Does ischemic preconditioning really improve performance or it is just a placebo effect?

This study examined the effects of a simultaneous ischemic preconditioning (IPC) and SHAM intervention to reduce the placebo effect due to a priori expectation on the performance of knee extension resistance exercise. Nine moderately trained men were tested in three different occasions. Following th...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hiago L R de Souza, Rhaí A Arriel, Gustavo R Mota, Rodrigo Hohl, Moacir Marocolo
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2717fcf3a21b4b13993ee1cdfa50ded7
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2717fcf3a21b4b13993ee1cdfa50ded7
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2717fcf3a21b4b13993ee1cdfa50ded72021-12-02T20:05:43ZDoes ischemic preconditioning really improve performance or it is just a placebo effect?1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0250572https://doaj.org/article/2717fcf3a21b4b13993ee1cdfa50ded72021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250572https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203This study examined the effects of a simultaneous ischemic preconditioning (IPC) and SHAM intervention to reduce the placebo effect due to a priori expectation on the performance of knee extension resistance exercise. Nine moderately trained men were tested in three different occasions. Following the baseline tests, subjects performed a first set of leg extension tests after the IPC (3 X 5 min 50 mmHg above systolic blood pressure) on right thigh and the SHAM (same as IPC, but 20 mmHg) on left thigh. After 48 hours, the subjects performed another set of tests with the opposite applications. Number of repetitions, maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) and perceptual indicators were analyzed. After IPC and SHAM intervention performed at the same time, similar results were observed for the number of repetitions, with no significant differences between conditions (baseline x IPC x SHAM) for either left (p = 0.274) or right thigh (p = 0.242). The fatigue index and volume load did not show significant effect size after IPC and SHAM maneuvers. In contrast, significant reduction on left tight MVIC was observed (p = 0.001) in SHAM and IPC compared to baseline, but not for right thigh (p = 0.106). Results from the current study may indicate that applying IPC prior to a set of leg extension does not result in ergogenic effects. The placebo effect seems to be related to this technique and its dissociation seems unlikely, therefore including a SHAM or placebo group in IPC studies is strongly recommended.Hiago L R de SouzaRhaí A ArrielGustavo R MotaRodrigo HohlMoacir MarocoloPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 5, p e0250572 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Hiago L R de Souza
Rhaí A Arriel
Gustavo R Mota
Rodrigo Hohl
Moacir Marocolo
Does ischemic preconditioning really improve performance or it is just a placebo effect?
description This study examined the effects of a simultaneous ischemic preconditioning (IPC) and SHAM intervention to reduce the placebo effect due to a priori expectation on the performance of knee extension resistance exercise. Nine moderately trained men were tested in three different occasions. Following the baseline tests, subjects performed a first set of leg extension tests after the IPC (3 X 5 min 50 mmHg above systolic blood pressure) on right thigh and the SHAM (same as IPC, but 20 mmHg) on left thigh. After 48 hours, the subjects performed another set of tests with the opposite applications. Number of repetitions, maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) and perceptual indicators were analyzed. After IPC and SHAM intervention performed at the same time, similar results were observed for the number of repetitions, with no significant differences between conditions (baseline x IPC x SHAM) for either left (p = 0.274) or right thigh (p = 0.242). The fatigue index and volume load did not show significant effect size after IPC and SHAM maneuvers. In contrast, significant reduction on left tight MVIC was observed (p = 0.001) in SHAM and IPC compared to baseline, but not for right thigh (p = 0.106). Results from the current study may indicate that applying IPC prior to a set of leg extension does not result in ergogenic effects. The placebo effect seems to be related to this technique and its dissociation seems unlikely, therefore including a SHAM or placebo group in IPC studies is strongly recommended.
format article
author Hiago L R de Souza
Rhaí A Arriel
Gustavo R Mota
Rodrigo Hohl
Moacir Marocolo
author_facet Hiago L R de Souza
Rhaí A Arriel
Gustavo R Mota
Rodrigo Hohl
Moacir Marocolo
author_sort Hiago L R de Souza
title Does ischemic preconditioning really improve performance or it is just a placebo effect?
title_short Does ischemic preconditioning really improve performance or it is just a placebo effect?
title_full Does ischemic preconditioning really improve performance or it is just a placebo effect?
title_fullStr Does ischemic preconditioning really improve performance or it is just a placebo effect?
title_full_unstemmed Does ischemic preconditioning really improve performance or it is just a placebo effect?
title_sort does ischemic preconditioning really improve performance or it is just a placebo effect?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/2717fcf3a21b4b13993ee1cdfa50ded7
work_keys_str_mv AT hiagolrdesouza doesischemicpreconditioningreallyimproveperformanceoritisjustaplaceboeffect
AT rhaiaarriel doesischemicpreconditioningreallyimproveperformanceoritisjustaplaceboeffect
AT gustavormota doesischemicpreconditioningreallyimproveperformanceoritisjustaplaceboeffect
AT rodrigohohl doesischemicpreconditioningreallyimproveperformanceoritisjustaplaceboeffect
AT moacirmarocolo doesischemicpreconditioningreallyimproveperformanceoritisjustaplaceboeffect
_version_ 1718375412115963904