Two Ways of Understanding Persons: A Husserlian Distinction

This paper clarifies the distinction that Edmund Husserl makes between two different ways of understanding other persons, their actions and motivations: the experiential or empirical way, on the one hand, and the genuinely or authentically intuitive way, on the other hand. The paper argues that Hus...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Sara Heinämaa
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN FR IT
Publicado:	Rosenberg & Sellier 2019
Materias:	understanding others empirical intuitive possibilities Aesthetics BH1-301 Ethics BJ1-1725
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/2768d4396dd849e692f4d9d07b0a5b6e
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:2768d4396dd849e692f4d9d07b0a5b6e
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:2768d4396dd849e692f4d9d07b0a5b6e2021-12-02T13:03:13ZTwo Ways of Understanding Persons: A Husserlian Distinction10.13128/Phe_Mi-249742280-78532239-4028https://doaj.org/article/2768d4396dd849e692f4d9d07b0a5b6e2019-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/pam/article/view/7325https://doaj.org/toc/2280-7853https://doaj.org/toc/2239-4028 This paper clarifies the distinction that Edmund Husserl makes between two different ways of understanding other persons, their actions and motivations: the experiential or empirical way, on the one hand, and the genuinely or authentically intuitive way, on the other hand. The paper argues that Husserl’s discussion of self-understanding clarifies his concept of the intuitive understanding of others and allows us to explicate what is involved in it: not just the grasping of the other’s actual motivations of action but also the grasping of her motivational possibilities. The paper ends by discussing the dynamic character of the personal subject. Sara HeinämaaRosenberg & Sellierarticleunderstanding othersempiricalintuitivepossibilitiesAestheticsBH1-301EthicsBJ1-1725ENFRITPhenomenology and Mind, Iss 15 (2019)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN FR IT
topic	understanding others empirical intuitive possibilities Aesthetics BH1-301 Ethics BJ1-1725
spellingShingle	understanding others empirical intuitive possibilities Aesthetics BH1-301 Ethics BJ1-1725 Sara Heinämaa Two Ways of Understanding Persons: A Husserlian Distinction
description	This paper clarifies the distinction that Edmund Husserl makes between two different ways of understanding other persons, their actions and motivations: the experiential or empirical way, on the one hand, and the genuinely or authentically intuitive way, on the other hand. The paper argues that Husserl’s discussion of self-understanding clarifies his concept of the intuitive understanding of others and allows us to explicate what is involved in it: not just the grasping of the other’s actual motivations of action but also the grasping of her motivational possibilities. The paper ends by discussing the dynamic character of the personal subject.
format	article
author	Sara Heinämaa
author_facet	Sara Heinämaa
author_sort	Sara Heinämaa
title	Two Ways of Understanding Persons: A Husserlian Distinction
title_short	Two Ways of Understanding Persons: A Husserlian Distinction
title_full	Two Ways of Understanding Persons: A Husserlian Distinction
title_fullStr	Two Ways of Understanding Persons: A Husserlian Distinction
title_full_unstemmed	Two Ways of Understanding Persons: A Husserlian Distinction
title_sort	two ways of understanding persons: a husserlian distinction
publisher	Rosenberg & Sellier
publishDate	2019
url	https://doaj.org/article/2768d4396dd849e692f4d9d07b0a5b6e
work_keys_str_mv	AT saraheinamaa twowaysofunderstandingpersonsahusserliandistinction
_version_	1718393494586785792

Two Ways of Understanding Persons: A Husserlian Distinction

Ejemplares similares