THE OBJECTIONS OF TAHIR IBN ASHOUR TO GRAMMARIANS IN HIS BOOK AL-TAHRIR WA-AL-TANWIR
One of the most important characteristics of Tahir Ibn Ashour is that he has a special opinion, an independent personality and boldness in the discussion, and strength in the responses to other advanced scholars. His soft responses are often far from harsh or sarcastic. It is not far from acceptable...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | DE EN FR TR |
Publicado: |
Fırat University
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/27643932ef5d458ca2ca176acbe3c95b |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Sumario: | One of the most important characteristics of Tahir Ibn Ashour is that he has a special opinion, an independent personality and boldness in the discussion, and strength in the responses to other advanced scholars. His soft responses are often far from harsh or sarcastic. It is not far from acceptable grammatical or linguistic guidance. From this point of view, the aim of this research was to highlight the status of grammatical objections in it’s book "Al-Tahrir Wa-Al-Tanwir" and to indicate its scientific value. There are many ways to object to grammarians, so we declare their name, sometimes others do not announce the name of those who object to it. Sometimes they are separated by a response and an objection, and sometimes others only mention the weakness of dissenting opinion only. In addition to which he had different terms such as: (illusion, forgetfulness, error, contrast, claim, yield, response, anomalies, rare, etc.). One of the most important results that emerged through the study is that Tahir Ibn Ashour was accurate and has a close look at the analysis of issues. The method he adopted in his objections to the grammarians tends to ease without cost. He was not an imitator in all that he conveys from the grammatical heritage, but he had an independent grammatical personality that emerged through his presentation of the issues and his opposition to a number of imams of grammar. |
---|