Impact of risk factors on different interval cancer subtypes in a population-based breast cancer screening programme.

<h4>Background</h4>Interval cancers are primary breast cancers diagnosed in women after a negative screening test and before the next screening invitation. Our aim was to evaluate risk factors for interval cancer and their subtypes and to compare the risk factors identified with those as...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jordi Blanch, Maria Sala, Josefa Ibáñez, Laia Domingo, Belén Fernandez, Arantza Otegi, Teresa Barata, Raquel Zubizarreta, Joana Ferrer, Xavier Castells, Montserrat Rué, Dolores Salas, INCA Study Group
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/27b16eca5fad4e2386747d8678620049
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:27b16eca5fad4e2386747d8678620049
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:27b16eca5fad4e2386747d86786200492021-11-25T05:55:42ZImpact of risk factors on different interval cancer subtypes in a population-based breast cancer screening programme.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0110207https://doaj.org/article/27b16eca5fad4e2386747d86786200492014-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110207https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>Interval cancers are primary breast cancers diagnosed in women after a negative screening test and before the next screening invitation. Our aim was to evaluate risk factors for interval cancer and their subtypes and to compare the risk factors identified with those associated with incident screen-detected cancers.<h4>Methods</h4>We analyzed data from 645,764 women participating in the Spanish breast cancer screening program from 2000-2006 and followed-up until 2009. A total of 5,309 screen-detected and 1,653 interval cancers were diagnosed. Among the latter, 1,012 could be classified on the basis of findings in screening and diagnostic mammograms, consisting of 489 true interval cancers (48.2%), 235 false-negatives (23.2%), 172 minimal-signs (17.2%) and 114 occult tumors (11.3%). Information on the screening protocol and women's characteristics were obtained from the screening program registry. Cause-specific Cox regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HR) of risks factors for interval cancer and incident screen-detected cancer. A multinomial regression model, using screen-detected tumors as a reference group, was used to assess the effect of breast density and other factors on the occurrence of interval cancer subtypes.<h4>Results</h4>A previous false-positive was the main risk factor for interval cancer (HR = 2.71, 95%CI: 2.28-3.23); this risk was higher for false-negatives (HR = 8.79, 95%CI: 6.24-12.40) than for true interval cancer (HR = 2.26, 95%CI: 1.59-3.21). A family history of breast cancer was associated with true intervals (HR = 2.11, 95%CI: 1.60-2.78), previous benign biopsy with a false-negatives (HR = 1.83, 95%CI: 1.23-2.71). High breast density was mainly associated with occult tumors (RRR = 4.92, 95%CI: 2.58-9.38), followed by true intervals (RRR = 1.67, 95%CI: 1.18-2.36) and false-negatives (RRR = 1.58, 95%CI: 1.00-2.49).<h4>Conclusion</h4>The role of women's characteristics differs among interval cancer subtypes. This information could be useful to improve effectiveness of breast cancer screening programmes and to better classify subgroups of women with different risks of developing cancer.Jordi BlanchMaria SalaJosefa IbáñezLaia DomingoBelén FernandezArantza OtegiTeresa BarataRaquel ZubizarretaJoana FerrerXavier CastellsMontserrat RuéDolores SalasINCA Study GroupPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 10, p e110207 (2014)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Jordi Blanch
Maria Sala
Josefa Ibáñez
Laia Domingo
Belén Fernandez
Arantza Otegi
Teresa Barata
Raquel Zubizarreta
Joana Ferrer
Xavier Castells
Montserrat Rué
Dolores Salas
INCA Study Group
Impact of risk factors on different interval cancer subtypes in a population-based breast cancer screening programme.
