Exploring fold space preferences of new-born and ancient protein superfamilies.
The evolution of proteins is one of the fundamental processes that has delivered the diversity and complexity of life we see around ourselves today. While we tend to define protein evolution in terms of sequence level mutations, insertions and deletions, it is hard to translate these processes to a...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/281d059860064d10a2ffe0c469bf37a2 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:281d059860064d10a2ffe0c469bf37a2 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:281d059860064d10a2ffe0c469bf37a22021-11-18T05:53:23ZExploring fold space preferences of new-born and ancient protein superfamilies.1553-734X1553-735810.1371/journal.pcbi.1003325https://doaj.org/article/281d059860064d10a2ffe0c469bf37a22013-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24244135/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1553-734Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/1553-7358The evolution of proteins is one of the fundamental processes that has delivered the diversity and complexity of life we see around ourselves today. While we tend to define protein evolution in terms of sequence level mutations, insertions and deletions, it is hard to translate these processes to a more complete picture incorporating a polypeptide's structure and function. By considering how protein structures change over time we can gain an entirely new appreciation of their long-term evolutionary dynamics. In this work we seek to identify how populations of proteins at different stages of evolution explore their possible structure space. We use an annotation of superfamily age to this space and explore the relationship between these ages and a diverse set of properties pertaining to a superfamily's sequence, structure and function. We note several marked differences between the populations of newly evolved and ancient structures, such as in their length distributions, secondary structure content and tertiary packing arrangements. In particular, many of these differences suggest a less elaborate structure for newly evolved superfamilies when compared with their ancient counterparts. We show that the structural preferences we report are not a residual effect of a more fundamental relationship with function. Furthermore, we demonstrate the robustness of our results, using significant variation in the algorithm used to estimate the ages. We present these age estimates as a useful tool to analyse protein populations. In particularly, we apply this in a comparison of domains containing greek key or jelly roll motifs.Hannah EdwardsSanne AbelnCharlotte M DeanePublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleBiology (General)QH301-705.5ENPLoS Computational Biology, Vol 9, Iss 11, p e1003325 (2013) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Biology (General) QH301-705.5 |
spellingShingle |
Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Hannah Edwards Sanne Abeln Charlotte M Deane Exploring fold space preferences of new-born and ancient protein superfamilies. |
description |
The evolution of proteins is one of the fundamental processes that has delivered the diversity and complexity of life we see around ourselves today. While we tend to define protein evolution in terms of sequence level mutations, insertions and deletions, it is hard to translate these processes to a more complete picture incorporating a polypeptide's structure and function. By considering how protein structures change over time we can gain an entirely new appreciation of their long-term evolutionary dynamics. In this work we seek to identify how populations of proteins at different stages of evolution explore their possible structure space. We use an annotation of superfamily age to this space and explore the relationship between these ages and a diverse set of properties pertaining to a superfamily's sequence, structure and function. We note several marked differences between the populations of newly evolved and ancient structures, such as in their length distributions, secondary structure content and tertiary packing arrangements. In particular, many of these differences suggest a less elaborate structure for newly evolved superfamilies when compared with their ancient counterparts. We show that the structural preferences we report are not a residual effect of a more fundamental relationship with function. Furthermore, we demonstrate the robustness of our results, using significant variation in the algorithm used to estimate the ages. We present these age estimates as a useful tool to analyse protein populations. In particularly, we apply this in a comparison of domains containing greek key or jelly roll motifs. |
format |
article |
author |
Hannah Edwards Sanne Abeln Charlotte M Deane |
author_facet |
Hannah Edwards Sanne Abeln Charlotte M Deane |
author_sort |
Hannah Edwards |
title |
Exploring fold space preferences of new-born and ancient protein superfamilies. |
title_short |
Exploring fold space preferences of new-born and ancient protein superfamilies. |
title_full |
Exploring fold space preferences of new-born and ancient protein superfamilies. |
title_fullStr |
Exploring fold space preferences of new-born and ancient protein superfamilies. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Exploring fold space preferences of new-born and ancient protein superfamilies. |
title_sort |
exploring fold space preferences of new-born and ancient protein superfamilies. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/281d059860064d10a2ffe0c469bf37a2 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hannahedwards exploringfoldspacepreferencesofnewbornandancientproteinsuperfamilies AT sanneabeln exploringfoldspacepreferencesofnewbornandancientproteinsuperfamilies AT charlottemdeane exploringfoldspacepreferencesofnewbornandancientproteinsuperfamilies |
_version_ |
1718424655171158016 |