Establishing the adequacy of recorded acoustic surveys of forest bird assemblages

The use of programmable acoustic recorders to survey forest birds is increasing owing to a range of advantages over surveys conducted by human observers. Users of these devices require a methodological framework for designing and testing a proposed survey protocol in context, to be assured that it h...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michael J. M. Franklin, Richard E. Major, Michael Bedward, Ross A. Bradstock
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Resilience Alliance 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/284efd1a8c794c9f9e00fe985f2c9adc
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:284efd1a8c794c9f9e00fe985f2c9adc
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:284efd1a8c794c9f9e00fe985f2c9adc2021-12-02T12:29:08ZEstablishing the adequacy of recorded acoustic surveys of forest bird assemblages1712-6568https://doaj.org/article/284efd1a8c794c9f9e00fe985f2c9adc2020-06-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.ace-eco.org/vol15/iss1/art8/https://doaj.org/toc/1712-6568The use of programmable acoustic recorders to survey forest birds is increasing owing to a range of advantages over surveys conducted by human observers. Users of these devices require a methodological framework for designing and testing a proposed survey protocol in context, to be assured that it has the capacity to efficiently meet the requirements of their study. We aimed to demonstrate how a potential acoustic survey protocol may be effectively tested by comparison with either (1) an observer-based method using species detection probabilities, or (2) the survey completeness levels among a set of other candidate acoustic protocols. Surveys using acoustic recordings (manually processed) and standardized area searches were conducted over the same period in dry sclerophyll forests of southeastern Australia. A multispecies occupancy modeling framework was used to obtain estimates of the probability of detecting individual species for both standardized searches and an acoustic protocol representing similar temporal sampling effort. Detection probabilities for 73% of species recorded using these methods were greater with the acoustic protocol than standardized searches, which established its adequacy for particular research questions. The survey methods resulted in a similar pattern of detection probabilities for foraging stratum guilds, although members of the canopy/subcanopy guild were less likely to be detected using both methods. Survey completeness (species detected/total species) was adopted as an alternative framework for acoustic protocol evaluation. The complete acoustic data set was (1) used with the incidence-based coverage estimator (ICE) to obtain the total number of species, and (2) subsampled to produce a candidate set of potentially useful survey protocols. Completeness levels ranged from 62% to 73% in the set, which provided options for subsequent protocol selection. Other ecologists may adopt one of the frameworks to establish the adequacy of their own acoustic survey protocol to suit their research question and available resources.Michael J. M. FranklinRichard E. MajorMichael BedwardRoss A. BradstockResilience Alliancearticleaudio surveybiodiversity conservationincidence-based coveragemultispecies occupancy modelingpassive acoustic monitoringsound recorderspecies detection probabilitystandardized searchsurvey completenessPlant cultureSB1-1110Environmental sciencesGE1-350Plant ecologyQK900-989ENAvian Conservation and Ecology, Vol 15, Iss 1, p 8 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic audio survey
biodiversity conservation
incidence-based coverage
multispecies occupancy modeling
passive acoustic monitoring
sound recorder
species detection probability
standardized search
survey completeness
Plant culture
SB1-1110
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Plant ecology
QK900-989
spellingShingle audio survey
biodiversity conservation
incidence-based coverage
multispecies occupancy modeling
passive acoustic monitoring
sound recorder
species detection probability
standardized search
survey completeness
Plant culture
SB1-1110
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Plant ecology
QK900-989
Michael J. M. Franklin
Richard E. Major
Michael Bedward
Ross A. Bradstock
Establishing the adequacy of recorded acoustic surveys of forest bird assemblages
description The use of programmable acoustic recorders to survey forest birds is increasing owing to a range of advantages over surveys conducted by human observers. Users of these devices require a methodological framework for designing and testing a proposed survey protocol in context, to be assured that it has the capacity to efficiently meet the requirements of their study. We aimed to demonstrate how a potential acoustic survey protocol may be effectively tested by comparison with either (1) an observer-based method using species detection probabilities, or (2) the survey completeness levels among a set of other candidate acoustic protocols. Surveys using acoustic recordings (manually processed) and standardized area searches were conducted over the same period in dry sclerophyll forests of southeastern Australia. A multispecies occupancy modeling framework was used to obtain estimates of the probability of detecting individual species for both standardized searches and an acoustic protocol representing similar temporal sampling effort. Detection probabilities for 73% of species recorded using these methods were greater with the acoustic protocol than standardized searches, which established its adequacy for particular research questions. The survey methods resulted in a similar pattern of detection probabilities for foraging stratum guilds, although members of the canopy/subcanopy guild were less likely to be detected using both methods. Survey completeness (species detected/total species) was adopted as an alternative framework for acoustic protocol evaluation. The complete acoustic data set was (1) used with the incidence-based coverage estimator (ICE) to obtain the total number of species, and (2) subsampled to produce a candidate set of potentially useful survey protocols. Completeness levels ranged from 62% to 73% in the set, which provided options for subsequent protocol selection. Other ecologists may adopt one of the frameworks to establish the adequacy of their own acoustic survey protocol to suit their research question and available resources.
format article
author Michael J. M. Franklin
Richard E. Major
Michael Bedward
Ross A. Bradstock
author_facet Michael J. M. Franklin
Richard E. Major
Michael Bedward
Ross A. Bradstock
author_sort Michael J. M. Franklin
title Establishing the adequacy of recorded acoustic surveys of forest bird assemblages
title_short Establishing the adequacy of recorded acoustic surveys of forest bird assemblages
title_full Establishing the adequacy of recorded acoustic surveys of forest bird assemblages
title_fullStr Establishing the adequacy of recorded acoustic surveys of forest bird assemblages
title_full_unstemmed Establishing the adequacy of recorded acoustic surveys of forest bird assemblages
title_sort establishing the adequacy of recorded acoustic surveys of forest bird assemblages
publisher Resilience Alliance
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/284efd1a8c794c9f9e00fe985f2c9adc
work_keys_str_mv AT michaeljmfranklin establishingtheadequacyofrecordedacousticsurveysofforestbirdassemblages
AT richardemajor establishingtheadequacyofrecordedacousticsurveysofforestbirdassemblages
AT michaelbedward establishingtheadequacyofrecordedacousticsurveysofforestbirdassemblages
AT rossabradstock establishingtheadequacyofrecordedacousticsurveysofforestbirdassemblages
_version_ 1718394443858444288