Mode I Critical Stress Intensity Factor of Beech Wood (Fagus Sylvatica) in a TL Configuration: A Comparison of Different Methods

The paper presents a comparison between various methods of mode I critical stress intensity factor KIC calculations of beech wood in the TL configuration. The first method is the stress intensity factor extrapolation to the distance of 0 mm from the crack tip; the second method is the use of the J i...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Miran Merhar, Dominika Gornik Bučar, Bojan Buča
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/25f226bcebdb4f7d99806e1d6880ec19
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:25f226bcebdb4f7d99806e1d6880ec19
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:25f226bcebdb4f7d99806e1d6880ec192021-12-02T02:21:22ZMode I Critical Stress Intensity Factor of Beech Wood (Fagus Sylvatica) in a TL Configuration: A Comparison of Different Methods10.5552/drind.2013.12530012-67721847-1153https://doaj.org/article/25f226bcebdb4f7d99806e1d6880ec192013-09-01T00:00:00Zhttp://hrcak.srce.hr/file/159336https://doaj.org/toc/0012-6772https://doaj.org/toc/1847-1153The paper presents a comparison between various methods of mode I critical stress intensity factor KIC calculations of beech wood in the TL configuration. The first method is the stress intensity factor extrapolation to the distance of 0 mm from the crack tip; the second method is the use of the J integral; and the third method is based on the differences in deformation energies from which the strain energy release rate per unit of crack propagation length was obtained. The fourth method is the calculation of material deformation around the crack or the displacement of the triangle element node; and the fifth method uses a generally known equation for the CT specimen for plane-strain conditions in isotropic material. Using the finite element method, it was found that the J integral was least sensitive to the size and shape of the elements. It was used to calculate the critical stress intensity factor KIC for beech wood in a TL configuration. The average value is 0.56 MPa√m with a standard deviation of 0.047 MPa√m.Miran Merhar, Dominika Gornik Bučar, Bojan BučaMiran Merhar, Dominika Gornik Bučar, Bojan BučaMiran Merhar, Dominika Gornik Bučar, Bojan BučaUniversity of Zagreb, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technologyarticlefracture toughnessmode I critical stress intensity factorfracture mechanicsbeech woodForestrySD1-669.5ENDrvna Industrija, Vol 64, Iss 3, Pp 221-229 (2013)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic fracture toughness
mode I critical stress intensity factor
fracture mechanics
beech wood
Forestry
SD1-669.5
spellingShingle fracture toughness
mode I critical stress intensity factor
fracture mechanics
beech wood
Forestry
SD1-669.5
Miran Merhar, Dominika Gornik Bučar, Bojan Buča
Miran Merhar, Dominika Gornik Bučar, Bojan Buča
Miran Merhar, Dominika Gornik Bučar, Bojan Buča
Mode I Critical Stress Intensity Factor of Beech Wood (Fagus Sylvatica) in a TL Configuration: A Comparison of Different Methods
description The paper presents a comparison between various methods of mode I critical stress intensity factor KIC calculations of beech wood in the TL configuration. The first method is the stress intensity factor extrapolation to the distance of 0 mm from the crack tip; the second method is the use of the J integral; and the third method is based on the differences in deformation energies from which the strain energy release rate per unit of crack propagation length was obtained. The fourth method is the calculation of material deformation around the crack or the displacement of the triangle element node; and the fifth method uses a generally known equation for the CT specimen for plane-strain conditions in isotropic material. Using the finite element method, it was found that the J integral was least sensitive to the size and shape of the elements. It was used to calculate the critical stress intensity factor KIC for beech wood in a TL configuration. The average value is 0.56 MPa√m with a standard deviation of 0.047 MPa√m.
format article
author Miran Merhar, Dominika Gornik Bučar, Bojan Buča
Miran Merhar, Dominika Gornik Bučar, Bojan Buča
Miran Merhar, Dominika Gornik Bučar, Bojan Buča
author_facet Miran Merhar, Dominika Gornik Bučar, Bojan Buča
Miran Merhar, Dominika Gornik Bučar, Bojan Buča
Miran Merhar, Dominika Gornik Bučar, Bojan Buča
author_sort Miran Merhar, Dominika Gornik Bučar, Bojan Buča
title Mode I Critical Stress Intensity Factor of Beech Wood (Fagus Sylvatica) in a TL Configuration: A Comparison of Different Methods
title_short Mode I Critical Stress Intensity Factor of Beech Wood (Fagus Sylvatica) in a TL Configuration: A Comparison of Different Methods
title_full Mode I Critical Stress Intensity Factor of Beech Wood (Fagus Sylvatica) in a TL Configuration: A Comparison of Different Methods
title_fullStr Mode I Critical Stress Intensity Factor of Beech Wood (Fagus Sylvatica) in a TL Configuration: A Comparison of Different Methods
title_full_unstemmed Mode I Critical Stress Intensity Factor of Beech Wood (Fagus Sylvatica) in a TL Configuration: A Comparison of Different Methods
title_sort mode i critical stress intensity factor of beech wood (fagus sylvatica) in a tl configuration: a comparison of different methods
publisher University of Zagreb, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology
publishDate 2013
url https://doaj.org/article/25f226bcebdb4f7d99806e1d6880ec19
work_keys_str_mv AT miranmerhardominikagornikbucarbojanbuca modeicriticalstressintensityfactorofbeechwoodfagussylvaticainatlconfigurationacomparisonofdifferentmethods
AT miranmerhardominikagornikbucarbojanbuca modeicriticalstressintensityfactorofbeechwoodfagussylvaticainatlconfigurationacomparisonofdifferentmethods
AT miranmerhardominikagornikbucarbojanbuca modeicriticalstressintensityfactorofbeechwoodfagussylvaticainatlconfigurationacomparisonofdifferentmethods
_version_ 1718402516851359744