Comparison of different computer speeds in calculating of Co 60 depth doses by MCNP4A and MCNP4B Monte Carlo codes

Background and Objective: MCNP is a general-purpose Monte Carlo code that is used for simulating of neutrons, photons and electrons transport in different media. Recently this code has been used for radiotherapy dosimetry and treatment planning. In recent investigations, the reasonable run-time was...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: A Mesbahi, R Mahdavi, M Allahverdi
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
FA
Publicado: Babol University of Medical Sciences 2004
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/272a19c40c0349859ec3ec33e2cfeb51
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:272a19c40c0349859ec3ec33e2cfeb51
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:272a19c40c0349859ec3ec33e2cfeb512021-11-10T09:16:12ZComparison of different computer speeds in calculating of Co 60 depth doses by MCNP4A and MCNP4B Monte Carlo codes1561-41072251-7170https://doaj.org/article/272a19c40c0349859ec3ec33e2cfeb512004-07-01T00:00:00Zhttp://jbums.org/article-1-2675-en.htmlhttps://doaj.org/toc/1561-4107https://doaj.org/toc/2251-7170Background and Objective: MCNP is a general-purpose Monte Carlo code that is used for simulating of neutrons, photons and electrons transport in different media. Recently this code has been used for radiotherapy dosimetry and treatment planning. In recent investigations, the reasonable run-time was not acquired for clinical use of Monte Carlo method. In this research, the speeds of the computers available in Iran were compared in running a percent depth dose calculation (PPD) for CO60 teletherapy machine. Methods: Geometry of a typical CO60 teletherapy machine and a water phantom were simulated. Both version of MCNP code were installed on Pentium 233, 866, 1500 MHz, 700 MHz Duran and Athelon 1333MHz personal computers. Percent depth dose of CO60 gamma rays in water phantom for 10×10 cm was calculated by each computer. Findings: The time required to computer the PDD by F6 tally was 60 times greater than the F8 tally. In all the cases, the 4A version was approximately 5% faster than 4B version. This suggests that in radiotherapy application like our test problem there is not considerable computing time difference between 4A and 4B version. Conclusion: The results recommend the use of F6 tally in radiotherapy application by CO60 gamma rays where the point of interest are not situated in electronic disequilibrium regions and when the time of calculation is important.A MesbahiR MahdaviM AllahverdiBabol University of Medical Sciencesarticlemonte carlo simulationmcnpradiotherapy dosimetrydepth doseMedicineRMedicine (General)R5-920ENFAMajallah-i Dānishgāh-i ̒Ulūm-i Pizishkī-i Bābul, Vol 6, Iss 3, Pp 7-11 (2004)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
FA
topic monte carlo simulation
mcnp
radiotherapy dosimetry
depth dose
Medicine
R
Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle monte carlo simulation
mcnp
radiotherapy dosimetry
depth dose
Medicine
R
Medicine (General)
R5-920
A Mesbahi
R Mahdavi
M Allahverdi
Comparison of different computer speeds in calculating of Co 60 depth doses by MCNP4A and MCNP4B Monte Carlo codes
description Background and Objective: MCNP is a general-purpose Monte Carlo code that is used for simulating of neutrons, photons and electrons transport in different media. Recently this code has been used for radiotherapy dosimetry and treatment planning. In recent investigations, the reasonable run-time was not acquired for clinical use of Monte Carlo method. In this research, the speeds of the computers available in Iran were compared in running a percent depth dose calculation (PPD) for CO60 teletherapy machine. Methods: Geometry of a typical CO60 teletherapy machine and a water phantom were simulated. Both version of MCNP code were installed on Pentium 233, 866, 1500 MHz, 700 MHz Duran and Athelon 1333MHz personal computers. Percent depth dose of CO60 gamma rays in water phantom for 10×10 cm was calculated by each computer. Findings: The time required to computer the PDD by F6 tally was 60 times greater than the F8 tally. In all the cases, the 4A version was approximately 5% faster than 4B version. This suggests that in radiotherapy application like our test problem there is not considerable computing time difference between 4A and 4B version. Conclusion: The results recommend the use of F6 tally in radiotherapy application by CO60 gamma rays where the point of interest are not situated in electronic disequilibrium regions and when the time of calculation is important.
format article
author A Mesbahi
R Mahdavi
M Allahverdi
author_facet A Mesbahi
R Mahdavi
M Allahverdi
author_sort A Mesbahi
title Comparison of different computer speeds in calculating of Co 60 depth doses by MCNP4A and MCNP4B Monte Carlo codes
title_short Comparison of different computer speeds in calculating of Co 60 depth doses by MCNP4A and MCNP4B Monte Carlo codes
title_full Comparison of different computer speeds in calculating of Co 60 depth doses by MCNP4A and MCNP4B Monte Carlo codes
title_fullStr Comparison of different computer speeds in calculating of Co 60 depth doses by MCNP4A and MCNP4B Monte Carlo codes
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different computer speeds in calculating of Co 60 depth doses by MCNP4A and MCNP4B Monte Carlo codes
title_sort comparison of different computer speeds in calculating of co 60 depth doses by mcnp4a and mcnp4b monte carlo codes
publisher Babol University of Medical Sciences
publishDate 2004
url https://doaj.org/article/272a19c40c0349859ec3ec33e2cfeb51
work_keys_str_mv AT amesbahi comparisonofdifferentcomputerspeedsincalculatingofco60depthdosesbymcnp4aandmcnp4bmontecarlocodes
AT rmahdavi comparisonofdifferentcomputerspeedsincalculatingofco60depthdosesbymcnp4aandmcnp4bmontecarlocodes
AT mallahverdi comparisonofdifferentcomputerspeedsincalculatingofco60depthdosesbymcnp4aandmcnp4bmontecarlocodes
_version_ 1718440172242075648