Minimal invasive puncture and drainage versus endoscopic surgery for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in basal ganglia

Zhihong Li,1,* Yuqian Li,1,* Feifei Xu,2,* Xi Zhang,3 Qiang Tian,4 Lihong Li1 1Department of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, 2Department of Foreign Languages, 3Department of Biomedical Engineering, 4Department of Radiology, Tangdu Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, Sh...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li Z, Li Y, Xu F, Zhang X, Tian Q, Li L
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/245e528d261f44a5a1fd69af908083e5
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:245e528d261f44a5a1fd69af908083e5
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:245e528d261f44a5a1fd69af908083e52021-12-02T01:11:36ZMinimal invasive puncture and drainage versus endoscopic surgery for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in basal ganglia1178-2021https://doaj.org/article/245e528d261f44a5a1fd69af908083e52017-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/minimal-invasive-puncture-and-drainage-versus-endoscopic-surgery-for-s-peer-reviewed-article-NDThttps://doaj.org/toc/1178-2021Zhihong Li,1,* Yuqian Li,1,* Feifei Xu,2,* Xi Zhang,3 Qiang Tian,4 Lihong Li1 1Department of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, 2Department of Foreign Languages, 3Department of Biomedical Engineering, 4Department of Radiology, Tangdu Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, People’s Republic of China *These authors contributed equally to this work Abstract: Two prevalent therapies for the treatment of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in basal ganglia are, minimally invasive puncture and drainage (MIPD), and endoscopic surgery (ES). Because both surgical techniques are of a minimally invasive nature, they have attracted greater attention in recent years. However, evidence comparing the curative effect of MIPD and ES has been uncertain. The indication for MIPD or ES has been uncertain till now. In the present study, 112 patients with spontaneous ICH in basal ganglia who received MIPD or ES were reviewed retrospectively. Baseline parameters prior to the operation, evacuation rate (ER), perihematoma edema, postoperative complications, and rebleeding incidences were collected. Moreover, 1-year postictus, the long-term functional outcomes of patients with regard to hematoma volume (HV) or Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score were judged, respectively, by the case fatality, Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), Barthel Index (BI), and modified Rankin Scale (mRS). The ES group had a higher ER than the MIPD group on postoperative day 1. The MIPD group had fewer adverse outcomes, which included less perihematoma edema, anesthetic time, and blood loss, than the ES group. The functional outcomes represented by GOS, BI, and mRS were better in the MIPD group than in the ES group for patients with HV 30–60 mL or GCS score 9–14. These results indicate that ES is more effective in evacuating hematoma in basal ganglia, while MIPD is less invasive than ES. Patients with HV 30–60 mL or GCS score 9–14 may benefit more from the MIPD procedure than from ES. Keywords: intracerebral hemorrhage, minimal invasive, endoscopy, puncture, basal gangliaLi ZLi YXu FZhang XTian QLi LDove Medical PressarticleIntracerebral hemorrhageMinimal invasiveEndoscopyDrainageBasal gangliaNeurosciences. Biological psychiatry. NeuropsychiatryRC321-571Neurology. Diseases of the nervous systemRC346-429ENNeuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, Vol Volume 13, Pp 213-219 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Intracerebral hemorrhage
Minimal invasive
Endoscopy
Drainage
Basal ganglia
Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
RC346-429
spellingShingle Intracerebral hemorrhage
Minimal invasive
Endoscopy
Drainage
Basal ganglia
Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
RC346-429
Li Z
Li Y
Xu F
Zhang X
Tian Q
Li L
Minimal invasive puncture and drainage versus endoscopic surgery for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in basal ganglia
description Zhihong Li,1,* Yuqian Li,1,* Feifei Xu,2,* Xi Zhang,3 Qiang Tian,4 Lihong Li1 1Department of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, 2Department of Foreign Languages, 3Department of Biomedical Engineering, 4Department of Radiology, Tangdu Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, People’s Republic of China *These authors contributed equally to this work Abstract: Two prevalent therapies for the treatment of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in basal ganglia are, minimally invasive puncture and drainage (MIPD), and endoscopic surgery (ES). Because both surgical techniques are of a minimally invasive nature, they have attracted greater attention in recent years. However, evidence comparing the curative effect of MIPD and ES has been uncertain. The indication for MIPD or ES has been uncertain till now. In the present study, 112 patients with spontaneous ICH in basal ganglia who received MIPD or ES were reviewed retrospectively. Baseline parameters prior to the operation, evacuation rate (ER), perihematoma edema, postoperative complications, and rebleeding incidences were collected. Moreover, 1-year postictus, the long-term functional outcomes of patients with regard to hematoma volume (HV) or Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score were judged, respectively, by the case fatality, Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), Barthel Index (BI), and modified Rankin Scale (mRS). The ES group had a higher ER than the MIPD group on postoperative day 1. The MIPD group had fewer adverse outcomes, which included less perihematoma edema, anesthetic time, and blood loss, than the ES group. The functional outcomes represented by GOS, BI, and mRS were better in the MIPD group than in the ES group for patients with HV 30–60 mL or GCS score 9–14. These results indicate that ES is more effective in evacuating hematoma in basal ganglia, while MIPD is less invasive than ES. Patients with HV 30–60 mL or GCS score 9–14 may benefit more from the MIPD procedure than from ES. Keywords: intracerebral hemorrhage, minimal invasive, endoscopy, puncture, basal ganglia
format article
author Li Z
Li Y
Xu F
Zhang X
Tian Q
Li L
author_facet Li Z
Li Y
Xu F
Zhang X
Tian Q
Li L
author_sort Li Z
title Minimal invasive puncture and drainage versus endoscopic surgery for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in basal ganglia
title_short Minimal invasive puncture and drainage versus endoscopic surgery for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in basal ganglia
title_full Minimal invasive puncture and drainage versus endoscopic surgery for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in basal ganglia
title_fullStr Minimal invasive puncture and drainage versus endoscopic surgery for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in basal ganglia
title_full_unstemmed Minimal invasive puncture and drainage versus endoscopic surgery for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in basal ganglia
title_sort minimal invasive puncture and drainage versus endoscopic surgery for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in basal ganglia
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/245e528d261f44a5a1fd69af908083e5
work_keys_str_mv AT liz minimalinvasivepunctureanddrainageversusendoscopicsurgeryforspontaneousintracerebralhemorrhageinbasalganglia
AT liy minimalinvasivepunctureanddrainageversusendoscopicsurgeryforspontaneousintracerebralhemorrhageinbasalganglia
AT xuf minimalinvasivepunctureanddrainageversusendoscopicsurgeryforspontaneousintracerebralhemorrhageinbasalganglia
AT zhangx minimalinvasivepunctureanddrainageversusendoscopicsurgeryforspontaneousintracerebralhemorrhageinbasalganglia
AT tianq minimalinvasivepunctureanddrainageversusendoscopicsurgeryforspontaneousintracerebralhemorrhageinbasalganglia
AT lil minimalinvasivepunctureanddrainageversusendoscopicsurgeryforspontaneousintracerebralhemorrhageinbasalganglia
_version_ 1718403243245043712