Impact of conduction disturbances on left ventricular mass regression and geometry change following transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Abstract Our study aimed to compare the difference of LV mass regression and remodeling in regard of conduction disturbances (CD) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). A prospective analysis of 152 consecutive TAVR patients was performed. 53 patients (34.9%) had CD following TAVR,...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/2740705fd8a6499d97c10eff0bdf9521 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:2740705fd8a6499d97c10eff0bdf9521 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:2740705fd8a6499d97c10eff0bdf95212021-12-02T17:08:36ZImpact of conduction disturbances on left ventricular mass regression and geometry change following transcatheter aortic valve replacement10.1038/s41598-021-96297-52045-2322https://doaj.org/article/2740705fd8a6499d97c10eff0bdf95212021-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96297-5https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Our study aimed to compare the difference of LV mass regression and remodeling in regard of conduction disturbances (CD) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). A prospective analysis of 152 consecutive TAVR patients was performed. 53 patients (34.9%) had CD following TAVR, including 30 (19.7%) permanent pacemaker implantation and 23 (15.2%) new left bundle branch block. In 123 patients with 1-year follow-up, significant improvement of LV ejection fraction (LVEF) (baseline vs 12-month: 65.1 ± 13.2 vs 68.7 ± 9.1, P = 0.017) and reduced LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) (39.8 ± 25.8 vs 34.3 ± 17.1, P = 0.011) was found in non-CD group (N = 85), but not in CD group (N = 38). Both groups had significant decrease in LV mass index (baseline vs 12-month: 148.6 ± 36.9 vs. 136.4 ± 34.7 in CD group, p = 0.023; 153.0 ± 50.5 vs. 125.6 ± 35.1 in non-CD group, p < 0.0001). In 46 patients with 3-year follow-up, only non-CD patients (N = 28) had statistically significant decrease in LV mass index (Baseline vs 36-month: 180.8 ± 58.8 vs 129.8 ± 39.1, p = 0.0001). Our study showed the improvement of LV systolic function, reduced LVESV and LV mass regression at 1 year could be observed in patients without CD after TAVR. Sustained LV mass regression within 3-year was found only in patients without CD.Tsung-Yu KoHsien-Li KaoYing-Ju LiuChih-Fan YehChing-Chang HuangYing-Hsien ChenChi-Sheng HungChih-Yang ChanLung-Chun LinYih-Sharng ChenMao-Shin LinNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Tsung-Yu Ko Hsien-Li Kao Ying-Ju Liu Chih-Fan Yeh Ching-Chang Huang Ying-Hsien Chen Chi-Sheng Hung Chih-Yang Chan Lung-Chun Lin Yih-Sharng Chen Mao-Shin Lin Impact of conduction disturbances on left ventricular mass regression and geometry change following transcatheter aortic valve replacement |
description |
Abstract Our study aimed to compare the difference of LV mass regression and remodeling in regard of conduction disturbances (CD) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). A prospective analysis of 152 consecutive TAVR patients was performed. 53 patients (34.9%) had CD following TAVR, including 30 (19.7%) permanent pacemaker implantation and 23 (15.2%) new left bundle branch block. In 123 patients with 1-year follow-up, significant improvement of LV ejection fraction (LVEF) (baseline vs 12-month: 65.1 ± 13.2 vs 68.7 ± 9.1, P = 0.017) and reduced LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) (39.8 ± 25.8 vs 34.3 ± 17.1, P = 0.011) was found in non-CD group (N = 85), but not in CD group (N = 38). Both groups had significant decrease in LV mass index (baseline vs 12-month: 148.6 ± 36.9 vs. 136.4 ± 34.7 in CD group, p = 0.023; 153.0 ± 50.5 vs. 125.6 ± 35.1 in non-CD group, p < 0.0001). In 46 patients with 3-year follow-up, only non-CD patients (N = 28) had statistically significant decrease in LV mass index (Baseline vs 36-month: 180.8 ± 58.8 vs 129.8 ± 39.1, p = 0.0001). Our study showed the improvement of LV systolic function, reduced LVESV and LV mass regression at 1 year could be observed in patients without CD after TAVR. Sustained LV mass regression within 3-year was found only in patients without CD. |
format |
article |
author |
Tsung-Yu Ko Hsien-Li Kao Ying-Ju Liu Chih-Fan Yeh Ching-Chang Huang Ying-Hsien Chen Chi-Sheng Hung Chih-Yang Chan Lung-Chun Lin Yih-Sharng Chen Mao-Shin Lin |
author_facet |
Tsung-Yu Ko Hsien-Li Kao Ying-Ju Liu Chih-Fan Yeh Ching-Chang Huang Ying-Hsien Chen Chi-Sheng Hung Chih-Yang Chan Lung-Chun Lin Yih-Sharng Chen Mao-Shin Lin |
author_sort |
Tsung-Yu Ko |
title |
Impact of conduction disturbances on left ventricular mass regression and geometry change following transcatheter aortic valve replacement |
title_short |
Impact of conduction disturbances on left ventricular mass regression and geometry change following transcatheter aortic valve replacement |
title_full |
Impact of conduction disturbances on left ventricular mass regression and geometry change following transcatheter aortic valve replacement |
title_fullStr |
Impact of conduction disturbances on left ventricular mass regression and geometry change following transcatheter aortic valve replacement |
title_full_unstemmed |
Impact of conduction disturbances on left ventricular mass regression and geometry change following transcatheter aortic valve replacement |
title_sort |
impact of conduction disturbances on left ventricular mass regression and geometry change following transcatheter aortic valve replacement |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/2740705fd8a6499d97c10eff0bdf9521 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tsungyuko impactofconductiondisturbancesonleftventricularmassregressionandgeometrychangefollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT hsienlikao impactofconductiondisturbancesonleftventricularmassregressionandgeometrychangefollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT yingjuliu impactofconductiondisturbancesonleftventricularmassregressionandgeometrychangefollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT chihfanyeh impactofconductiondisturbancesonleftventricularmassregressionandgeometrychangefollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT chingchanghuang impactofconductiondisturbancesonleftventricularmassregressionandgeometrychangefollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT yinghsienchen impactofconductiondisturbancesonleftventricularmassregressionandgeometrychangefollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT chishenghung impactofconductiondisturbancesonleftventricularmassregressionandgeometrychangefollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT chihyangchan impactofconductiondisturbancesonleftventricularmassregressionandgeometrychangefollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT lungchunlin impactofconductiondisturbancesonleftventricularmassregressionandgeometrychangefollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT yihsharngchen impactofconductiondisturbancesonleftventricularmassregressionandgeometrychangefollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT maoshinlin impactofconductiondisturbancesonleftventricularmassregressionandgeometrychangefollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement |
_version_ |
1718381543814070272 |