REVIEW: Truly critical and honest appraisals of The Guardian’s record as a guardian of power still needed

Capitalism’s Conscience: 200 Years of the Guardian, edited by Des Freedman. London: Pluto Press. 2021, 320 pages. ISBN 9780745343341; 9780745343358 A collection of essays, Capitalism’s Conscience—200 Years of the Guardian, has been recently published. Edited by Des Freedman, professor of media a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: David Edwards
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Asia Pacific Network 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/27950e50a5e344e784b53321768c840d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:27950e50a5e344e784b53321768c840d
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:27950e50a5e344e784b53321768c840d2021-12-02T18:53:57ZREVIEW: Truly critical and honest appraisals of The Guardian’s record as a guardian of power still needed10.24135/pjr.v27i1&2.11751023-94992324-2035https://doaj.org/article/27950e50a5e344e784b53321768c840d2021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/1175https://doaj.org/toc/1023-9499https://doaj.org/toc/2324-2035 Capitalism’s Conscience: 200 Years of the Guardian, edited by Des Freedman. London: Pluto Press. 2021, 320 pages. ISBN 9780745343341; 9780745343358 A collection of essays, Capitalism’s Conscience—200 Years of the Guardian, has been recently published. Edited by Des Freedman, professor of media and communications at Goldsmiths, University of London, the volume notes that Guardian editor Kath Viner promised that her newspaper would ‘challenge the economic assumptions of the last three decades’, ‘challenge the powerful’ and ‘use clarity and imagination to build hope’. Freedman says the book ‘seeks to examine these claims’ (Freedman, 2021, x). The collection of essays, mostly contributed by media academics, is published by Pluto Press, which has published all three Media Lens books; most recently, Propaganda Blitz, in 2018. Several good reasons for not criticising a book published by one’s own publisher can be found in Tolstoy’s list, but the academic filtering of truth is a key issue that cries out for honest discussion. This essay by three prominent journalists critiques Capitalism’s Conscience and concludes there is a pressing need for truly critical and honest appraisals of The Guardian’s record as a guardian of power   David EdwardsAsia Pacific Networkarticleclimate changeliberalismneoliberalismnewspaperspowerpropagandaCommunication. Mass mediaP87-96Journalism. The periodical press, etc.PN4699-5650ENPacific Journalism Review, Vol 27, Iss 1&2 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic climate change
liberalism
neoliberalism
newspapers
power
propaganda
Communication. Mass media
P87-96
Journalism. The periodical press, etc.
PN4699-5650
spellingShingle climate change
liberalism
neoliberalism
newspapers
power
propaganda
Communication. Mass media
P87-96
Journalism. The periodical press, etc.
PN4699-5650
David Edwards
REVIEW: Truly critical and honest appraisals of The Guardian’s record as a guardian of power still needed
description Capitalism’s Conscience: 200 Years of the Guardian, edited by Des Freedman. London: Pluto Press. 2021, 320 pages. ISBN 9780745343341; 9780745343358 A collection of essays, Capitalism’s Conscience—200 Years of the Guardian, has been recently published. Edited by Des Freedman, professor of media and communications at Goldsmiths, University of London, the volume notes that Guardian editor Kath Viner promised that her newspaper would ‘challenge the economic assumptions of the last three decades’, ‘challenge the powerful’ and ‘use clarity and imagination to build hope’. Freedman says the book ‘seeks to examine these claims’ (Freedman, 2021, x). The collection of essays, mostly contributed by media academics, is published by Pluto Press, which has published all three Media Lens books; most recently, Propaganda Blitz, in 2018. Several good reasons for not criticising a book published by one’s own publisher can be found in Tolstoy’s list, but the academic filtering of truth is a key issue that cries out for honest discussion. This essay by three prominent journalists critiques Capitalism’s Conscience and concludes there is a pressing need for truly critical and honest appraisals of The Guardian’s record as a guardian of power  
format article
author David Edwards
author_facet David Edwards
author_sort David Edwards
title REVIEW: Truly critical and honest appraisals of The Guardian’s record as a guardian of power still needed
title_short REVIEW: Truly critical and honest appraisals of The Guardian’s record as a guardian of power still needed
title_full REVIEW: Truly critical and honest appraisals of The Guardian’s record as a guardian of power still needed
title_fullStr REVIEW: Truly critical and honest appraisals of The Guardian’s record as a guardian of power still needed
title_full_unstemmed REVIEW: Truly critical and honest appraisals of The Guardian’s record as a guardian of power still needed
title_sort review: truly critical and honest appraisals of the guardian’s record as a guardian of power still needed
publisher Asia Pacific Network
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/27950e50a5e344e784b53321768c840d
work_keys_str_mv AT davidedwards reviewtrulycriticalandhonestappraisalsoftheguardiansrecordasaguardianofpowerstillneeded
_version_ 1718377316465246208