description <h4>Background</h4>Interval cancers are primary breast cancers diagnosed in women after a negative screening test and before the next screening invitation. Our aim was to evaluate risk factors for interval cancer and their subtypes and to compare the risk factors identified with those associated with incident screen-detected cancers.<h4>Methods</h4>We analyzed data from 645,764 women participating in the Spanish breast cancer screening program from 2000-2006 and followed-up until 2009. A total of 5,309 screen-detected and 1,653 interval cancers were diagnosed. Among the latter, 1,012 could be classified on the basis of findings in screening and diagnostic mammograms, consisting of 489 true interval cancers (48.2%), 235 false-negatives (23.2%), 172 minimal-signs (17.2%) and 114 occult tumors (11.3%). Information on the screening protocol and women's characteristics were obtained from the screening program registry. Cause-specific Cox regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HR) of risks factors for interval cancer and incident screen-detected cancer. A multinomial regression model, using screen-detected tumors as a reference group, was used to assess the effect of breast density and other factors on the occurrence of interval cancer subtypes.<h4>Results</h4>A previous false-positive was the main risk factor for interval cancer (HR = 2.71, 95%CI: 2.28-3.23); this risk was higher for false-negatives (HR = 8.79, 95%CI: 6.24-12.40) than for true interval cancer (HR = 2.26, 95%CI: 1.59-3.21). A family history of breast cancer was associated with true intervals (HR = 2.11, 95%CI: 1.60-2.78), previous benign biopsy with a false-negatives (HR = 1.83, 95%CI: 1.23-2.71). High breast density was mainly associated with occult tumors (RRR = 4.92, 95%CI: 2.58-9.38), followed by true intervals (RRR = 1.67, 95%CI: 1.18-2.36) and false-negatives (RRR = 1.58, 95%CI: 1.00-2.49).<h4>Conclusion</h4>The role of women's characteristics differs among interval cancer subtypes. This information could be useful to improve effectiveness of breast cancer screening programmes and to better classify subgroups of women with different risks of developing cancer.
format article
author Jordi Blanch
Maria Sala
Josefa Ibáñez
Laia Domingo
Belén Fernandez
Arantza Otegi
Teresa Barata
Raquel Zubizarreta
Joana Ferrer
Xavier Castells
Montserrat Rué
Dolores Salas
INCA Study Group
author_facet Jordi Blanch
Maria Sala
Josefa Ibáñez
Laia Domingo
Belén Fernandez
Arantza Otegi
Teresa Barata
Raquel Zubizarreta
Joana Ferrer
Xavier Castells
Montserrat Rué
Dolores Salas
INCA Study Group
author_sort Jordi Blanch
title Impact of risk factors on different interval cancer subtypes in a population-based breast cancer screening programme.
title_short Impact of risk factors on different interval cancer subtypes in a population-based breast cancer screening programme.
title_full Impact of risk factors on different interval cancer subtypes in a population-based breast cancer screening programme.
title_fullStr Impact of risk factors on different interval cancer subtypes in a population-based breast cancer screening programme.
title_full_unstemmed Impact of risk factors on different interval cancer subtypes in a population-based breast cancer screening programme.
title_sort impact of risk factors on different interval cancer subtypes in a population-based breast cancer screening programme.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2014
url https://doaj.org/article/27b16eca5fad4e2386747d8678620049
work_keys_str_mv AT jordiblanch impactofriskfactorsondifferentintervalcancersubtypesinapopulationbasedbreastcancerscreeningprogramme
AT mariasala impactofriskfactorsondifferentintervalcancersubtypesinapopulationbasedbreastcancerscreeningprogramme
AT josefaibanez impactofriskfactorsondifferentintervalcancersubtypesinapopulationbasedbreastcancerscreeningprogramme
AT laiadomingo impactofriskfactorsondifferentintervalcancersubtypesinapopulationbasedbreastcancerscreeningprogramme
AT belenfernandez impactofriskfactorsondifferentintervalcancersubtypesinapopulationbasedbreastcancerscreeningprogramme
AT arantzaotegi impactofriskfactorsondifferentintervalcancersubtypesinapopulationbasedbreastcancerscreeningprogramme
AT teresabarata impactofriskfactorsondifferentintervalcancersubtypesinapopulationbasedbreastcancerscreeningprogramme
AT raquelzubizarreta impactofriskfactorsondifferentintervalcancersubtypesinapopulationbasedbreastcancerscreeningprogramme
AT joanaferrer impactofriskfactorsondifferentintervalcancersubtypesinapopulationbasedbreastcancerscreeningprogramme
AT xaviercastells impactofriskfactorsondifferentintervalcancersubtypesinapopulationbasedbreastcancerscreeningprogramme
AT montserratrue impactofriskfactorsondifferentintervalcancersubtypesinapopulationbasedbreastcancerscreeningprogramme
AT doloressalas impactofriskfactorsondifferentintervalcancersubtypesinapopulationbasedbreastcancerscreeningprogramme
AT incastudygroup impactofriskfactorsondifferentintervalcancersubtypesinapopulationbasedbreastcancerscreeningprogramme
_version_ 1718414327629742080