FEDERAL BUDGET 2016 AS AN INDICATOR OF STATE ECONOMIC POLICY: DRIFT OR DEVELOPMENT?

The article provides a critical assessment of the current structure of the federal budget in conditions of passive economic policy in Russia. Problematic aspects of the draft federal budget 2016 were analyzed in the context of growing adverse trends in Russian economy. Special attention was paid to...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vladimir A. Slepov, Alla Yu. Chalova, Stanislav A. Baranovskiy
Formato: article
Lenguaje:RU
Publicado: Plekhanov Russian University of Economics 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/280fcbb721a543fda1c3182f0e27167c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:280fcbb721a543fda1c3182f0e27167c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:280fcbb721a543fda1c3182f0e27167c2021-11-15T05:20:43ZFEDERAL BUDGET 2016 AS AN INDICATOR OF STATE ECONOMIC POLICY: DRIFT OR DEVELOPMENT?2413-28292587-925110.21686/2413-2829-2016-1-17-26https://doaj.org/article/280fcbb721a543fda1c3182f0e27167c2017-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://vest.rea.ru/jour/article/view/115https://doaj.org/toc/2413-2829https://doaj.org/toc/2587-9251The article provides a critical assessment of the current structure of the federal budget in conditions of passive economic policy in Russia. Problematic aspects of the draft federal budget 2016 were analyzed in the context of growing adverse trends in Russian economy. Special attention was paid to the assessment of the new format of the draft federal budget 2016, its balancing in conditions of cyclic slump and recommendations aimed at intensifying anti-recession impact of the federal budget on Russian economy. The interconnection of the federal budget and economic policy being pursued in Russia was substantiated and the necessity to revise expenses to raise anti-crisis impact on economy was shown. The authors advanced a methodological approach to estimate the influence of concrete budget expenses on GDP through fiscal multipliers for the period of one, three and five years. Recommendations were offered on structuring budget expenses by the duration of their economic effects and role in stimulating economic activity.Vladimir A. SlepovAlla Yu. ChalovaStanislav A. BaranovskiyPlekhanov Russian University of Economicsarticle«бюджет дрейфа»«бюджет развития»economic policyanti-cyclic budget policy'drift budget''development budget'anti-recession budget instrumentsbudget rulefiscal multiplierexpenses of nominal economic growthfactors of fiscal multipliers' intensifyingfactors of fiscal multipliers' weakeninganti-crisis structure of federal budgetEconomics as a scienceHB71-74RUВестник Российского экономического университета имени Г. В. Плеханова, Vol 0, Iss 1, Pp 17-26 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language RU
topic «бюджет дрейфа»
«бюджет развития»
economic policy
anti-cyclic budget policy
'drift budget'
'development budget'
anti-recession budget instruments
budget rule
fiscal multiplier
expenses of nominal economic growth
factors of fiscal multipliers' intensifying
factors of fiscal multipliers' weakening
anti-crisis structure of federal budget
Economics as a science
HB71-74
spellingShingle «бюджет дрейфа»
«бюджет развития»
economic policy
anti-cyclic budget policy
'drift budget'
'development budget'
anti-recession budget instruments
budget rule
fiscal multiplier
expenses of nominal economic growth
factors of fiscal multipliers' intensifying
factors of fiscal multipliers' weakening
anti-crisis structure of federal budget
Economics as a science
HB71-74
Vladimir A. Slepov
Alla Yu. Chalova
Stanislav A. Baranovskiy
FEDERAL BUDGET 2016 AS AN INDICATOR OF STATE ECONOMIC POLICY: DRIFT OR DEVELOPMENT?
description The article provides a critical assessment of the current structure of the federal budget in conditions of passive economic policy in Russia. Problematic aspects of the draft federal budget 2016 were analyzed in the context of growing adverse trends in Russian economy. Special attention was paid to the assessment of the new format of the draft federal budget 2016, its balancing in conditions of cyclic slump and recommendations aimed at intensifying anti-recession impact of the federal budget on Russian economy. The interconnection of the federal budget and economic policy being pursued in Russia was substantiated and the necessity to revise expenses to raise anti-crisis impact on economy was shown. The authors advanced a methodological approach to estimate the influence of concrete budget expenses on GDP through fiscal multipliers for the period of one, three and five years. Recommendations were offered on structuring budget expenses by the duration of their economic effects and role in stimulating economic activity.
format article
author Vladimir A. Slepov
Alla Yu. Chalova
Stanislav A. Baranovskiy
author_facet Vladimir A. Slepov
Alla Yu. Chalova
Stanislav A. Baranovskiy
author_sort Vladimir A. Slepov
title FEDERAL BUDGET 2016 AS AN INDICATOR OF STATE ECONOMIC POLICY: DRIFT OR DEVELOPMENT?
title_short FEDERAL BUDGET 2016 AS AN INDICATOR OF STATE ECONOMIC POLICY: DRIFT OR DEVELOPMENT?
title_full FEDERAL BUDGET 2016 AS AN INDICATOR OF STATE ECONOMIC POLICY: DRIFT OR DEVELOPMENT?
title_fullStr FEDERAL BUDGET 2016 AS AN INDICATOR OF STATE ECONOMIC POLICY: DRIFT OR DEVELOPMENT?
title_full_unstemmed FEDERAL BUDGET 2016 AS AN INDICATOR OF STATE ECONOMIC POLICY: DRIFT OR DEVELOPMENT?
title_sort federal budget 2016 as an indicator of state economic policy: drift or development?
publisher Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/280fcbb721a543fda1c3182f0e27167c
work_keys_str_mv AT vladimiraslepov federalbudget2016asanindicatorofstateeconomicpolicydriftordevelopment
AT allayuchalova federalbudget2016asanindicatorofstateeconomicpolicydriftordevelopment
AT stanislavabaranovskiy federalbudget2016asanindicatorofstateeconomicpolicydriftordevelopment
_version_ 1718428733691396096