Distance Interpreting: Terminology, Taxonomy, and Key Directions of Research

The article presents a review of the current state of research on distance interpreting (DI), which is defined as information and communication technology-enabled interpreting. The relevance of this study is associated with the rapid development and dissemination of remote interpreting technology fu...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	E. S. Krasnopeyeva
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	RU
Publicado:	Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov 2021
Materias:	translation studies interpreting distance interpreting remote interpreting information and communication technology in interpreting interpreting taxonomy Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/27f85aba3c7847cd915fc3af4f006921
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:27f85aba3c7847cd915fc3af4f006921
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:27f85aba3c7847cd915fc3af4f0069212021-12-02T07:58:15ZDistance Interpreting: Terminology, Taxonomy, and Key Directions of Research2225-756X2227-129510.24224/2227-1295-2021-11-143-167https://doaj.org/article/27f85aba3c7847cd915fc3af4f0069212021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/3385https://doaj.org/toc/2225-756Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2227-1295The article presents a review of the current state of research on distance interpreting (DI), which is defined as information and communication technology-enabled interpreting. The relevance of this study is associated with the rapid development and dissemination of remote interpreting technology fuelled by the restrictions imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic. It discusses DI taxonomy and examines terminology used to refer to various DI modalities in academic and professional discourse. Names of DI services used on the websites of the major Russia’s language service providers are also discussed. The study shows that both Russian and English terminology used in the field of DI is varied and lacks stability. The article presents a short review of theoretical and methodological approaches applied in the key English-language studies of telephone interpreting, videoconference interpreting, and remote simultaneous and consecutive interpreting in different social contexts. The author pays attention to the results of a variety of studies, and describes the categories of “presence”, adaptation and multisensory integration that are essential to the interpretation of translation strategies and the nature of stress caused by DI.E. S. KrasnopeyevaTsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektovarticletranslation studiesinterpretingdistance interpretingremote interpretinginformation and communication technology in interpretinginterpreting taxonomySlavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languagesPG1-9665RUНаучный диалог, Vol 0, Iss 11, Pp 143-167 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	RU
topic	translation studies interpreting distance interpreting remote interpreting information and communication technology in interpreting interpreting taxonomy Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665
spellingShingle	translation studies interpreting distance interpreting remote interpreting information and communication technology in interpreting interpreting taxonomy Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665 E. S. Krasnopeyeva Distance Interpreting: Terminology, Taxonomy, and Key Directions of Research
description	The article presents a review of the current state of research on distance interpreting (DI), which is defined as information and communication technology-enabled interpreting. The relevance of this study is associated with the rapid development and dissemination of remote interpreting technology fuelled by the restrictions imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic. It discusses DI taxonomy and examines terminology used to refer to various DI modalities in academic and professional discourse. Names of DI services used on the websites of the major Russia’s language service providers are also discussed. The study shows that both Russian and English terminology used in the field of DI is varied and lacks stability. The article presents a short review of theoretical and methodological approaches applied in the key English-language studies of telephone interpreting, videoconference interpreting, and remote simultaneous and consecutive interpreting in different social contexts. The author pays attention to the results of a variety of studies, and describes the categories of “presence”, adaptation and multisensory integration that are essential to the interpretation of translation strategies and the nature of stress caused by DI.
format	article
author	E. S. Krasnopeyeva
author_facet	E. S. Krasnopeyeva
author_sort	E. S. Krasnopeyeva
title	Distance Interpreting: Terminology, Taxonomy, and Key Directions of Research
title_short	Distance Interpreting: Terminology, Taxonomy, and Key Directions of Research
title_full	Distance Interpreting: Terminology, Taxonomy, and Key Directions of Research
title_fullStr	Distance Interpreting: Terminology, Taxonomy, and Key Directions of Research
title_full_unstemmed	Distance Interpreting: Terminology, Taxonomy, and Key Directions of Research
title_sort	distance interpreting: terminology, taxonomy, and key directions of research
publisher	Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/27f85aba3c7847cd915fc3af4f006921
work_keys_str_mv	AT eskrasnopeyeva distanceinterpretingterminologytaxonomyandkeydirectionsofresearch
_version_	1718398711839588352

Distance Interpreting: Terminology, Taxonomy, and Key Directions of Research

Ejemplares similares