Axillary vein access using ultrasound guidance, Venography or Cephalic Cutdown—What is the optimal access technique for insertion of pacing leads?

Abstract We reviewed the different approaches used for central vein access during insertion of cardiac implantable electronic devices. The benefits and hazards of each approach (cephalic vein cutdown, axillary vein cannulation using venography and ultrasound) are discussed. Each approach has its adv...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lloyd Davis, William Chik, Saurabh Kumar, Gopal Sivagangabalan, Stuart P. Thomas, A. Robert Denniss
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Wiley 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/281eff5e01b84808ba2d486451a85803
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:281eff5e01b84808ba2d486451a85803
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:281eff5e01b84808ba2d486451a858032021-12-02T08:25:11ZAxillary vein access using ultrasound guidance, Venography or Cephalic Cutdown—What is the optimal access technique for insertion of pacing leads?1883-21481880-427610.1002/joa3.12639https://doaj.org/article/281eff5e01b84808ba2d486451a858032021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12639https://doaj.org/toc/1880-4276https://doaj.org/toc/1883-2148Abstract We reviewed the different approaches used for central vein access during insertion of cardiac implantable electronic devices. The benefits and hazards of each approach (cephalic vein cutdown, axillary vein cannulation using venography and ultrasound) are discussed. Each approach has its advantages and hazards that need to be considered for the individual patient and balanced against the skills of the operator. The benefits of ultrasound guided venous access in reducing radiation exposure to the patient and implanter, avoiding the need for angiographic contrast and in minimizing the risk of pneumothorax and inadvertent arterial puncture are highlighted. Trainees should be taught each approach to deal with patient variability. Ultrasound guidance should be considered as a mainstream option for most patients.Lloyd DavisWilliam ChikSaurabh KumarGopal SivagangabalanStuart P. ThomasA. Robert DennissWileyarticleaxillary veinpacemakerultrasound guidanceDiseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) systemRC666-701ENJournal of Arrhythmia, Vol 37, Iss 6, Pp 1506-1511 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic axillary vein
pacemaker
ultrasound guidance
Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system
RC666-701
spellingShingle axillary vein
pacemaker
ultrasound guidance
Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system
RC666-701
Lloyd Davis
William Chik
Saurabh Kumar
Gopal Sivagangabalan
Stuart P. Thomas
A. Robert Denniss
Axillary vein access using ultrasound guidance, Venography or Cephalic Cutdown—What is the optimal access technique for insertion of pacing leads?
description Abstract We reviewed the different approaches used for central vein access during insertion of cardiac implantable electronic devices. The benefits and hazards of each approach (cephalic vein cutdown, axillary vein cannulation using venography and ultrasound) are discussed. Each approach has its advantages and hazards that need to be considered for the individual patient and balanced against the skills of the operator. The benefits of ultrasound guided venous access in reducing radiation exposure to the patient and implanter, avoiding the need for angiographic contrast and in minimizing the risk of pneumothorax and inadvertent arterial puncture are highlighted. Trainees should be taught each approach to deal with patient variability. Ultrasound guidance should be considered as a mainstream option for most patients.
format article
author Lloyd Davis
William Chik
Saurabh Kumar
Gopal Sivagangabalan
Stuart P. Thomas
A. Robert Denniss
author_facet Lloyd Davis
William Chik
Saurabh Kumar
Gopal Sivagangabalan
Stuart P. Thomas
A. Robert Denniss
author_sort Lloyd Davis
title Axillary vein access using ultrasound guidance, Venography or Cephalic Cutdown—What is the optimal access technique for insertion of pacing leads?
title_short Axillary vein access using ultrasound guidance, Venography or Cephalic Cutdown—What is the optimal access technique for insertion of pacing leads?
title_full Axillary vein access using ultrasound guidance, Venography or Cephalic Cutdown—What is the optimal access technique for insertion of pacing leads?
title_fullStr Axillary vein access using ultrasound guidance, Venography or Cephalic Cutdown—What is the optimal access technique for insertion of pacing leads?
title_full_unstemmed Axillary vein access using ultrasound guidance, Venography or Cephalic Cutdown—What is the optimal access technique for insertion of pacing leads?
title_sort axillary vein access using ultrasound guidance, venography or cephalic cutdown—what is the optimal access technique for insertion of pacing leads?
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/281eff5e01b84808ba2d486451a85803
work_keys_str_mv AT lloyddavis axillaryveinaccessusingultrasoundguidancevenographyorcephaliccutdownwhatistheoptimalaccesstechniqueforinsertionofpacingleads
AT williamchik axillaryveinaccessusingultrasoundguidancevenographyorcephaliccutdownwhatistheoptimalaccesstechniqueforinsertionofpacingleads
AT saurabhkumar axillaryveinaccessusingultrasoundguidancevenographyorcephaliccutdownwhatistheoptimalaccesstechniqueforinsertionofpacingleads
AT gopalsivagangabalan axillaryveinaccessusingultrasoundguidancevenographyorcephaliccutdownwhatistheoptimalaccesstechniqueforinsertionofpacingleads
AT stuartpthomas axillaryveinaccessusingultrasoundguidancevenographyorcephaliccutdownwhatistheoptimalaccesstechniqueforinsertionofpacingleads
AT arobertdenniss axillaryveinaccessusingultrasoundguidancevenographyorcephaliccutdownwhatistheoptimalaccesstechniqueforinsertionofpacingleads
_version_ 1718398534515949568