Impact of conduction disturbances on left ventricular mass regression and geometry change following transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Abstract Our study aimed to compare the difference of LV mass regression and remodeling in regard of conduction disturbances (CD) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). A prospective analysis of 152 consecutive TAVR patients was performed. 53 patients (34.9%) had CD following TAVR,...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsung-Yu Ko, Hsien-Li Kao, Ying-Ju Liu, Chih-Fan Yeh, Ching-Chang Huang, Ying-Hsien Chen, Chi-Sheng Hung, Chih-Yang Chan, Lung-Chun Lin, Yih-Sharng Chen, Mao-Shin Lin
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2740705fd8a6499d97c10eff0bdf9521
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2740705fd8a6499d97c10eff0bdf9521
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2740705fd8a6499d97c10eff0bdf95212021-12-02T17:08:36ZImpact of conduction disturbances on left ventricular mass regression and geometry change following transcatheter aortic valve replacement10.1038/s41598-021-96297-52045-2322https://doaj.org/article/2740705fd8a6499d97c10eff0bdf95212021-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96297-5https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Our study aimed to compare the difference of LV mass regression and remodeling in regard of conduction disturbances (CD) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). A prospective analysis of 152 consecutive TAVR patients was performed. 53 patients (34.9%) had CD following TAVR, including 30 (19.7%) permanent pacemaker implantation and 23 (15.2%) new left bundle branch block. In 123 patients with 1-year follow-up, significant improvement of LV ejection fraction (LVEF) (baseline vs 12-month: 65.1 ± 13.2 vs 68.7 ± 9.1, P = 0.017) and reduced LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) (39.8 ± 25.8 vs 34.3 ± 17.1, P = 0.011) was found in non-CD group (N = 85), but not in CD group (N = 38). Both groups had significant decrease in LV mass index (baseline vs 12-month: 148.6 ± 36.9 vs. 136.4 ± 34.7 in CD group, p = 0.023; 153.0 ± 50.5 vs. 125.6 ± 35.1 in non-CD group, p < 0.0001). In 46 patients with 3-year follow-up, only non-CD patients (N = 28) had statistically significant decrease in LV mass index (Baseline vs 36-month: 180.8 ± 58.8 vs 129.8 ± 39.1, p = 0.0001). Our study showed the improvement of LV systolic function, reduced LVESV and LV mass regression at 1 year could be observed in patients without CD after TAVR. Sustained LV mass regression within 3-year was found only in patients without CD.Tsung-Yu KoHsien-Li KaoYing-Ju LiuChih-Fan YehChing-Chang HuangYing-Hsien ChenChi-Sheng HungChih-Yang ChanLung-Chun LinYih-Sharng ChenMao-Shin LinNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Tsung-Yu Ko
Hsien-Li Kao
Ying-Ju Liu
Chih-Fan Yeh
Ching-Chang Huang
Ying-Hsien Chen
Chi-Sheng Hung
Chih-Yang Chan
Lung-Chun Lin
Yih-Sharng Chen
Mao-Shin Lin
Impact of conduction disturbances on left ventricular mass regression and geometry change following transcatheter aortic valve replacement
description Abstract Our study aimed to compare the difference of LV mass regression and remodeling in regard of conduction disturbances (CD) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). A prospective analysis of 152 consecutive TAVR patients was performed. 53 patients (34.9%) had CD following TAVR, including 30 (19.7%) permanent pacemaker implantation and 23 (15.2%) new left bundle branch block. In 123 patients with 1-year follow-up, significant improvement of LV ejection fraction (LVEF) (baseline vs 12-month: 65.1 ± 13.2 vs 68.7 ± 9.1, P = 0.017) and reduced LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) (39.8 ± 25.8 vs 34.3 ± 17.1, P = 0.011) was found in non-CD group (N = 85), but not in CD group (N = 38). Both groups had significant decrease in LV mass index (baseline vs 12-month: 148.6 ± 36.9 vs. 136.4 ± 34.7 in CD group, p = 0.023; 153.0 ± 50.5 vs. 125.6 ± 35.1 in non-CD group, p < 0.0001). In 46 patients with 3-year follow-up, only non-CD patients (N = 28) had statistically significant decrease in LV mass index (Baseline vs 36-month: 180.8 ± 58.8 vs 129.8 ± 39.1, p = 0.0001). Our study showed the improvement of LV systolic function, reduced LVESV and LV mass regression at 1 year could be observed in patients without CD after TAVR. Sustained LV mass regression within 3-year was found only in patients without CD.
format article
author Tsung-Yu Ko
Hsien-Li Kao
Ying-Ju Liu
Chih-Fan Yeh
Ching-Chang Huang
Ying-Hsien Chen
Chi-Sheng Hung
Chih-Yang Chan
Lung-Chun Lin
Yih-Sharng Chen
Mao-Shin Lin
author_facet Tsung-Yu Ko
Hsien-Li Kao
Ying-Ju Liu
Chih-Fan Yeh
Ching-Chang Huang
Ying-Hsien Chen
Chi-Sheng Hung
Chih-Yang Chan
Lung-Chun Lin
Yih-Sharng Chen
Mao-Shin Lin
author_sort Tsung-Yu Ko
title Impact of conduction disturbances on left ventricular mass regression and geometry change following transcatheter aortic valve replacement
title_short Impact of conduction disturbances on left ventricular mass regression and geometry change following transcatheter aortic valve replacement
title_full Impact of conduction disturbances on left ventricular mass regression and geometry change following transcatheter aortic valve replacement
title_fullStr Impact of conduction disturbances on left ventricular mass regression and geometry change following transcatheter aortic valve replacement
title_full_unstemmed Impact of conduction disturbances on left ventricular mass regression and geometry change following transcatheter aortic valve replacement
title_sort impact of conduction disturbances on left ventricular mass regression and geometry change following transcatheter aortic valve replacement
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/2740705fd8a6499d97c10eff0bdf9521
work_keys_str_mv AT tsungyuko impactofconductiondisturbancesonleftventricularmassregressionandgeometrychangefollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT hsienlikao impactofconductiondisturbancesonleftventricularmassregressionandgeometrychangefollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT yingjuliu impactofconductiondisturbancesonleftventricularmassregressionandgeometrychangefollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT chihfanyeh impactofconductiondisturbancesonleftventricularmassregressionandgeometrychangefollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT chingchanghuang impactofconductiondisturbancesonleftventricularmassregressionandgeometrychangefollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT yinghsienchen impactofconductiondisturbancesonleftventricularmassregressionandgeometrychangefollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT chishenghung impactofconductiondisturbancesonleftventricularmassregressionandgeometrychangefollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT chihyangchan impactofconductiondisturbancesonleftventricularmassregressionandgeometrychangefollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT lungchunlin impactofconductiondisturbancesonleftventricularmassregressionandgeometrychangefollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT yihsharngchen impactofconductiondisturbancesonleftventricularmassregressionandgeometrychangefollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
AT maoshinlin impactofconductiondisturbancesonleftventricularmassregressionandgeometrychangefollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement
_version_ 1718381543814070272