthequalityoftheirpsychometricproperties AT taciodemendoncalima systematicreviewofinstrumentsforassessingculinaryskillsinadultswhatisthequalityoftheirpsychometricproperties
_version_	1718374571174789120

Systematic review of instruments for assessing culinary skills in adults: What is the quality of their psychometric properties?

Ejemplares similares