Formation of Parliamentarism in the Context of Criticism of His Nature
In the article parliamentarism bases in the context of criticism of his principles are discussed. The parliament represents the historical phenomenon, which is given rise from spirit of a discussion and publicity. His emergence is not connected with democracy. The parliament is a point of impact of...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN RU |
| Publicado: |
North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/2588cd2a48524009ad8ee70e0a94ecd4 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:2588cd2a48524009ad8ee70e0a94ecd4 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:2588cd2a48524009ad8ee70e0a94ecd42021-11-12T10:46:04ZFormation of Parliamentarism in the Context of Criticism of His Nature1726-11391816-859010.22394/1726-1139-2017-8-21-28https://doaj.org/article/2588cd2a48524009ad8ee70e0a94ecd42018-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/632https://doaj.org/toc/1726-1139https://doaj.org/toc/1816-8590In the article parliamentarism bases in the context of criticism of his principles are discussed. The parliament represents the historical phenomenon, which is given rise from spirit of a discussion and publicity. His emergence is not connected with democracy. The parliament is a point of impact of power groups for clarification of the positions, which are not giving in to decisions of the state law. Becoming the most important institute of the state, the parliament has no sufficient legitimacy yet. The public contract with the people gives the required legitimacy to parliament, by means of his communication with the natural law. Connection of democracy with parliamentarism has contradictory character. The true attributes of a discussion consign to the past, and her place is taken by promotion and accounting of interests, from the point of view of K. Schmitt. On the other hand, the spirit of parliamentarism will transform sense of justice and the political culture of society at the heart of which indissoluble communication with publicity and a discussion is found again. The criticism of parliamentarism opens its deeper bases and is proved that the nature of political reality assumes political representation.Andrey Anatolyevich ZaikinNorth-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration articleparliamentcriticism of parliamentarismliberalismdemocracydebatepublicitypolitical representationthe political battlePolitical institutions and public administration (General)JF20-2112ENRUУправленческое консультирование, Vol 0, Iss 8, Pp 21-28 (2018) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN RU |
| topic |
parliament criticism of parliamentarism liberalism democracy debate publicity political representation the political battle Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112 |
| spellingShingle |
parliament criticism of parliamentarism liberalism democracy debate publicity political representation the political battle Political institutions and public administration (General) JF20-2112 Andrey Anatolyevich Zaikin Formation of Parliamentarism in the Context of Criticism of His Nature |
| description |
In the article parliamentarism bases in the context of criticism of his principles are discussed. The parliament represents the historical phenomenon, which is given rise from spirit of a discussion and publicity. His emergence is not connected with democracy. The parliament is a point of impact of power groups for clarification of the positions, which are not giving in to decisions of the state law. Becoming the most important institute of the state, the parliament has no sufficient legitimacy yet. The public contract with the people gives the required legitimacy to parliament, by means of his communication with the natural law. Connection of democracy with parliamentarism has contradictory character. The true attributes of a discussion consign to the past, and her place is taken by promotion and accounting of interests, from the point of view of K. Schmitt. On the other hand, the spirit of parliamentarism will transform sense of justice and the political culture of society at the heart of which indissoluble communication with publicity and a discussion is found again. The criticism of parliamentarism opens its deeper bases and is proved that the nature of political reality assumes political representation. |
| format |
article |
| author |
Andrey Anatolyevich Zaikin |
| author_facet |
Andrey Anatolyevich Zaikin |
| author_sort |
Andrey Anatolyevich Zaikin |
| title |
Formation of Parliamentarism in the Context of Criticism of His Nature |
| title_short |
Formation of Parliamentarism in the Context of Criticism of His Nature |
| title_full |
Formation of Parliamentarism in the Context of Criticism of His Nature |
| title_fullStr |
Formation of Parliamentarism in the Context of Criticism of His Nature |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Formation of Parliamentarism in the Context of Criticism of His Nature |
| title_sort |
formation of parliamentarism in the context of criticism of his nature |
| publisher |
North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/2588cd2a48524009ad8ee70e0a94ecd4 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT andreyanatolyevichzaikin formationofparliamentarisminthecontextofcriticismofhisnature |
| _version_ |
1718430852797431808 |