Comparison of Current Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for the Segmentation of Breast Masses in Mammograms

Breast cancer causes approximately 684,996 deaths worldwide, making it the leading cause of female cancer mortality. However, these figures can be reduced with early diagnosis through mammographic imaging, allowing for the timely and effective treatment of this disease. To establish the best tools f...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andres Anaya-Isaza, Leonel Mera-Jimenez, Johan Manuel Cabrera-Chavarro, Lorena Guachi-Guachi, Diego Peluffo-Ordonez, Jorge Ivan Rios-Patino
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: IEEE 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/24da7c29b1dc4ff89aab881bc428dc86
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:24da7c29b1dc4ff89aab881bc428dc86
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:24da7c29b1dc4ff89aab881bc428dc862021-11-20T00:02:15ZComparison of Current Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for the Segmentation of Breast Masses in Mammograms2169-353610.1109/ACCESS.2021.3127862https://doaj.org/article/24da7c29b1dc4ff89aab881bc428dc862021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9614200/https://doaj.org/toc/2169-3536Breast cancer causes approximately 684,996 deaths worldwide, making it the leading cause of female cancer mortality. However, these figures can be reduced with early diagnosis through mammographic imaging, allowing for the timely and effective treatment of this disease. To establish the best tools for contributing to the automatic diagnosis of breast cancer, different deep learning (DL) architectures were compared in terms of breast lesion segmentation, lesion type classification, and degree of suspicion of malignancy tests. The tasks were completed with state-of-the-art architectures and backbones. Initially, during segmentation, the base UNet, Visual Geometry Group 19 (VGG19), InceptionResNetV2, EfficientNet, MobileNetv2, ResNet, ResNeXt, MultiResUNet, linkNet-VGG19, DenseNet, SEResNet and SeResNeXt architectures were compared, where “Res” denotes a residual network. In addition, training was performed with 5 of the most advanced loss functions and validated by the Dice coefficient, sensitivity, and specificity. The proposed models achieved Dice values above 90%, with the EfficientNet architecture achieving 94.75% and 99% accuracy on the two tasks. Subsequently, classification was addressed with the ResNet50V2, VGG19, InceptionResNetV2, DenseNet121, InceptionV3, Xception and EfficientNetB7 networks. The proposed models achieved 96.97% and 97.73% accuracy through the VGG19 and ResNet50V2 networks on the lesion classification and degree of suspicion tasks, respectively. All three tasks were addressed with open-access databases, including the Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM), the Mammographic Image Analysis Society (MIAS) database, and INbreast.Andres Anaya-IsazaLeonel Mera-JimenezJohan Manuel Cabrera-ChavarroLorena Guachi-GuachiDiego Peluffo-OrdonezJorge Ivan Rios-PatinoIEEEarticleArtificial intelligencebiomedical imagingcancerimage segmentationmachine learningmammographyElectrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineeringTK1-9971ENIEEE Access, Vol 9, Pp 152206-152225 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Artificial intelligence
biomedical imaging
cancer
image segmentation
machine learning
mammography
Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering
TK1-9971
spellingShingle Artificial intelligence
biomedical imaging
cancer
image segmentation
machine learning
mammography
Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering
TK1-9971
Andres Anaya-Isaza
Leonel Mera-Jimenez
Johan Manuel Cabrera-Chavarro
Lorena Guachi-Guachi
Diego Peluffo-Ordonez
Jorge Ivan Rios-Patino
Comparison of Current Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for the Segmentation of Breast Masses in Mammograms
description Breast cancer causes approximately 684,996 deaths worldwide, making it the leading cause of female cancer mortality. However, these figures can be reduced with early diagnosis through mammographic imaging, allowing for the timely and effective treatment of this disease. To establish the best tools for contributing to the automatic diagnosis of breast cancer, different deep learning (DL) architectures were compared in terms of breast lesion segmentation, lesion type classification, and degree of suspicion of malignancy tests. The tasks were completed with state-of-the-art architectures and backbones. Initially, during segmentation, the base UNet, Visual Geometry Group 19 (VGG19), InceptionResNetV2, EfficientNet, MobileNetv2, ResNet, ResNeXt, MultiResUNet, linkNet-VGG19, DenseNet, SEResNet and SeResNeXt architectures were compared, where “Res” denotes a residual network. In addition, training was performed with 5 of the most advanced loss functions and validated by the Dice coefficient, sensitivity, and specificity. The proposed models achieved Dice values above 90%, with the EfficientNet architecture achieving 94.75% and 99% accuracy on the two tasks. Subsequently, classification was addressed with the ResNet50V2, VGG19, InceptionResNetV2, DenseNet121, InceptionV3, Xception and EfficientNetB7 networks. The proposed models achieved 96.97% and 97.73% accuracy through the VGG19 and ResNet50V2 networks on the lesion classification and degree of suspicion tasks, respectively. All three tasks were addressed with open-access databases, including the Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM), the Mammographic Image Analysis Society (MIAS) database, and INbreast.
format article
author Andres Anaya-Isaza
Leonel Mera-Jimenez
Johan Manuel Cabrera-Chavarro
Lorena Guachi-Guachi
Diego Peluffo-Ordonez
Jorge Ivan Rios-Patino
author_facet Andres Anaya-Isaza
Leonel Mera-Jimenez
Johan Manuel Cabrera-Chavarro
Lorena Guachi-Guachi
Diego Peluffo-Ordonez
Jorge Ivan Rios-Patino
author_sort Andres Anaya-Isaza
title Comparison of Current Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for the Segmentation of Breast Masses in Mammograms
title_short Comparison of Current Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for the Segmentation of Breast Masses in Mammograms
title_full Comparison of Current Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for the Segmentation of Breast Masses in Mammograms
title_fullStr Comparison of Current Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for the Segmentation of Breast Masses in Mammograms
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Current Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for the Segmentation of Breast Masses in Mammograms
title_sort comparison of current deep convolutional neural networks for the segmentation of breast masses in mammograms
publisher IEEE
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/24da7c29b1dc4ff89aab881bc428dc86
work_keys_str_mv AT andresanayaisaza comparisonofcurrentdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforthesegmentationofbreastmassesinmammograms
AT leonelmerajimenez comparisonofcurrentdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforthesegmentationofbreastmassesinmammograms
AT johanmanuelcabrerachavarro comparisonofcurrentdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforthesegmentationofbreastmassesinmammograms
AT lorenaguachiguachi comparisonofcurrentdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforthesegmentationofbreastmassesinmammograms
AT diegopeluffoordonez comparisonofcurrentdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforthesegmentationofbreastmassesinmammograms
AT jorgeivanriospatino comparisonofcurrentdeepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforthesegmentationofbreastmassesinmammograms
_version_ 1718419823692611584