How Should Journal Editors Respond to Cases of Suspected Misconduct?

Journals and institutions have important complementary roles to play in cases of suspected research and publication misconduct. Journals should take responsibility for everything they publish and should alert institutions to cases of possible serious misconduct but should not attempt to investigate...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Elizabeth Wager
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	American Society for Microbiology 2014
Materias:	Special aspects of education LC8-6691 Biology (General) QH301-705.5
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/284f8e499139494f8a99d19e13ed6d94
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:284f8e499139494f8a99d19e13ed6d94
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:284f8e499139494f8a99d19e13ed6d942021-11-15T15:15:36ZHow Should Journal Editors Respond to Cases of Suspected Misconduct?10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.8291935-78851935-7877https://doaj.org/article/284f8e499139494f8a99d19e13ed6d942014-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.829https://doaj.org/toc/1935-7877https://doaj.org/toc/1935-7885Journals and institutions have important complementary roles to play in cases of suspected research and publication misconduct. Journals should take responsibility for everything they publish and should alert institutions to cases of possible serious misconduct but should not attempt to investigate such cases. Institutions should take responsibility for their researchers and for investigating cases of possible misconduct and for ensuring journals are informed if they have published unreliable or misleading articles so that these can be retracted or corrected. Journals and institutions should have policies in place for handling such cases and these policies should respect their different roles.Elizabeth WagerAmerican Society for MicrobiologyarticleSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691Biology (General)QH301-705.5ENJournal of Microbiology & Biology Education, Vol 15, Iss 2, Pp 146-150 (2014)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Special aspects of education LC8-6691 Biology (General) QH301-705.5
spellingShingle	Special aspects of education LC8-6691 Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Elizabeth Wager How Should Journal Editors Respond to Cases of Suspected Misconduct?
description	Journals and institutions have important complementary roles to play in cases of suspected research and publication misconduct. Journals should take responsibility for everything they publish and should alert institutions to cases of possible serious misconduct but should not attempt to investigate such cases. Institutions should take responsibility for their researchers and for investigating cases of possible misconduct and for ensuring journals are informed if they have published unreliable or misleading articles so that these can be retracted or corrected. Journals and institutions should have policies in place for handling such cases and these policies should respect their different roles.
format	article
author	Elizabeth Wager
author_facet	Elizabeth Wager
author_sort	Elizabeth Wager
title	How Should Journal Editors Respond to Cases of Suspected Misconduct?
title_short	How Should Journal Editors Respond to Cases of Suspected Misconduct?
title_full	How Should Journal Editors Respond to Cases of Suspected Misconduct?
title_fullStr	How Should Journal Editors Respond to Cases of Suspected Misconduct?
title_full_unstemmed	How Should Journal Editors Respond to Cases of Suspected Misconduct?
title_sort	how should journal editors respond to cases of suspected misconduct?
publisher	American Society for Microbiology
publishDate	2014
url	https://doaj.org/article/284f8e499139494f8a99d19e13ed6d94
work_keys_str_mv	AT elizabethwager howshouldjournaleditorsrespondtocasesofsuspectedmisconduct
_version_	1718428180240400384

How Should Journal Editors Respond to Cases of Suspected Misconduct?

Ejemplares similares