An analysis of signal processing algorithm performance for cortical intrinsic optical signal imaging and strategies for algorithm selection
Abstract Intrinsic Optical Signal (IOS) imaging has been used extensively to examine activity-related changes within the cerebral cortex. A significant technical challenge with IOS imaging is the presence of large noise, artefact components and periodic interference. Signal processing is therefore i...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/256fd4dc9ae5474793548f07416c579a |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:256fd4dc9ae5474793548f07416c579a |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:256fd4dc9ae5474793548f07416c579a2021-12-02T12:31:55ZAn analysis of signal processing algorithm performance for cortical intrinsic optical signal imaging and strategies for algorithm selection10.1038/s41598-017-06864-y2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/256fd4dc9ae5474793548f07416c579a2017-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06864-yhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Intrinsic Optical Signal (IOS) imaging has been used extensively to examine activity-related changes within the cerebral cortex. A significant technical challenge with IOS imaging is the presence of large noise, artefact components and periodic interference. Signal processing is therefore important in obtaining quality IOS imaging results. Several signal processing techniques have been deployed, however, the performance of these approaches for IOS imaging has never been directly compared. The current study aims to compare signal processing techniques that can be used when quantifying stimuli-response IOS imaging data. Data were gathered from the somatosensory cortex of mice following piezoelectric stimulation of the hindlimb. The effectiveness of each technique to remove noise and extract the IOS signal was compared for both spatial and temporal responses. Careful analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of each method were carried out to inform the choice of signal processing for IOS imaging. We conclude that spatial Gaussian filtering is the most effective choices for improving the spatial IOS response, whilst temporal low pass and bandpass filtering produce the best results for producing temporal responses when periodic stimuli are an option. Global signal regression and truncated difference also work well and do not require periodic stimuli.J. A. TurleyK. ZalewskaM. NilssonF. R. WalkerS. J. JohnsonNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-14 (2017) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q J. A. Turley K. Zalewska M. Nilsson F. R. Walker S. J. Johnson An analysis of signal processing algorithm performance for cortical intrinsic optical signal imaging and strategies for algorithm selection |
description |
Abstract Intrinsic Optical Signal (IOS) imaging has been used extensively to examine activity-related changes within the cerebral cortex. A significant technical challenge with IOS imaging is the presence of large noise, artefact components and periodic interference. Signal processing is therefore important in obtaining quality IOS imaging results. Several signal processing techniques have been deployed, however, the performance of these approaches for IOS imaging has never been directly compared. The current study aims to compare signal processing techniques that can be used when quantifying stimuli-response IOS imaging data. Data were gathered from the somatosensory cortex of mice following piezoelectric stimulation of the hindlimb. The effectiveness of each technique to remove noise and extract the IOS signal was compared for both spatial and temporal responses. Careful analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of each method were carried out to inform the choice of signal processing for IOS imaging. We conclude that spatial Gaussian filtering is the most effective choices for improving the spatial IOS response, whilst temporal low pass and bandpass filtering produce the best results for producing temporal responses when periodic stimuli are an option. Global signal regression and truncated difference also work well and do not require periodic stimuli. |
format |
article |
author |
J. A. Turley K. Zalewska M. Nilsson F. R. Walker S. J. Johnson |
author_facet |
J. A. Turley K. Zalewska M. Nilsson F. R. Walker S. J. Johnson |
author_sort |
J. A. Turley |
title |
An analysis of signal processing algorithm performance for cortical intrinsic optical signal imaging and strategies for algorithm selection |
title_short |
An analysis of signal processing algorithm performance for cortical intrinsic optical signal imaging and strategies for algorithm selection |
title_full |
An analysis of signal processing algorithm performance for cortical intrinsic optical signal imaging and strategies for algorithm selection |
title_fullStr |
An analysis of signal processing algorithm performance for cortical intrinsic optical signal imaging and strategies for algorithm selection |
title_full_unstemmed |
An analysis of signal processing algorithm performance for cortical intrinsic optical signal imaging and strategies for algorithm selection |
title_sort |
analysis of signal processing algorithm performance for cortical intrinsic optical signal imaging and strategies for algorithm selection |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/256fd4dc9ae5474793548f07416c579a |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jaturley ananalysisofsignalprocessingalgorithmperformanceforcorticalintrinsicopticalsignalimagingandstrategiesforalgorithmselection AT kzalewska ananalysisofsignalprocessingalgorithmperformanceforcorticalintrinsicopticalsignalimagingandstrategiesforalgorithmselection AT mnilsson ananalysisofsignalprocessingalgorithmperformanceforcorticalintrinsicopticalsignalimagingandstrategiesforalgorithmselection AT frwalker ananalysisofsignalprocessingalgorithmperformanceforcorticalintrinsicopticalsignalimagingandstrategiesforalgorithmselection AT sjjohnson ananalysisofsignalprocessingalgorithmperformanceforcorticalintrinsicopticalsignalimagingandstrategiesforalgorithmselection AT jaturley analysisofsignalprocessingalgorithmperformanceforcorticalintrinsicopticalsignalimagingandstrategiesforalgorithmselection AT kzalewska analysisofsignalprocessingalgorithmperformanceforcorticalintrinsicopticalsignalimagingandstrategiesforalgorithmselection AT mnilsson analysisofsignalprocessingalgorithmperformanceforcorticalintrinsicopticalsignalimagingandstrategiesforalgorithmselection AT frwalker analysisofsignalprocessingalgorithmperformanceforcorticalintrinsicopticalsignalimagingandstrategiesforalgorithmselection AT sjjohnson analysisofsignalprocessingalgorithmperformanceforcorticalintrinsicopticalsignalimagingandstrategiesforalgorithmselection |
_version_ |
1718394205657628672 |