Conscious Intentionality in Perception, Imagination, and Cognition
Participants in the cognitive phenomenology debate have proceeded by (a) proposing a bifurcation of theoretical options into inflationary and non-inflationary theories, and then (b) providing arguments for/against one of these theories. I suggest that this method has failed to illuminate the common...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN FR IT |
Publicado: |
Rosenberg & Sellier
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/27da92fb834344aa98b4c77e1d43f06b |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:27da92fb834344aa98b4c77e1d43f06b |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:27da92fb834344aa98b4c77e1d43f06b2021-12-02T12:01:57ZConscious Intentionality in Perception, Imagination, and Cognition10.13128/Phe_Mi-200972280-78532239-4028https://doaj.org/article/27da92fb834344aa98b4c77e1d43f06b2017-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/pam/article/view/7234https://doaj.org/toc/2280-7853https://doaj.org/toc/2239-4028 Participants in the cognitive phenomenology debate have proceeded by (a) proposing a bifurcation of theoretical options into inflationary and non-inflationary theories, and then (b) providing arguments for/against one of these theories. I suggest that this method has failed to illuminate the commonalities and differences among conscious intentional states of different types, in the absence of a theory of the structure of these states. I propose such a theory. In perception, phenomenal-intentional properties combine with somatosensory properties to form P-I property clusters that serve as phenomenal modes of presentations of particulars. In imagination, somatosensory properties are replaced with phenomenal-intentional properties whose intentional objects are somatosensory properties, thus resulting in imaginative facsimiles of perceptual P-I property clusters. Such structures can then be used as phenomenal prototypes that pick out individuals and kinds. Sets of such prototypes constitute a subject’s conception of individuals and kinds. Combined with a few additional elements, these imaginative P-I property clusters serve as the building-blocks of conscious cognitive states. Different ways of carving up theoretical space classify my theory either as inflationary or as non-inflationary. I conclude that the theory is anti-inflationary in letter but inflationary in spirit. Philip WoodwardRosenberg & Sellierarticlecognitive phenomenologyphenomenal intentionalityperceptionimaginationAestheticsBH1-301EthicsBJ1-1725ENFRITPhenomenology and Mind, Iss 10 (2017) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN FR IT |
topic |
cognitive phenomenology phenomenal intentionality perception imagination Aesthetics BH1-301 Ethics BJ1-1725 |
spellingShingle |
cognitive phenomenology phenomenal intentionality perception imagination Aesthetics BH1-301 Ethics BJ1-1725 Philip Woodward Conscious Intentionality in Perception, Imagination, and Cognition |
description |
Participants in the cognitive phenomenology debate have proceeded by (a) proposing a bifurcation of theoretical options into inflationary and non-inflationary theories, and then (b) providing arguments for/against one of these theories. I suggest that this method has failed to illuminate the commonalities and differences among conscious intentional states of different types, in the absence of a theory of the structure of these states. I propose such a theory. In perception, phenomenal-intentional properties combine with somatosensory properties to form P-I property clusters that serve as phenomenal modes of presentations of particulars. In imagination, somatosensory properties are replaced with phenomenal-intentional properties whose intentional objects are somatosensory properties, thus resulting in imaginative facsimiles of perceptual P-I property clusters. Such structures can then be used as phenomenal prototypes that pick out individuals and kinds. Sets of such prototypes constitute a subject’s conception of individuals and kinds. Combined with a few additional elements, these imaginative P-I property clusters serve as the building-blocks of conscious cognitive states. Different ways of carving up theoretical space classify my theory either as inflationary or as non-inflationary. I conclude that the theory is anti-inflationary in letter but inflationary in spirit.
|
format |
article |
author |
Philip Woodward |
author_facet |
Philip Woodward |
author_sort |
Philip Woodward |
title |
Conscious Intentionality in Perception, Imagination, and Cognition |
title_short |
Conscious Intentionality in Perception, Imagination, and Cognition |
title_full |
Conscious Intentionality in Perception, Imagination, and Cognition |
title_fullStr |
Conscious Intentionality in Perception, Imagination, and Cognition |
title_full_unstemmed |
Conscious Intentionality in Perception, Imagination, and Cognition |
title_sort |
conscious intentionality in perception, imagination, and cognition |
publisher |
Rosenberg & Sellier |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/27da92fb834344aa98b4c77e1d43f06b |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT philipwoodward consciousintentionalityinperceptionimaginationandcognition |
_version_ |
1718394737825677312 |