Fasciculation differences between ALS and non-ALS patients: an ultrasound study

Abstract Background Fasciculation is an important sign for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Our study aimed to analyze the difference in fasciculation detected with muscle ultrasonography (MUS) between ALS patients and non-ALS patients with symptoms resembling ALS. Methods Eight...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jingwen Liu, Yi Li, Jingwen Niu, Lei Zhang, Jing Fan, Yuzhou Guan, Liying Cui, Mingsheng Liu
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2526f29eeabe4643b74361734bebdf36
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2526f29eeabe4643b74361734bebdf36
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2526f29eeabe4643b74361734bebdf362021-11-14T12:13:26ZFasciculation differences between ALS and non-ALS patients: an ultrasound study10.1186/s12883-021-02473-51471-2377https://doaj.org/article/2526f29eeabe4643b74361734bebdf362021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02473-5https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2377Abstract Background Fasciculation is an important sign for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Our study aimed to analyze the difference in fasciculation detected with muscle ultrasonography (MUS) between ALS patients and non-ALS patients with symptoms resembling ALS. Methods Eighty-eight ALS patients and fifty-four non-ALS (eight multifocal motor neuropathy, 32 chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy/Charcot-Marie-Tooth, and 14 cervical spondylopathy or lumbar spondylopathy) patients were recruited. MUS was performed on 19 muscle groups in cervical, lumbosacral, bulbar, and thoracic regions for each patient. The intensity of fasciculation was divided into five grades based on firing frequency and number in the involved muscle groups. Results The overall detection rates were 72.8% in ALS and 18% in non-ALS patients. The fasciculation grades (median [IQR]) were 2 (0–3) in ALS and 0 (0–0) in non-ALS patients (P < 0.001). Fasciculations were observed in four regions for ALS patients and primarily distributed in proximal limbs. Fasciculations in non-ALS patients were primarily low-grade and mostly distributed in distal limbs. Discussion The fasciculation grade was higher in ALS than non-ALS patients. The distribution pattern of fasciculation was different between ALS and non-ALS patients. Conclusions The fasciculation grade and distribution pattern detected with MUS could help distinguish ALS from non-ALS patients.Jingwen LiuYi LiJingwen NiuLei ZhangJing FanYuzhou GuanLiying CuiMingsheng LiuBMCarticleAmyotrophic lateral sclerosisFasciculationUltrasonographyPeripheral neuropathyDiagnosisNeurology. Diseases of the nervous systemRC346-429ENBMC Neurology, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Fasciculation
Ultrasonography
Peripheral neuropathy
Diagnosis
Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
RC346-429
spellingShingle Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Fasciculation
Ultrasonography
Peripheral neuropathy
Diagnosis
Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
RC346-429
Jingwen Liu
Yi Li
Jingwen Niu
Lei Zhang
Jing Fan
Yuzhou Guan
Liying Cui
Mingsheng Liu
Fasciculation differences between ALS and non-ALS patients: an ultrasound study
description Abstract Background Fasciculation is an important sign for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Our study aimed to analyze the difference in fasciculation detected with muscle ultrasonography (MUS) between ALS patients and non-ALS patients with symptoms resembling ALS. Methods Eighty-eight ALS patients and fifty-four non-ALS (eight multifocal motor neuropathy, 32 chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy/Charcot-Marie-Tooth, and 14 cervical spondylopathy or lumbar spondylopathy) patients were recruited. MUS was performed on 19 muscle groups in cervical, lumbosacral, bulbar, and thoracic regions for each patient. The intensity of fasciculation was divided into five grades based on firing frequency and number in the involved muscle groups. Results The overall detection rates were 72.8% in ALS and 18% in non-ALS patients. The fasciculation grades (median [IQR]) were 2 (0–3) in ALS and 0 (0–0) in non-ALS patients (P < 0.001). Fasciculations were observed in four regions for ALS patients and primarily distributed in proximal limbs. Fasciculations in non-ALS patients were primarily low-grade and mostly distributed in distal limbs. Discussion The fasciculation grade was higher in ALS than non-ALS patients. The distribution pattern of fasciculation was different between ALS and non-ALS patients. Conclusions The fasciculation grade and distribution pattern detected with MUS could help distinguish ALS from non-ALS patients.
format article
author Jingwen Liu
Yi Li
Jingwen Niu
Lei Zhang
Jing Fan
Yuzhou Guan
Liying Cui
Mingsheng Liu
author_facet Jingwen Liu
Yi Li
Jingwen Niu
Lei Zhang
Jing Fan
Yuzhou Guan
Liying Cui
Mingsheng Liu
author_sort Jingwen Liu
title Fasciculation differences between ALS and non-ALS patients: an ultrasound study
title_short Fasciculation differences between ALS and non-ALS patients: an ultrasound study
title_full Fasciculation differences between ALS and non-ALS patients: an ultrasound study
title_fullStr Fasciculation differences between ALS and non-ALS patients: an ultrasound study
title_full_unstemmed Fasciculation differences between ALS and non-ALS patients: an ultrasound study
title_sort fasciculation differences between als and non-als patients: an ultrasound study
publisher BMC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/2526f29eeabe4643b74361734bebdf36
work_keys_str_mv AT jingwenliu fasciculationdifferencesbetweenalsandnonalspatientsanultrasoundstudy
AT yili fasciculationdifferencesbetweenalsandnonalspatientsanultrasoundstudy
AT jingwenniu fasciculationdifferencesbetweenalsandnonalspatientsanultrasoundstudy
AT leizhang fasciculationdifferencesbetweenalsandnonalspatientsanultrasoundstudy
AT jingfan fasciculationdifferencesbetweenalsandnonalspatientsanultrasoundstudy
AT yuzhouguan fasciculationdifferencesbetweenalsandnonalspatientsanultrasoundstudy
AT liyingcui fasciculationdifferencesbetweenalsandnonalspatientsanultrasoundstudy
AT mingshengliu fasciculationdifferencesbetweenalsandnonalspatientsanultrasoundstudy
_version_ 1718429334938583040