REVIEW: Truly critical and honest appraisals of The Guardian’s record as a guardian of power still needed
Capitalism’s Conscience: 200 Years of the Guardian, edited by Des Freedman. London: Pluto Press. 2021, 320 pages. ISBN 9780745343341; 9780745343358 A collection of essays, Capitalism’s Conscience—200 Years of the Guardian, has been recently published. Edited by Des Freedman, professor of media a...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Asia Pacific Network
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/27950e50a5e344e784b53321768c840d |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:27950e50a5e344e784b53321768c840d |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:27950e50a5e344e784b53321768c840d2021-12-02T18:53:57ZREVIEW: Truly critical and honest appraisals of The Guardian’s record as a guardian of power still needed10.24135/pjr.v27i1&2.11751023-94992324-2035https://doaj.org/article/27950e50a5e344e784b53321768c840d2021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/1175https://doaj.org/toc/1023-9499https://doaj.org/toc/2324-2035 Capitalism’s Conscience: 200 Years of the Guardian, edited by Des Freedman. London: Pluto Press. 2021, 320 pages. ISBN 9780745343341; 9780745343358 A collection of essays, Capitalism’s Conscience—200 Years of the Guardian, has been recently published. Edited by Des Freedman, professor of media and communications at Goldsmiths, University of London, the volume notes that Guardian editor Kath Viner promised that her newspaper would ‘challenge the economic assumptions of the last three decades’, ‘challenge the powerful’ and ‘use clarity and imagination to build hope’. Freedman says the book ‘seeks to examine these claims’ (Freedman, 2021, x). The collection of essays, mostly contributed by media academics, is published by Pluto Press, which has published all three Media Lens books; most recently, Propaganda Blitz, in 2018. Several good reasons for not criticising a book published by one’s own publisher can be found in Tolstoy’s list, but the academic filtering of truth is a key issue that cries out for honest discussion. This essay by three prominent journalists critiques Capitalism’s Conscience and concludes there is a pressing need for truly critical and honest appraisals of The Guardian’s record as a guardian of power David EdwardsAsia Pacific Networkarticleclimate changeliberalismneoliberalismnewspaperspowerpropagandaCommunication. Mass mediaP87-96Journalism. The periodical press, etc.PN4699-5650ENPacific Journalism Review, Vol 27, Iss 1&2 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
climate change liberalism neoliberalism newspapers power propaganda Communication. Mass media P87-96 Journalism. The periodical press, etc. PN4699-5650 |
spellingShingle |
climate change liberalism neoliberalism newspapers power propaganda Communication. Mass media P87-96 Journalism. The periodical press, etc. PN4699-5650 David Edwards REVIEW: Truly critical and honest appraisals of The Guardian’s record as a guardian of power still needed |
description |
Capitalism’s Conscience: 200 Years of the Guardian, edited by Des Freedman. London: Pluto Press. 2021, 320 pages. ISBN 9780745343341; 9780745343358
A collection of essays, Capitalism’s Conscience—200 Years of the Guardian, has been recently published. Edited by Des Freedman, professor of media and communications at Goldsmiths, University of London, the volume notes that Guardian editor Kath Viner promised that her newspaper would ‘challenge the economic assumptions of the last three decades’, ‘challenge the powerful’ and ‘use clarity and imagination to build hope’. Freedman says the book ‘seeks to examine these claims’ (Freedman, 2021, x). The collection of essays, mostly contributed by media academics, is published by Pluto Press, which has published all three Media Lens books; most recently, Propaganda Blitz, in 2018. Several good reasons for not criticising a book published by one’s own publisher can be found in Tolstoy’s list, but the academic filtering of truth is a key issue that cries out for honest discussion. This essay by three prominent journalists critiques Capitalism’s Conscience and concludes there is a pressing need for truly critical and honest appraisals of The Guardian’s record as a guardian of power
|
format |
article |
author |
David Edwards |
author_facet |
David Edwards |
author_sort |
David Edwards |
title |
REVIEW: Truly critical and honest appraisals of The Guardian’s record as a guardian of power still needed |
title_short |
REVIEW: Truly critical and honest appraisals of The Guardian’s record as a guardian of power still needed |
title_full |
REVIEW: Truly critical and honest appraisals of The Guardian’s record as a guardian of power still needed |
title_fullStr |
REVIEW: Truly critical and honest appraisals of The Guardian’s record as a guardian of power still needed |
title_full_unstemmed |
REVIEW: Truly critical and honest appraisals of The Guardian’s record as a guardian of power still needed |
title_sort |
review: truly critical and honest appraisals of the guardian’s record as a guardian of power still needed |
publisher |
Asia Pacific Network |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/27950e50a5e344e784b53321768c840d |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT davidedwards reviewtrulycriticalandhonestappraisalsoftheguardiansrecordasaguardianofpowerstillneeded |
_version_ |
1718377316465246208 |