Parity predicts biological age acceleration in post-menopausal, but not pre-menopausal, women

Abstract Understanding factors contributing to variation in ‘biological age’ is essential to understanding variation in susceptibility to disease and functional decline. One factor that could accelerate biological aging in women is reproduction. Pregnancy is characterized by extensive, energetically...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Talia N. Shirazi, Waylon J. Hastings, Asher Y. Rosinger, Calen P. Ryan
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2020
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/27e4ba3472bb491a91e560cf05395dc0
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:27e4ba3472bb491a91e560cf05395dc0
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:27e4ba3472bb491a91e560cf05395dc02021-12-02T16:09:10ZParity predicts biological age acceleration in post-menopausal, but not pre-menopausal, women10.1038/s41598-020-77082-22045-2322https://doaj.org/article/27e4ba3472bb491a91e560cf05395dc02020-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77082-2https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Understanding factors contributing to variation in ‘biological age’ is essential to understanding variation in susceptibility to disease and functional decline. One factor that could accelerate biological aging in women is reproduction. Pregnancy is characterized by extensive, energetically-costly changes across numerous physiological systems. These ‘costs of reproduction’ may accumulate with each pregnancy, accelerating biological aging. Despite evidence for costs of reproduction using molecular and demographic measures, it is unknown whether parity is linked to commonly-used clinical measures of biological aging. We use data collected between 1999 and 2010 from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (n = 4418) to test whether parity (number of live births) predicted four previously-validated composite measures of biological age and system integrity: Levine Method, homeostatic dysregulation, Klemera–Doubal method biological age, and allostatic load. Parity exhibited a U-shaped relationship with accelerated biological aging when controlling for chronological age, lifestyle, health-related, and demographic factors in post-menopausal, but not pre-menopausal, women, with biological age acceleration being lowest among post-menopausal women reporting between three and four live births. Our findings suggest a link between reproductive function and physiological dysregulation, and allude to possible compensatory mechanisms that buffer the effects of reproductive function on physiological dysregulation during a woman’s reproductive lifespan. Future work should continue to investigate links between parity, menopausal status, and biological age using targeted physiological measures and longitudinal studies.Talia N. ShiraziWaylon J. HastingsAsher Y. RosingerCalen P. RyanNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Talia N. Shirazi
Waylon J. Hastings
Asher Y. Rosinger
Calen P. Ryan
Parity predicts biological age acceleration in post-menopausal, but not pre-menopausal, women
description Abstract Understanding factors contributing to variation in ‘biological age’ is essential to understanding variation in susceptibility to disease and functional decline. One factor that could accelerate biological aging in women is reproduction. Pregnancy is characterized by extensive, energetically-costly changes across numerous physiological systems. These ‘costs of reproduction’ may accumulate with each pregnancy, accelerating biological aging. Despite evidence for costs of reproduction using molecular and demographic measures, it is unknown whether parity is linked to commonly-used clinical measures of biological aging. We use data collected between 1999 and 2010 from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (n = 4418) to test whether parity (number of live births) predicted four previously-validated composite measures of biological age and system integrity: Levine Method, homeostatic dysregulation, Klemera–Doubal method biological age, and allostatic load. Parity exhibited a U-shaped relationship with accelerated biological aging when controlling for chronological age, lifestyle, health-related, and demographic factors in post-menopausal, but not pre-menopausal, women, with biological age acceleration being lowest among post-menopausal women reporting between three and four live births. Our findings suggest a link between reproductive function and physiological dysregulation, and allude to possible compensatory mechanisms that buffer the effects of reproductive function on physiological dysregulation during a woman’s reproductive lifespan. Future work should continue to investigate links between parity, menopausal status, and biological age using targeted physiological measures and longitudinal studies.
format article
author Talia N. Shirazi
Waylon J. Hastings
Asher Y. Rosinger
Calen P. Ryan
author_facet Talia N. Shirazi
Waylon J. Hastings
Asher Y. Rosinger
Calen P. Ryan
author_sort Talia N. Shirazi
title Parity predicts biological age acceleration in post-menopausal, but not pre-menopausal, women
title_short Parity predicts biological age acceleration in post-menopausal, but not pre-menopausal, women
title_full Parity predicts biological age acceleration in post-menopausal, but not pre-menopausal, women
title_fullStr Parity predicts biological age acceleration in post-menopausal, but not pre-menopausal, women
title_full_unstemmed Parity predicts biological age acceleration in post-menopausal, but not pre-menopausal, women
title_sort parity predicts biological age acceleration in post-menopausal, but not pre-menopausal, women
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/27e4ba3472bb491a91e560cf05395dc0
work_keys_str_mv AT talianshirazi paritypredictsbiologicalageaccelerationinpostmenopausalbutnotpremenopausalwomen
AT waylonjhastings paritypredictsbiologicalageaccelerationinpostmenopausalbutnotpremenopausalwomen
AT asheryrosinger paritypredictsbiologicalageaccelerationinpostmenopausalbutnotpremenopausalwomen
AT calenpryan paritypredictsbiologicalageaccelerationinpostmenopausalbutnotpremenopausalwomen
_version_ 1718384458227253248