Diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for tuberculous pericarditis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
<h4>Objective</h4>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of Xpert MTB/RIF for tuberculous pericarditis (TBP).<h4>Methods</h4>We searched relevant databases for Xpert MTB/RIF for TBP diagnosis until April 2021 and screened eligible studies for study...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/26a03a73e5d548a6a64f9749b9875a5e |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:26a03a73e5d548a6a64f9749b9875a5e |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:26a03a73e5d548a6a64f9749b9875a5e2021-12-02T20:14:41ZDiagnostic accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for tuberculous pericarditis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0257220https://doaj.org/article/26a03a73e5d548a6a64f9749b9875a5e2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257220https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Objective</h4>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of Xpert MTB/RIF for tuberculous pericarditis (TBP).<h4>Methods</h4>We searched relevant databases for Xpert MTB/RIF for TBP diagnosis until April 2021 and screened eligible studies for study inclusion. We evaluated the effectiveness of Xpert MTB/RIF when the composite reference standard (CRS) and mycobacterial culture were the gold standards, respectively. We performed meta-analyses using a bivariate random-effects model, and when the heterogeneity was obvious, the source of heterogeneity was further discussed.<h4>Results</h4>We included seven independent studies comparing Xpert MTB/RIF with the CRS and six studies comparing it with culture. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve of Xpert MTB/RIF were 65% (95% confidence interval, 59-72%), 99% (97-100%), and 0.99 (0.97-0.99) as compared with the CRS, respectively, and 75% (53-88%), 99% (90-100%), and 0.94 (0.92-0.96) as compared with culture, respectively. There was no significant heterogeneity between studies when CRS was the gold standard, whereas heterogeneity was evident when culture was the gold standard.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF for diagnosing TBP was moderate and the specificity was good; thus, Xpert MTB/RIF can be used in the initial diagnosis of TBP.Guocan YuFangming ZhongYanqin ShenHong ZhengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 9, p e0257220 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Guocan Yu Fangming Zhong Yanqin Shen Hong Zheng Diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for tuberculous pericarditis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. |
description |
<h4>Objective</h4>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of Xpert MTB/RIF for tuberculous pericarditis (TBP).<h4>Methods</h4>We searched relevant databases for Xpert MTB/RIF for TBP diagnosis until April 2021 and screened eligible studies for study inclusion. We evaluated the effectiveness of Xpert MTB/RIF when the composite reference standard (CRS) and mycobacterial culture were the gold standards, respectively. We performed meta-analyses using a bivariate random-effects model, and when the heterogeneity was obvious, the source of heterogeneity was further discussed.<h4>Results</h4>We included seven independent studies comparing Xpert MTB/RIF with the CRS and six studies comparing it with culture. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve of Xpert MTB/RIF were 65% (95% confidence interval, 59-72%), 99% (97-100%), and 0.99 (0.97-0.99) as compared with the CRS, respectively, and 75% (53-88%), 99% (90-100%), and 0.94 (0.92-0.96) as compared with culture, respectively. There was no significant heterogeneity between studies when CRS was the gold standard, whereas heterogeneity was evident when culture was the gold standard.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF for diagnosing TBP was moderate and the specificity was good; thus, Xpert MTB/RIF can be used in the initial diagnosis of TBP. |
format |
article |
author |
Guocan Yu Fangming Zhong Yanqin Shen Hong Zheng |
author_facet |
Guocan Yu Fangming Zhong Yanqin Shen Hong Zheng |
author_sort |
Guocan Yu |
title |
Diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for tuberculous pericarditis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. |
title_short |
Diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for tuberculous pericarditis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. |
title_full |
Diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for tuberculous pericarditis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. |
title_fullStr |
Diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for tuberculous pericarditis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for tuberculous pericarditis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. |
title_sort |
diagnostic accuracy of the xpert mtb/rif assay for tuberculous pericarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/26a03a73e5d548a6a64f9749b9875a5e |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT guocanyu diagnosticaccuracyofthexpertmtbrifassayfortuberculouspericarditisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fangmingzhong diagnosticaccuracyofthexpertmtbrifassayfortuberculouspericarditisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yanqinshen diagnosticaccuracyofthexpertmtbrifassayfortuberculouspericarditisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hongzheng diagnosticaccuracyofthexpertmtbrifassayfortuberculouspericarditisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |
_version_ |
1718374633399386112 |