Modern Technology in Geography Education—Attitudes of Pre-Service Teachers of Geography on Modern Technology

In this study, we focus on teachers’ attitudes to compare and evaluate their ability and readiness to implement technology education in geography lessons. First, the lack of suitable measuring instruments for our intent was identified, and we thus attempted to develop the Modern Technology Attitude...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Phillip T. Bengel, Carina Peter
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
L
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2520c0c2e81b4493943e25d4687212b8
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2520c0c2e81b4493943e25d4687212b8
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2520c0c2e81b4493943e25d4687212b82021-11-25T17:23:32ZModern Technology in Geography Education—Attitudes of Pre-Service Teachers of Geography on Modern Technology10.3390/educsci111107082227-7102https://doaj.org/article/2520c0c2e81b4493943e25d4687212b82021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/11/11/708https://doaj.org/toc/2227-7102In this study, we focus on teachers’ attitudes to compare and evaluate their ability and readiness to implement technology education in geography lessons. First, the lack of suitable measuring instruments for our intent was identified, and we thus attempted to develop the Modern Technology Attitude Index (MTAI) for remedy. An exploratory factor analysis helped to identify three distinguishable dimensions that depict areas of intimidation (INT), loss of control (LOC), and benefits and easement (BAE), with or through modern technology. The scales were then applied to German university students (<i>n</i> = 357). As a result, the pre-service geography teachers (<i>n</i> = 72) showed higher scores on the affinity scale than on the two aversion scales. Their subject-specific interest correlated negatively with <i>intimidation</i> and positively with the perceived <i>benefits and easements</i> of modern technology, while the perceived <i>loss of control</i> showed no significant correlation. This allows for the conclusion that the subject’s technology-related interest has an influence on cognitive and behavioral attitudes, while this is not the case for affective ones. Further, there are indications that the much-discussed gender gap in technology topics might particularly be related to people’s affective attitudes, while cognitive and behavioral dimensions seem not to be affected. Differing results in other studies on whether the gender gap still exists or not could be due to the fact that, in addition to growing social awareness and a generational change, the measuring tools used may have not yet been able to depict a sufficiently diverse range of attitudes.Phillip T. BengelCarina PeterMDPI AGarticletechnology educationmodern technologiesgeography teacher educationattitude-studyfactor analysisEducationLENEducation Sciences, Vol 11, Iss 708, p 708 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic technology education
modern technologies
geography teacher education
attitude-study
factor analysis
Education
L
spellingShingle technology education
modern technologies
geography teacher education
attitude-study
factor analysis
Education
L
Phillip T. Bengel
Carina Peter
Modern Technology in Geography Education—Attitudes of Pre-Service Teachers of Geography on Modern Technology
description In this study, we focus on teachers’ attitudes to compare and evaluate their ability and readiness to implement technology education in geography lessons. First, the lack of suitable measuring instruments for our intent was identified, and we thus attempted to develop the Modern Technology Attitude Index (MTAI) for remedy. An exploratory factor analysis helped to identify three distinguishable dimensions that depict areas of intimidation (INT), loss of control (LOC), and benefits and easement (BAE), with or through modern technology. The scales were then applied to German university students (<i>n</i> = 357). As a result, the pre-service geography teachers (<i>n</i> = 72) showed higher scores on the affinity scale than on the two aversion scales. Their subject-specific interest correlated negatively with <i>intimidation</i> and positively with the perceived <i>benefits and easements</i> of modern technology, while the perceived <i>loss of control</i> showed no significant correlation. This allows for the conclusion that the subject’s technology-related interest has an influence on cognitive and behavioral attitudes, while this is not the case for affective ones. Further, there are indications that the much-discussed gender gap in technology topics might particularly be related to people’s affective attitudes, while cognitive and behavioral dimensions seem not to be affected. Differing results in other studies on whether the gender gap still exists or not could be due to the fact that, in addition to growing social awareness and a generational change, the measuring tools used may have not yet been able to depict a sufficiently diverse range of attitudes.
format article
author Phillip T. Bengel
Carina Peter
author_facet Phillip T. Bengel
Carina Peter
author_sort Phillip T. Bengel
title Modern Technology in Geography Education—Attitudes of Pre-Service Teachers of Geography on Modern Technology
title_short Modern Technology in Geography Education—Attitudes of Pre-Service Teachers of Geography on Modern Technology
title_full Modern Technology in Geography Education—Attitudes of Pre-Service Teachers of Geography on Modern Technology
title_fullStr Modern Technology in Geography Education—Attitudes of Pre-Service Teachers of Geography on Modern Technology
title_full_unstemmed Modern Technology in Geography Education—Attitudes of Pre-Service Teachers of Geography on Modern Technology
title_sort modern technology in geography education—attitudes of pre-service teachers of geography on modern technology
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/2520c0c2e81b4493943e25d4687212b8
work_keys_str_mv AT philliptbengel moderntechnologyingeographyeducationattitudesofpreserviceteachersofgeographyonmoderntechnology
AT carinapeter moderntechnologyingeographyeducationattitudesofpreserviceteachersofgeographyonmoderntechnology
_version_ 1718412396369805312