The results of intragastric рH-monitoring related to stress ulcer prophylaxis method in comatose patients

Aim. Analyzing dynamics of intragastric рН related to stress ulcer prophylaxis method in comatose patients.  Materials and Methods. The prospective study included 100 comatose patients with brain stroke with consciousness level of 5-8 by Glasgow Coma Scale. All patients were given tube enteral nu...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: U.A. Fesenko, K.M. Loboyko
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
UK
Publicado: Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2769edc39c704172b27ce57a687760a1
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2769edc39c704172b27ce57a687760a1
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2769edc39c704172b27ce57a687760a12021-11-10T19:50:05ZThe results of intragastric рH-monitoring related to stress ulcer prophylaxis method in comatose patients1029-42442415-3303https://doaj.org/article/2769edc39c704172b27ce57a687760a12016-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://amljournal.com/index.php/journal/article/view/173https://doaj.org/toc/1029-4244https://doaj.org/toc/2415-3303Aim. Analyzing dynamics of intragastric рН related to stress ulcer prophylaxis method in comatose patients.  Materials and Methods. The prospective study included 100 comatose patients with brain stroke with consciousness level of 5-8 by Glasgow Coma Scale. All patients were given tube enteral nutrition . The patients were divided into three groups: group HB (n=18) received Н-2-histamine blocker agent; group IPI (n=38) received ion pump inhibitor, and group EN (n=44) received no medication  for stress ulcer prophylaxis. The maximal, minimal and average daily intragastric рН levels were analyzed on the 1st, 3rd, and 5th  days of stay in the intensive care unit.  Results and Discussion. The average daily intragastric pH level in group HB was 2,4±0,44 on day 1,- 4,54±1,5 on day 3, and- 3,85±0,77 on day 5. This parameter in the group IPI was 1,66±0,45 on day 1, 5,9±1,43 on day 3, and 5,37±1,44 on day 5; in the group EN: 2,98±0,65 on day 1,- 3,41±0,45 on day 3, and 3,45±0,5 on day 5.  Conclusions. Early enteral nutrition ensures the optimal level of intragastric pH. The ion pump inhibitors provide more potent inhibition of acidity of gastric content compared to the Н-2-histamine blocker agents. Intragastric рН-monitoring is useful in evaluating the stress ulcer prophylaxis effectiveness in comatose patients.U.A. FesenkoK.M. LoboykoDanylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical Universityarticlestress ulcer prophylaxis, intragastric рн, coma, brain strokeMedicine (General)R5-920ENUKActa Medica Leopoliensia, Vol 22, Iss 4, Pp 27-31 (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
UK
topic stress ulcer prophylaxis, intragastric рн, coma, brain stroke
Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle stress ulcer prophylaxis, intragastric рн, coma, brain stroke
Medicine (General)
R5-920
U.A. Fesenko
K.M. Loboyko
The results of intragastric рH-monitoring related to stress ulcer prophylaxis method in comatose patients
description Aim. Analyzing dynamics of intragastric рН related to stress ulcer prophylaxis method in comatose patients.  Materials and Methods. The prospective study included 100 comatose patients with brain stroke with consciousness level of 5-8 by Glasgow Coma Scale. All patients were given tube enteral nutrition . The patients were divided into three groups: group HB (n=18) received Н-2-histamine blocker agent; group IPI (n=38) received ion pump inhibitor, and group EN (n=44) received no medication  for stress ulcer prophylaxis. The maximal, minimal and average daily intragastric рН levels were analyzed on the 1st, 3rd, and 5th  days of stay in the intensive care unit.  Results and Discussion. The average daily intragastric pH level in group HB was 2,4±0,44 on day 1,- 4,54±1,5 on day 3, and- 3,85±0,77 on day 5. This parameter in the group IPI was 1,66±0,45 on day 1, 5,9±1,43 on day 3, and 5,37±1,44 on day 5; in the group EN: 2,98±0,65 on day 1,- 3,41±0,45 on day 3, and 3,45±0,5 on day 5.  Conclusions. Early enteral nutrition ensures the optimal level of intragastric pH. The ion pump inhibitors provide more potent inhibition of acidity of gastric content compared to the Н-2-histamine blocker agents. Intragastric рН-monitoring is useful in evaluating the stress ulcer prophylaxis effectiveness in comatose patients.
format article
author U.A. Fesenko
K.M. Loboyko
author_facet U.A. Fesenko
K.M. Loboyko
author_sort U.A. Fesenko
title The results of intragastric рH-monitoring related to stress ulcer prophylaxis method in comatose patients
title_short The results of intragastric рH-monitoring related to stress ulcer prophylaxis method in comatose patients
title_full The results of intragastric рH-monitoring related to stress ulcer prophylaxis method in comatose patients
title_fullStr The results of intragastric рH-monitoring related to stress ulcer prophylaxis method in comatose patients
title_full_unstemmed The results of intragastric рH-monitoring related to stress ulcer prophylaxis method in comatose patients
title_sort results of intragastric рh-monitoring related to stress ulcer prophylaxis method in comatose patients
publisher Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/2769edc39c704172b27ce57a687760a1
work_keys_str_mv AT uafesenko theresultsofintragastricrhmonitoringrelatedtostressulcerprophylaxismethodincomatosepatients
AT kmloboyko theresultsofintragastricrhmonitoringrelatedtostressulcerprophylaxismethodincomatosepatients
AT uafesenko resultsofintragastricrhmonitoringrelatedtostressulcerprophylaxismethodincomatosepatients
AT kmloboyko resultsofintragastricrhmonitoringrelatedtostressulcerprophylaxismethodincomatosepatients
_version_ 1718439654584221696