Bioengineering in the oral cavity: our experience

L Catalfamo,1 E Belli,2 C Nava,1 E Mici,1 A Calvo,1 B D'Alessandro,1 FS De Ponte1 1Unit of Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Messina, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Policlinico G Martino, Messina, Italy; 2Unit of Maxillofacial Surgery, University Rome Sapienza, Azienda Ospedaliera San...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Catalfamo L, Belli E, Nava C, Mici E, Calvo A, D&#39;Alessandro B, De Ponte FS
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:	Medicine (General) R5-920
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/25166486d3ef4f5d826ec66ac6cd26bd
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:25166486d3ef4f5d826ec66ac6cd26bd
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:25166486d3ef4f5d826ec66ac6cd26bd2021-12-02T07:22:51ZBioengineering in the oral cavity: our experience1176-91141178-2013https://doaj.org/article/25166486d3ef4f5d826ec66ac6cd26bd2013-10-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.dovepress.com/bioengineering-in-the-oral-cavity-our-experience-a14632https://doaj.org/toc/1176-9114https://doaj.org/toc/1178-2013L Catalfamo,1 E Belli,2 C Nava,1 E Mici,1 A Calvo,1 B D'Alessandro,1 FS De Ponte1 1Unit of Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Messina, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Policlinico G Martino, Messina, Italy; 2Unit of Maxillofacial Surgery, University Rome Sapienza, Azienda Ospedaliera Sant Andrea, Rome, Italy Background: To date, there are no studies reported in the literature on the possible use of bovine collagen, oxidized regenerated cellulose, or synthetic hyaluronic acid medications in the oral cavity. The aim of this paper is to report the use of bovine collagen, oxidized regenerated cellulose, and synthetic hyaluronic acid medications to improve wound healing in the oral cavity by stimulating granulomatous tissue. Methods: From 2007 to 2011, 80 patients (median age 67 years) suffering from oral mucosal lesions participated in this double-blind study. The patients were divided into two groups, each consisting of 40 patients. One group received conventional medications, while the other group of patients were treated with the advanced medications. Results: Advanced medications allowed re-epithelialization of the wound margin in 2–20 days, whereas patients receiving conventional medication showed a median healing duration of 45 days. Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrate that treating oral mucosal wounds with advanced medication has an advantage with regard to wound healing time, allowing patients to have a rapid, functional, and esthetic recovery. Keywords: bioengineering, oral cavity, mucosal recoveryCatalfamo LBelli ENava CMici ECalvo AD&#39;Alessandro BDe Ponte FSDove Medical PressarticleMedicine (General)R5-920ENInternational Journal of Nanomedicine, Vol 2013, Iss Issue 1, Pp 3883-3886 (2013)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine (General) R5-920
spellingShingle	Medicine (General) R5-920 Catalfamo L Belli E Nava C Mici E Calvo A D&#39;Alessandro B De Ponte FS Bioengineering in the oral cavity: our experience
description	L Catalfamo,1 E Belli,2 C Nava,1 E Mici,1 A Calvo,1 B D'Alessandro,1 FS De Ponte1 1Unit of Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Messina, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Policlinico G Martino, Messina, Italy; 2Unit of Maxillofacial Surgery, University Rome Sapienza, Azienda Ospedaliera Sant Andrea, Rome, Italy Background: To date, there are no studies reported in the literature on the possible use of bovine collagen, oxidized regenerated cellulose, or synthetic hyaluronic acid medications in the oral cavity. The aim of this paper is to report the use of bovine collagen, oxidized regenerated cellulose, and synthetic hyaluronic acid medications to improve wound healing in the oral cavity by stimulating granulomatous tissue. Methods: From 2007 to 2011, 80 patients (median age 67 years) suffering from oral mucosal lesions participated in this double-blind study. The patients were divided into two groups, each consisting of 40 patients. One group received conventional medications, while the other group of patients were treated with the advanced medications. Results: Advanced medications allowed re-epithelialization of the wound margin in 2–20 days, whereas patients receiving conventional medication showed a median healing duration of 45 days. Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrate that treating oral mucosal wounds with advanced medication has an advantage with regard to wound healing time, allowing patients to have a rapid, functional, and esthetic recovery. Keywords: bioengineering, oral cavity, mucosal recovery
format	article
author	Catalfamo L Belli E Nava C Mici E Calvo A D&#39;Alessandro B De Ponte FS
author_facet	Catalfamo L Belli E Nava C Mici E Calvo A D&#39;Alessandro B De Ponte FS
author_sort	Catalfamo L
title	Bioengineering in the oral cavity: our experience
title_short	Bioengineering in the oral cavity: our experience
title_full	Bioengineering in the oral cavity: our experience
title_fullStr	Bioengineering in the oral cavity: our experience
title_full_unstemmed	Bioengineering in the oral cavity: our experience
title_sort	bioengineering in the oral cavity: our experience
publisher	Dove Medical Press
publishDate	2013
url	https://doaj.org/article/25166486d3ef4f5d826ec66ac6cd26bd
work_keys_str_mv	AT catalfamol bioengineeringintheoralcavityourexperience AT bellie bioengineeringintheoralcavityourexperience AT navac bioengineeringintheoralcavityourexperience AT micie bioengineeringintheoralcavityourexperience AT calvoa bioengineeringintheoralcavityourexperience AT damp39alessandrob bioengineeringintheoralcavityourexperience AT depontefs bioengineeringintheoralcavityourexperience
_version_	1718399446126952448

Bioengineering in the oral cavity: our experience

Ejemplares similares