The structure of tardigrade communities at fine spatial scales in an Andean Polylepis forest

Little is known about distribution patterns of micrometazoan organisms at different spatial scales and the mechanisms driving these patterns across different environments. Here we explore the fine-scale structure of tardigrades in a high-elevation Polylepis forest in northern Ecuador. To investigate...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Balbina P.L. Ramsay, Nigel J. Marley, David T. Bilton, Simon D. Rundle, Paul M. Ramsay
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
ES
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/2839cde227674167befc42182c9c4227
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:2839cde227674167befc42182c9c4227
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:2839cde227674167befc42182c9c42272021-11-04T15:51:57ZThe structure of tardigrade communities at fine spatial scales in an Andean Polylepis forest2376-680810.1080/23766808.2021.1943216https://doaj.org/article/2839cde227674167befc42182c9c42272021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23766808.2021.1943216https://doaj.org/toc/2376-6808Little is known about distribution patterns of micrometazoan organisms at different spatial scales and the mechanisms driving these patterns across different environments. Here we explore the fine-scale structure of tardigrades in a high-elevation Polylepis forest in northern Ecuador. To investigate spatial patterns of tardigrade abundance, we collected samples from different bryophyte taxa (hosts) on the woodland floor. We identified some tardigrades to species, but most taxa were considered at the level of morphological operational taxonomic units. Tardigrade assemblages differed in composition between host taxa, with some tardigrade taxa associated more with certain hosts, which might relate to host architecture or chemistry. Tardigrade occupancy, richness and abundance varied considerably between samples, and we estimate that more than 50 samples are required to estimate tardigrade taxon richness in this forest habitat. Physical distance between samples was not related to similarity of composition, and it seems that fine-scale differences in environmental conditions (including the distribution of host bryophytes) is much more important in determining tardigrade composition. We conclude that standardised, comprehensive sampling of terrestrial tardigrades at fine scales is necessary before making broader comparisons at coarser geographical scales. Such sampling should account for the diversity of potential hosts, with sufficient replication to capture tardigrade diversity.Balbina P.L. RamsayNigel J. MarleyDavid T. BiltonSimon D. RundlePaul M. RamsayTaylor & Francis GrouparticletardigradabryophytelichendiversityandesEcologyQH540-549.5General. Including nature conservation, geographical distributionQH1-199.5ENESNeotropical Biodiversity, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 443-454 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
ES
topic tardigrada
bryophyte
lichen
diversity
andes
Ecology
QH540-549.5
General. Including nature conservation, geographical distribution
QH1-199.5
spellingShingle tardigrada
bryophyte
lichen
diversity
andes
Ecology
QH540-549.5
General. Including nature conservation, geographical distribution
QH1-199.5
Balbina P.L. Ramsay
Nigel J. Marley
David T. Bilton
Simon D. Rundle
Paul M. Ramsay
The structure of tardigrade communities at fine spatial scales in an Andean Polylepis forest
description Little is known about distribution patterns of micrometazoan organisms at different spatial scales and the mechanisms driving these patterns across different environments. Here we explore the fine-scale structure of tardigrades in a high-elevation Polylepis forest in northern Ecuador. To investigate spatial patterns of tardigrade abundance, we collected samples from different bryophyte taxa (hosts) on the woodland floor. We identified some tardigrades to species, but most taxa were considered at the level of morphological operational taxonomic units. Tardigrade assemblages differed in composition between host taxa, with some tardigrade taxa associated more with certain hosts, which might relate to host architecture or chemistry. Tardigrade occupancy, richness and abundance varied considerably between samples, and we estimate that more than 50 samples are required to estimate tardigrade taxon richness in this forest habitat. Physical distance between samples was not related to similarity of composition, and it seems that fine-scale differences in environmental conditions (including the distribution of host bryophytes) is much more important in determining tardigrade composition. We conclude that standardised, comprehensive sampling of terrestrial tardigrades at fine scales is necessary before making broader comparisons at coarser geographical scales. Such sampling should account for the diversity of potential hosts, with sufficient replication to capture tardigrade diversity.
format article
author Balbina P.L. Ramsay
Nigel J. Marley
David T. Bilton
Simon D. Rundle
Paul M. Ramsay
author_facet Balbina P.L. Ramsay
Nigel J. Marley
David T. Bilton
Simon D. Rundle
Paul M. Ramsay
author_sort Balbina P.L. Ramsay
title The structure of tardigrade communities at fine spatial scales in an Andean Polylepis forest
title_short The structure of tardigrade communities at fine spatial scales in an Andean Polylepis forest
title_full The structure of tardigrade communities at fine spatial scales in an Andean Polylepis forest
title_fullStr The structure of tardigrade communities at fine spatial scales in an Andean Polylepis forest
title_full_unstemmed The structure of tardigrade communities at fine spatial scales in an Andean Polylepis forest
title_sort structure of tardigrade communities at fine spatial scales in an andean polylepis forest
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/2839cde227674167befc42182c9c4227
work_keys_str_mv AT balbinaplramsay thestructureoftardigradecommunitiesatfinespatialscalesinanandeanpolylepisforest
AT nigeljmarley thestructureoftardigradecommunitiesatfinespatialscalesinanandeanpolylepisforest
AT davidtbilton thestructureoftardigradecommunitiesatfinespatialscalesinanandeanpolylepisforest
AT simondrundle thestructureoftardigradecommunitiesatfinespatialscalesinanandeanpolylepisforest
AT paulmramsay thestructureoftardigradecommunitiesatfinespatialscalesinanandeanpolylepisforest
AT balbinaplramsay structureoftardigradecommunitiesatfinespatialscalesinanandeanpolylepisforest
AT nigeljmarley structureoftardigradecommunitiesatfinespatialscalesinanandeanpolylepisforest
AT davidtbilton structureoftardigradecommunitiesatfinespatialscalesinanandeanpolylepisforest
AT simondrundle structureoftardigradecommunitiesatfinespatialscalesinanandeanpolylepisforest
AT paulmramsay structureoftardigradecommunitiesatfinespatialscalesinanandeanpolylepisforest
_version_ 1718444637074489344