Conscious Intentionality in Perception, Imagination, and Cognition

Participants in the cognitive phenomenology debate have proceeded by (a) proposing a bifurcation of theoretical options into inflationary and non-inflationary theories, and then (b) providing arguments for/against one of these theories. I suggest that this method has failed to illuminate the common...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Philip Woodward
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
FR
IT
Publicado: Rosenberg & Sellier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/27da92fb834344aa98b4c77e1d43f06b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:27da92fb834344aa98b4c77e1d43f06b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:27da92fb834344aa98b4c77e1d43f06b2021-12-02T12:01:57ZConscious Intentionality in Perception, Imagination, and Cognition10.13128/Phe_Mi-200972280-78532239-4028https://doaj.org/article/27da92fb834344aa98b4c77e1d43f06b2017-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/pam/article/view/7234https://doaj.org/toc/2280-7853https://doaj.org/toc/2239-4028 Participants in the cognitive phenomenology debate have proceeded by (a) proposing a bifurcation of theoretical options into inflationary and non-inflationary theories, and then (b) providing arguments for/against one of these theories. I suggest that this method has failed to illuminate the commonalities and differences among conscious intentional states of different types, in the absence of a theory of the structure of these states. I propose such a theory. In perception, phenomenal-intentional properties combine with somatosensory properties to form P-I property clusters that serve as phenomenal modes of presentations of particulars. In imagination, somatosensory properties are replaced with phenomenal-intentional properties whose intentional objects are somatosensory properties, thus resulting in imaginative facsimiles of perceptual P-I property clusters. Such structures can then be used as phenomenal prototypes that pick out individuals and kinds. Sets of such prototypes constitute a subject’s conception of individuals and kinds. Combined with a few additional elements, these imaginative P-I property clusters serve as the building-blocks of conscious cognitive states. Different ways of carving up theoretical space classify my theory either as inflationary or as non-inflationary. I conclude that the theory is anti-inflationary in letter but inflationary in spirit. Philip WoodwardRosenberg & Sellierarticlecognitive phenomenologyphenomenal intentionalityperceptionimaginationAestheticsBH1-301EthicsBJ1-1725ENFRITPhenomenology and Mind, Iss 10 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
FR
IT
topic cognitive phenomenology
phenomenal intentionality
perception
imagination
Aesthetics
BH1-301
Ethics
BJ1-1725
spellingShingle cognitive phenomenology
phenomenal intentionality
perception
imagination
Aesthetics
BH1-301
Ethics
BJ1-1725
Philip Woodward
Conscious Intentionality in Perception, Imagination, and Cognition
description Participants in the cognitive phenomenology debate have proceeded by (a) proposing a bifurcation of theoretical options into inflationary and non-inflationary theories, and then (b) providing arguments for/against one of these theories. I suggest that this method has failed to illuminate the commonalities and differences among conscious intentional states of different types, in the absence of a theory of the structure of these states. I propose such a theory. In perception, phenomenal-intentional properties combine with somatosensory properties to form P-I property clusters that serve as phenomenal modes of presentations of particulars. In imagination, somatosensory properties are replaced with phenomenal-intentional properties whose intentional objects are somatosensory properties, thus resulting in imaginative facsimiles of perceptual P-I property clusters. Such structures can then be used as phenomenal prototypes that pick out individuals and kinds. Sets of such prototypes constitute a subject’s conception of individuals and kinds. Combined with a few additional elements, these imaginative P-I property clusters serve as the building-blocks of conscious cognitive states. Different ways of carving up theoretical space classify my theory either as inflationary or as non-inflationary. I conclude that the theory is anti-inflationary in letter but inflationary in spirit.
format article
author Philip Woodward
author_facet Philip Woodward
author_sort Philip Woodward
title Conscious Intentionality in Perception, Imagination, and Cognition
title_short Conscious Intentionality in Perception, Imagination, and Cognition
title_full Conscious Intentionality in Perception, Imagination, and Cognition
title_fullStr Conscious Intentionality in Perception, Imagination, and Cognition
title_full_unstemmed Conscious Intentionality in Perception, Imagination, and Cognition
title_sort conscious intentionality in perception, imagination, and cognition
publisher Rosenberg & Sellier
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/27da92fb834344aa98b4c77e1d43f06b
work_keys_str_mv AT philipwoodward consciousintentionalityinperceptionimaginationandcognition
_version_ 1718394737825677312