Oral Impacts of Aligners versus Fixed Self-Ligating Lingual Orthodontic Appliances

The aim of this prospective study was to compare a fixed lingual orthodontic appliance with a commonly used aligner system, focusing on oral impacts and speech disturbances, during the first 3 months of orthodontic treatment. Two groups of adults were evaluated: 21 treated with Invisalign<sup>...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gerassimos G. Angelopoulos, Panagiotis Kanarelis, Georgia Vagdouti, Ageliki Zavlanou, Iosif Sifakakis
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
T
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/264bb3dc2167429aa07b6e9aa5c42761
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:264bb3dc2167429aa07b6e9aa5c42761
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:264bb3dc2167429aa07b6e9aa5c427612021-11-11T15:08:39ZOral Impacts of Aligners versus Fixed Self-Ligating Lingual Orthodontic Appliances10.3390/app1121100742076-3417https://doaj.org/article/264bb3dc2167429aa07b6e9aa5c427612021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/21/10074https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3417The aim of this prospective study was to compare a fixed lingual orthodontic appliance with a commonly used aligner system, focusing on oral impacts and speech disturbances, during the first 3 months of orthodontic treatment. Two groups of adults were evaluated: 21 treated with Invisalign<sup>®</sup> and 26 with In-Ovation L<sup>®</sup> lingual brackets. Health-related quality of life questionnaires were used to assess the oral impacts, and speech samples were collected for speech evaluation by professionals. The levels of pain and painkiller intake were similar, increasing on the first day, and decreasing at 3 months. Subtle injuries on the lip and cheeks were initially reported in the aligner group. Lingual patients experienced more discomfort in swallowing and opening the mouth, tongue injuries and food residues, even at 3 months. The consonants “s” and “z” were mainly affected in both groups immediately after appliance insertion, but more often in the aligner group. These speech disturbances recovered in the following 3 months. In conclusion, both groups reported disturbances in quality-of-life measures; however, patients wearing lingual appliances experienced more disturbances, which persisted after three months. Speech disturbances were slightly more pronounced in the aligner group and recovered after three months.Gerassimos G. AngelopoulosPanagiotis KanarelisGeorgia VagdoutiAgeliki ZavlanouIosif SifakakisMDPI AGarticleorthodonticlingualalignersquality of lifespeechTechnologyTEngineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040Biology (General)QH301-705.5PhysicsQC1-999ChemistryQD1-999ENApplied Sciences, Vol 11, Iss 10074, p 10074 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic orthodontic
lingual
aligners
quality of life
speech
Technology
T
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Physics
QC1-999
Chemistry
QD1-999
spellingShingle orthodontic
lingual
aligners
quality of life
speech
Technology
T
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Physics
QC1-999
Chemistry
QD1-999
Gerassimos G. Angelopoulos
Panagiotis Kanarelis
Georgia Vagdouti
Ageliki Zavlanou
Iosif Sifakakis
Oral Impacts of Aligners versus Fixed Self-Ligating Lingual Orthodontic Appliances
description The aim of this prospective study was to compare a fixed lingual orthodontic appliance with a commonly used aligner system, focusing on oral impacts and speech disturbances, during the first 3 months of orthodontic treatment. Two groups of adults were evaluated: 21 treated with Invisalign<sup>®</sup> and 26 with In-Ovation L<sup>®</sup> lingual brackets. Health-related quality of life questionnaires were used to assess the oral impacts, and speech samples were collected for speech evaluation by professionals. The levels of pain and painkiller intake were similar, increasing on the first day, and decreasing at 3 months. Subtle injuries on the lip and cheeks were initially reported in the aligner group. Lingual patients experienced more discomfort in swallowing and opening the mouth, tongue injuries and food residues, even at 3 months. The consonants “s” and “z” were mainly affected in both groups immediately after appliance insertion, but more often in the aligner group. These speech disturbances recovered in the following 3 months. In conclusion, both groups reported disturbances in quality-of-life measures; however, patients wearing lingual appliances experienced more disturbances, which persisted after three months. Speech disturbances were slightly more pronounced in the aligner group and recovered after three months.
format article
author Gerassimos G. Angelopoulos
Panagiotis Kanarelis
Georgia Vagdouti
Ageliki Zavlanou
Iosif Sifakakis
author_facet Gerassimos G. Angelopoulos
Panagiotis Kanarelis
Georgia Vagdouti
Ageliki Zavlanou
Iosif Sifakakis
author_sort Gerassimos G. Angelopoulos
title Oral Impacts of Aligners versus Fixed Self-Ligating Lingual Orthodontic Appliances
title_short Oral Impacts of Aligners versus Fixed Self-Ligating Lingual Orthodontic Appliances
title_full Oral Impacts of Aligners versus Fixed Self-Ligating Lingual Orthodontic Appliances
title_fullStr Oral Impacts of Aligners versus Fixed Self-Ligating Lingual Orthodontic Appliances
title_full_unstemmed Oral Impacts of Aligners versus Fixed Self-Ligating Lingual Orthodontic Appliances
title_sort oral impacts of aligners versus fixed self-ligating lingual orthodontic appliances
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/264bb3dc2167429aa07b6e9aa5c42761
work_keys_str_mv AT gerassimosgangelopoulos oralimpactsofalignersversusfixedselfligatinglingualorthodonticappliances
AT panagiotiskanarelis oralimpactsofalignersversusfixedselfligatinglingualorthodonticappliances
AT georgiavagdouti oralimpactsofalignersversusfixedselfligatinglingualorthodonticappliances
AT agelikizavlanou oralimpactsofalignersversusfixedselfligatinglingualorthodonticappliances
AT iosifsifakakis oralimpactsofalignersversusfixedselfligatinglingualorthodonticappliances
_version_ 1718437113195659264