Axillary vein access using ultrasound guidance, Venography or Cephalic Cutdown—What is the optimal access technique for insertion of pacing leads?
Abstract We reviewed the different approaches used for central vein access during insertion of cardiac implantable electronic devices. The benefits and hazards of each approach (cephalic vein cutdown, axillary vein cannulation using venography and ultrasound) are discussed. Each approach has its adv...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Wiley
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/281eff5e01b84808ba2d486451a85803 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:281eff5e01b84808ba2d486451a85803 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:281eff5e01b84808ba2d486451a858032021-12-02T08:25:11ZAxillary vein access using ultrasound guidance, Venography or Cephalic Cutdown—What is the optimal access technique for insertion of pacing leads?1883-21481880-427610.1002/joa3.12639https://doaj.org/article/281eff5e01b84808ba2d486451a858032021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12639https://doaj.org/toc/1880-4276https://doaj.org/toc/1883-2148Abstract We reviewed the different approaches used for central vein access during insertion of cardiac implantable electronic devices. The benefits and hazards of each approach (cephalic vein cutdown, axillary vein cannulation using venography and ultrasound) are discussed. Each approach has its advantages and hazards that need to be considered for the individual patient and balanced against the skills of the operator. The benefits of ultrasound guided venous access in reducing radiation exposure to the patient and implanter, avoiding the need for angiographic contrast and in minimizing the risk of pneumothorax and inadvertent arterial puncture are highlighted. Trainees should be taught each approach to deal with patient variability. Ultrasound guidance should be considered as a mainstream option for most patients.Lloyd DavisWilliam ChikSaurabh KumarGopal SivagangabalanStuart P. ThomasA. Robert DennissWileyarticleaxillary veinpacemakerultrasound guidanceDiseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) systemRC666-701ENJournal of Arrhythmia, Vol 37, Iss 6, Pp 1506-1511 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
axillary vein pacemaker ultrasound guidance Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system RC666-701 |
spellingShingle |
axillary vein pacemaker ultrasound guidance Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system RC666-701 Lloyd Davis William Chik Saurabh Kumar Gopal Sivagangabalan Stuart P. Thomas A. Robert Denniss Axillary vein access using ultrasound guidance, Venography or Cephalic Cutdown—What is the optimal access technique for insertion of pacing leads? |
description |
Abstract We reviewed the different approaches used for central vein access during insertion of cardiac implantable electronic devices. The benefits and hazards of each approach (cephalic vein cutdown, axillary vein cannulation using venography and ultrasound) are discussed. Each approach has its advantages and hazards that need to be considered for the individual patient and balanced against the skills of the operator. The benefits of ultrasound guided venous access in reducing radiation exposure to the patient and implanter, avoiding the need for angiographic contrast and in minimizing the risk of pneumothorax and inadvertent arterial puncture are highlighted. Trainees should be taught each approach to deal with patient variability. Ultrasound guidance should be considered as a mainstream option for most patients. |
format |
article |
author |
Lloyd Davis William Chik Saurabh Kumar Gopal Sivagangabalan Stuart P. Thomas A. Robert Denniss |
author_facet |
Lloyd Davis William Chik Saurabh Kumar Gopal Sivagangabalan Stuart P. Thomas A. Robert Denniss |
author_sort |
Lloyd Davis |
title |
Axillary vein access using ultrasound guidance, Venography or Cephalic Cutdown—What is the optimal access technique for insertion of pacing leads? |
title_short |
Axillary vein access using ultrasound guidance, Venography or Cephalic Cutdown—What is the optimal access technique for insertion of pacing leads? |
title_full |
Axillary vein access using ultrasound guidance, Venography or Cephalic Cutdown—What is the optimal access technique for insertion of pacing leads? |
title_fullStr |
Axillary vein access using ultrasound guidance, Venography or Cephalic Cutdown—What is the optimal access technique for insertion of pacing leads? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Axillary vein access using ultrasound guidance, Venography or Cephalic Cutdown—What is the optimal access technique for insertion of pacing leads? |
title_sort |
axillary vein access using ultrasound guidance, venography or cephalic cutdown—what is the optimal access technique for insertion of pacing leads? |
publisher |
Wiley |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/281eff5e01b84808ba2d486451a85803 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lloyddavis axillaryveinaccessusingultrasoundguidancevenographyorcephaliccutdownwhatistheoptimalaccesstechniqueforinsertionofpacingleads AT williamchik axillaryveinaccessusingultrasoundguidancevenographyorcephaliccutdownwhatistheoptimalaccesstechniqueforinsertionofpacingleads AT saurabhkumar axillaryveinaccessusingultrasoundguidancevenographyorcephaliccutdownwhatistheoptimalaccesstechniqueforinsertionofpacingleads AT gopalsivagangabalan axillaryveinaccessusingultrasoundguidancevenographyorcephaliccutdownwhatistheoptimalaccesstechniqueforinsertionofpacingleads AT stuartpthomas axillaryveinaccessusingultrasoundguidancevenographyorcephaliccutdownwhatistheoptimalaccesstechniqueforinsertionofpacingleads AT arobertdenniss axillaryveinaccessusingultrasoundguidancevenographyorcephaliccutdownwhatistheoptimalaccesstechniqueforinsertionofpacingleads |
_version_ |
1718398534515949568 |