Discordance in HER2 Status in Gastro-esophageal Adenocarcinomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract Trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy is standard of care for HER2 positive advanced gastro-esophageal cancers. The reported prevalence of HER2 discordance between primary tumors and corresponding metastases varies, hampering uniform patient selection for HER2 targeted therapy. This meta-a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: A. Creemers, E. ter Veer, L. de Waal, P. Lodder, G. K. J. Hooijer, N. C. T. van Grieken, M. F. Bijlsma, S. L. Meijer, M. G. H. van Oijen, H. W. M. van Laarhoven
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/256dfbed0fe34b36901003d0614a20f9
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:256dfbed0fe34b36901003d0614a20f9
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:256dfbed0fe34b36901003d0614a20f92021-12-02T11:40:51ZDiscordance in HER2 Status in Gastro-esophageal Adenocarcinomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis10.1038/s41598-017-03304-92045-2322https://doaj.org/article/256dfbed0fe34b36901003d0614a20f92017-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03304-9https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy is standard of care for HER2 positive advanced gastro-esophageal cancers. The reported prevalence of HER2 discordance between primary tumors and corresponding metastases varies, hampering uniform patient selection for HER2 targeted therapy. This meta-analysis explores the influence of HER2 assessment methods on this discordance and investigates the prevalence of HER2 discordance in gastro-esophageal adenocarcinomas. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched until January 2016. Differences in discordance rate between strict and broad(er) definitions of HER2 status were assessed using random-effect pair-wise meta-analysis. Random-effect single-arm meta-analyses were performed to assess HER2 discordance and the prevalence of positive and negative conversion. A significantly lower discordance rate in HER2 status between primary tumors and corresponding metastases was observed using a strict vs. broad definition of HER2 status (RR = 0.58, 95%CI 0.41–0.82), with a pooled discordance rate of 6.2% and 12.2%, respectively. Using the strict definition of HER2 assessment pooled overall discordance was 7% (95%CI 5–10%). The lowest discordance rates between primary tumors and corresponding metastasis are observed when using a strict method of HER2 positivity. Treatment outcomes of different studies will be better comparable if selection of eligible patients for HER2 targeted therapy is based on this strict definition.A. CreemersE. ter VeerL. de WaalP. LodderG. K. J. HooijerN. C. T. van GriekenM. F. BijlsmaS. L. MeijerM. G. H. van OijenH. W. M. van LaarhovenNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
A. Creemers
E. ter Veer
L. de Waal
P. Lodder
G. K. J. Hooijer
N. C. T. van Grieken
M. F. Bijlsma
S. L. Meijer
M. G. H. van Oijen
H. W. M. van Laarhoven
Discordance in HER2 Status in Gastro-esophageal Adenocarcinomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
description Abstract Trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy is standard of care for HER2 positive advanced gastro-esophageal cancers. The reported prevalence of HER2 discordance between primary tumors and corresponding metastases varies, hampering uniform patient selection for HER2 targeted therapy. This meta-analysis explores the influence of HER2 assessment methods on this discordance and investigates the prevalence of HER2 discordance in gastro-esophageal adenocarcinomas. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched until January 2016. Differences in discordance rate between strict and broad(er) definitions of HER2 status were assessed using random-effect pair-wise meta-analysis. Random-effect single-arm meta-analyses were performed to assess HER2 discordance and the prevalence of positive and negative conversion. A significantly lower discordance rate in HER2 status between primary tumors and corresponding metastases was observed using a strict vs. broad definition of HER2 status (RR = 0.58, 95%CI 0.41–0.82), with a pooled discordance rate of 6.2% and 12.2%, respectively. Using the strict definition of HER2 assessment pooled overall discordance was 7% (95%CI 5–10%). The lowest discordance rates between primary tumors and corresponding metastasis are observed when using a strict method of HER2 positivity. Treatment outcomes of different studies will be better comparable if selection of eligible patients for HER2 targeted therapy is based on this strict definition.
format article
author A. Creemers
E. ter Veer
L. de Waal
P. Lodder
G. K. J. Hooijer
N. C. T. van Grieken
M. F. Bijlsma
S. L. Meijer
M. G. H. van Oijen
H. W. M. van Laarhoven
author_facet A. Creemers
E. ter Veer
L. de Waal
P. Lodder
G. K. J. Hooijer
N. C. T. van Grieken
M. F. Bijlsma
S. L. Meijer
M. G. H. van Oijen
H. W. M. van Laarhoven
author_sort A. Creemers
title Discordance in HER2 Status in Gastro-esophageal Adenocarcinomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_short Discordance in HER2 Status in Gastro-esophageal Adenocarcinomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full Discordance in HER2 Status in Gastro-esophageal Adenocarcinomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Discordance in HER2 Status in Gastro-esophageal Adenocarcinomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Discordance in HER2 Status in Gastro-esophageal Adenocarcinomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_sort discordance in her2 status in gastro-esophageal adenocarcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/256dfbed0fe34b36901003d0614a20f9
work_keys_str_mv AT acreemers discordanceinher2statusingastroesophagealadenocarcinomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT eterveer discordanceinher2statusingastroesophagealadenocarcinomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ldewaal discordanceinher2statusingastroesophagealadenocarcinomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT plodder discordanceinher2statusingastroesophagealadenocarcinomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gkjhooijer discordanceinher2statusingastroesophagealadenocarcinomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nctvangrieken discordanceinher2statusingastroesophagealadenocarcinomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mfbijlsma discordanceinher2statusingastroesophagealadenocarcinomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT slmeijer discordanceinher2statusingastroesophagealadenocarcinomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mghvanoijen discordanceinher2statusingastroesophagealadenocarcinomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hwmvanlaarhoven discordanceinher2statusingastroesophagealadenocarcinomasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1718395507959660544