Is Bodyweight-Based Dosing Truly Better Than Flat Dosing for Panitumumab? [Response to Letter]
Michael Z Liao,1 Johannes Kast,1 Marloes Berkhout,2 Hans Prenen,3 Sandeep Dutta,4 Vijay V Upreti1 1Clinical Pharmacology, Modeling & Simulation, Amgen Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA; 2Amgen B.V., Breda, the Netherlands; 3Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium; 4Clinical Pharmacolog...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/25ece9ce343c4273bcedfe4dba212823 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:25ece9ce343c4273bcedfe4dba212823 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:25ece9ce343c4273bcedfe4dba2128232021-12-02T16:10:55ZIs Bodyweight-Based Dosing Truly Better Than Flat Dosing for Panitumumab? [Response to Letter]1179-1438https://doaj.org/article/25ece9ce343c4273bcedfe4dba2128232020-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/response-is-bodyweight-based-dosing-truly-better-than-flat-dosing-for--peer-reviewed-article-CPAAhttps://doaj.org/toc/1179-1438Michael Z Liao,1 Johannes Kast,1 Marloes Berkhout,2 Hans Prenen,3 Sandeep Dutta,4 Vijay V Upreti1 1Clinical Pharmacology, Modeling & Simulation, Amgen Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA; 2Amgen B.V., Breda, the Netherlands; 3Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium; 4Clinical Pharmacology, Modeling & Simulation, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USACorrespondence: Vijay V UpretiClinical Pharmacology, Modeling & Simulation, Amgen, 1120 Veterans Boulevard, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USAEmail vupreti@amgen.com Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the letter by Dr. Hendrikx and colleagues. We wish to thank Dr. Hendrikx and colleagues for their interest in our recent publication by Liao et al1 and their comments about the optimal dosing regimen for panitumumab. The body weight-based dosing, 6 mg/kg once every two-week (Q2W) regimen, for panitumumab as an optimal dosing regimen is fully supported by clinical study data and pharmacokinetic modeling and simulations.2 View the original paper by Liao and colleagues This is in response to the Letter to the EditorLiao MZKast JBerkhout MPrenen HDutta SUpreti VVDove Medical Pressarticlepanitumumabpharmacokineticsdose-exposure relationshipbody weightarea under the curvecolorectal neoplasmsTherapeutics. PharmacologyRM1-950ENClinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications, Vol Volume 12, Pp 189-190 (2020) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
panitumumab pharmacokinetics dose-exposure relationship body weight area under the curve colorectal neoplasms Therapeutics. Pharmacology RM1-950 |
spellingShingle |
panitumumab pharmacokinetics dose-exposure relationship body weight area under the curve colorectal neoplasms Therapeutics. Pharmacology RM1-950 Liao MZ Kast J Berkhout M Prenen H Dutta S Upreti VV Is Bodyweight-Based Dosing Truly Better Than Flat Dosing for Panitumumab? [Response to Letter] |
description |
Michael Z Liao,1 Johannes Kast,1 Marloes Berkhout,2 Hans Prenen,3 Sandeep Dutta,4 Vijay V Upreti1 1Clinical Pharmacology, Modeling & Simulation, Amgen Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA; 2Amgen B.V., Breda, the Netherlands; 3Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium; 4Clinical Pharmacology, Modeling & Simulation, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USACorrespondence: Vijay V UpretiClinical Pharmacology, Modeling & Simulation, Amgen, 1120 Veterans Boulevard, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USAEmail vupreti@amgen.com
Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the letter by Dr. Hendrikx and colleagues.
We wish to thank Dr. Hendrikx and colleagues for their interest in our recent publication by Liao et al1 and their comments about the optimal dosing regimen for panitumumab.
The body weight-based dosing, 6 mg/kg once every two-week (Q2W) regimen, for panitumumab as an optimal dosing regimen is fully supported by clinical study data and pharmacokinetic modeling and simulations.2
View the original paper by Liao and colleagues
This is in response to the Letter to the Editor |
format |
article |
author |
Liao MZ Kast J Berkhout M Prenen H Dutta S Upreti VV |
author_facet |
Liao MZ Kast J Berkhout M Prenen H Dutta S Upreti VV |
author_sort |
Liao MZ |
title |
Is Bodyweight-Based Dosing Truly Better Than Flat Dosing for Panitumumab? [Response to Letter] |
title_short |
Is Bodyweight-Based Dosing Truly Better Than Flat Dosing for Panitumumab? [Response to Letter] |
title_full |
Is Bodyweight-Based Dosing Truly Better Than Flat Dosing for Panitumumab? [Response to Letter] |
title_fullStr |
Is Bodyweight-Based Dosing Truly Better Than Flat Dosing for Panitumumab? [Response to Letter] |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is Bodyweight-Based Dosing Truly Better Than Flat Dosing for Panitumumab? [Response to Letter] |
title_sort |
is bodyweight-based dosing truly better than flat dosing for panitumumab? [response to letter] |
publisher |
Dove Medical Press |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/25ece9ce343c4273bcedfe4dba212823 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT liaomz isbodyweightbaseddosingtrulybetterthanflatdosingforpanitumumabresponsetoletter AT kastj isbodyweightbaseddosingtrulybetterthanflatdosingforpanitumumabresponsetoletter AT berkhoutm isbodyweightbaseddosingtrulybetterthanflatdosingforpanitumumabresponsetoletter AT prenenh isbodyweightbaseddosingtrulybetterthanflatdosingforpanitumumabresponsetoletter AT duttas isbodyweightbaseddosingtrulybetterthanflatdosingforpanitumumabresponsetoletter AT upretivv isbodyweightbaseddosingtrulybetterthanflatdosingforpanitumumabresponsetoletter |
_version_ |
1718384397914210304 |