A randomized controlled trial comparing functional outcomes for navigated kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty versus navigated mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty: the MaKKRO trial

Aims: Nearly 99,000 total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) are performed in UK annually. Despite plenty of research, the satisfaction rate of this surgery is around 80%. One of the important intraoperative factors affecting the outcome is alignment. The relationship between joint obliquity and functional...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vilas Narayan Sadekar, Sandeep Datir, Victoria Allgar, Hemant Sharma
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/24bfa827e66449d492930ce87fe42b0e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:24bfa827e66449d492930ce87fe42b0e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:24bfa827e66449d492930ce87fe42b0e2021-12-01T18:44:47ZA randomized controlled trial comparing functional outcomes for navigated kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty versus navigated mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty: the MaKKRO trial2633-146210.1302/2633-1462.211.BJO-2021-0094.R1https://doaj.org/article/24bfa827e66449d492930ce87fe42b0e2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.211.BJO-2021-0094.R1https://doaj.org/toc/2633-1462Aims: Nearly 99,000 total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) are performed in UK annually. Despite plenty of research, the satisfaction rate of this surgery is around 80%. One of the important intraoperative factors affecting the outcome is alignment. The relationship between joint obliquity and functional outcomes is not well understood. Therefore, a study is required to investigate and compare the effects of two types of alignment (mechanical and kinematic) on functional outcomes and range of motion. Methods: The aim of the study is to compare navigated kinematically aligned TKAs (KA TKAs) with navigated mechanically aligned TKA (MA TKA) in terms of function and ROM. We aim to recruit a total of 96 patients in the trial. The patients will be recruited from clinics of various consultants working in the trust after screening them for eligibility criteria and obtaining their informed consent to participate in this study. Randomization will be done prior to surgery by a software. The primary outcome measure will be the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score The secondary outcome measures include Oxford Knee Score, ROM, EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire, EuroQol visual analogue scale, 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12), and Forgotten Joint Score. The scores will be calculated preoperatively and then at six weeks, six months, and one year after surgery. The scores will undergo a statistical analysis. Discussion: There is no clear evidence on the best alignment for a knee arthroplasty. This randomized controlled trial will test the null hypothesis that navigated KA TKAs do not perform better than navigated MA TKAs. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(11):945–950.Vilas Narayan SadekarSandeep DatirVictoria AllgarHemant SharmaThe British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgeryarticlearthroplastymechanicalkinematicalignmentprotocolnavigationjoint linerandomized controlled trialfunctional outcomestotal knee arthroplasties (tkas)knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome scoreknee arthroplastiesvisual analogue scaleoxford knee scoreforgotten joint scoresf-12short form health surveyOrthopedic surgeryRD701-811ENBone & Joint Open, Vol 2, Iss 11, Pp 945-950 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic arthroplasty
mechanical
kinematic
alignment
protocol
navigation
joint line
randomized controlled trial
functional outcomes
total knee arthroplasties (tkas)
knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score
knee arthroplasties
visual analogue scale
oxford knee score
forgotten joint score
sf-12
short form health survey
Orthopedic surgery
RD701-811
spellingShingle arthroplasty
mechanical
kinematic
alignment
protocol
navigation
joint line
randomized controlled trial
functional outcomes
total knee arthroplasties (tkas)
knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score
knee arthroplasties
visual analogue scale
oxford knee score
forgotten joint score
sf-12
short form health survey
Orthopedic surgery
RD701-811
Vilas Narayan Sadekar
Sandeep Datir
Victoria Allgar
Hemant Sharma
A randomized controlled trial comparing functional outcomes for navigated kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty versus navigated mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty: the MaKKRO trial
description Aims: Nearly 99,000 total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) are performed in UK annually. Despite plenty of research, the satisfaction rate of this surgery is around 80%. One of the important intraoperative factors affecting the outcome is alignment. The relationship between joint obliquity and functional outcomes is not well understood. Therefore, a study is required to investigate and compare the effects of two types of alignment (mechanical and kinematic) on functional outcomes and range of motion. Methods: The aim of the study is to compare navigated kinematically aligned TKAs (KA TKAs) with navigated mechanically aligned TKA (MA TKA) in terms of function and ROM. We aim to recruit a total of 96 patients in the trial. The patients will be recruited from clinics of various consultants working in the trust after screening them for eligibility criteria and obtaining their informed consent to participate in this study. Randomization will be done prior to surgery by a software. The primary outcome measure will be the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score The secondary outcome measures include Oxford Knee Score, ROM, EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire, EuroQol visual analogue scale, 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12), and Forgotten Joint Score. The scores will be calculated preoperatively and then at six weeks, six months, and one year after surgery. The scores will undergo a statistical analysis. Discussion: There is no clear evidence on the best alignment for a knee arthroplasty. This randomized controlled trial will test the null hypothesis that navigated KA TKAs do not perform better than navigated MA TKAs. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(11):945–950.
format article
author Vilas Narayan Sadekar
Sandeep Datir
Victoria Allgar
Hemant Sharma
author_facet Vilas Narayan Sadekar
Sandeep Datir
Victoria Allgar
Hemant Sharma
author_sort Vilas Narayan Sadekar
title A randomized controlled trial comparing functional outcomes for navigated kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty versus navigated mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty: the MaKKRO trial
title_short A randomized controlled trial comparing functional outcomes for navigated kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty versus navigated mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty: the MaKKRO trial
title_full A randomized controlled trial comparing functional outcomes for navigated kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty versus navigated mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty: the MaKKRO trial
title_fullStr A randomized controlled trial comparing functional outcomes for navigated kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty versus navigated mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty: the MaKKRO trial
title_full_unstemmed A randomized controlled trial comparing functional outcomes for navigated kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty versus navigated mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty: the MaKKRO trial
title_sort randomized controlled trial comparing functional outcomes for navigated kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty versus navigated mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty: the makkro trial
publisher The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/24bfa827e66449d492930ce87fe42b0e
work_keys_str_mv AT vilasnarayansadekar arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfunctionaloutcomesfornavigatedkinematicallyalignedtotalkneearthroplastyversusnavigatedmechanicallyalignedtotalkneearthroplastythemakkrotrial
AT sandeepdatir arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfunctionaloutcomesfornavigatedkinematicallyalignedtotalkneearthroplastyversusnavigatedmechanicallyalignedtotalkneearthroplastythemakkrotrial
AT victoriaallgar arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfunctionaloutcomesfornavigatedkinematicallyalignedtotalkneearthroplastyversusnavigatedmechanicallyalignedtotalkneearthroplastythemakkrotrial
AT hemantsharma arandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfunctionaloutcomesfornavigatedkinematicallyalignedtotalkneearthroplastyversusnavigatedmechanicallyalignedtotalkneearthroplastythemakkrotrial
AT vilasnarayansadekar randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfunctionaloutcomesfornavigatedkinematicallyalignedtotalkneearthroplastyversusnavigatedmechanicallyalignedtotalkneearthroplastythemakkrotrial
AT sandeepdatir randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfunctionaloutcomesfornavigatedkinematicallyalignedtotalkneearthroplastyversusnavigatedmechanicallyalignedtotalkneearthroplastythemakkrotrial
AT victoriaallgar randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfunctionaloutcomesfornavigatedkinematicallyalignedtotalkneearthroplastyversusnavigatedmechanicallyalignedtotalkneearthroplastythemakkrotrial
AT hemantsharma randomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfunctionaloutcomesfornavigatedkinematicallyalignedtotalkneearthroplastyversusnavigatedmechanicallyalignedtotalkneearthroplastythemakkrotrial
_version_ 1718404679792066560