Sculpture et datation, le renouveau d’un enjeu

Based on the corpus of fourth-tenth century architecture, the corpus for sculpture of the same period in France that is being prepared includes in its fields the various arguments necessary for the dating of sculpted elements. A combination of archaeology and art history, the dating of sculptures in...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:

Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal:	Christian Sapin
Format:	article
Langue:	FR
Publié:	École du Louvre 2021
Sujets:	Early Middle Ages Carolingian Romanesque capital dating Fine Arts N Anthropology GN1-890 Archaeology CC1-960
Accès en ligne:	https://doaj.org/article/286786e0557f4b48a82383df82c5a22f
Tags:	Ajouter un tag Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:286786e0557f4b48a82383df82c5a22f
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:286786e0557f4b48a82383df82c5a22f2021-12-02T11:31:58ZSculpture et datation, le renouveau d’un enjeu2262-208X10.4000/cel.18687https://doaj.org/article/286786e0557f4b48a82383df82c5a22f2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journals.openedition.org/cel/18687https://doaj.org/toc/2262-208XBased on the corpus of fourth-tenth century architecture, the corpus for sculpture of the same period in France that is being prepared includes in its fields the various arguments necessary for the dating of sculpted elements. A combination of archaeology and art history, the dating of sculptures in earlier works was often assessed based on a single criterion, such as historical sources from the site of provenance, or formal or morphological comparisons. The estimation of the age of the capitals at Jouarre, the baptistery of Poitiers and Saint-Laurent de Grenoble was largely based on historical sources. How has this changed, now that archaeology has been able to assess these sites? How can we understand the contemporaneity of Carolingian decoration given the reused elements, replicas and new works, as at Saint-Germain d’Auxerre? It was long thought that the revival of Romanesque sculpture took place after the year 1000. Has the recent study of the frames of numerous buildings from this period been a guarantee of more precise dating through archaeometry or, on the contrary, a calling into question? What about works outside the context of known or studied monuments? All these questions are presented with examples and, we hope, the database of the proposed corpus will provide answers to them through the interaction of crossed criteria.Christian SapinÉcole du LouvrearticleEarly Middle AgesCarolingianRomanesquecapitaldatingFine ArtsNAnthropologyGN1-890ArchaeologyCC1-960FRLes Cahiers de l'École du Louvre, Vol 17 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	FR
topic	Early Middle Ages Carolingian Romanesque capital dating Fine Arts N Anthropology GN1-890 Archaeology CC1-960
spellingShingle	Early Middle Ages Carolingian Romanesque capital dating Fine Arts N Anthropology GN1-890 Archaeology CC1-960 Christian Sapin Sculpture et datation, le renouveau d’un enjeu
description	Based on the corpus of fourth-tenth century architecture, the corpus for sculpture of the same period in France that is being prepared includes in its fields the various arguments necessary for the dating of sculpted elements. A combination of archaeology and art history, the dating of sculptures in earlier works was often assessed based on a single criterion, such as historical sources from the site of provenance, or formal or morphological comparisons. The estimation of the age of the capitals at Jouarre, the baptistery of Poitiers and Saint-Laurent de Grenoble was largely based on historical sources. How has this changed, now that archaeology has been able to assess these sites? How can we understand the contemporaneity of Carolingian decoration given the reused elements, replicas and new works, as at Saint-Germain d’Auxerre? It was long thought that the revival of Romanesque sculpture took place after the year 1000. Has the recent study of the frames of numerous buildings from this period been a guarantee of more precise dating through archaeometry or, on the contrary, a calling into question? What about works outside the context of known or studied monuments? All these questions are presented with examples and, we hope, the database of the proposed corpus will provide answers to them through the interaction of crossed criteria.
format	article
author	Christian Sapin
author_facet	Christian Sapin
author_sort	Christian Sapin
title	Sculpture et datation, le renouveau d’un enjeu
title_short	Sculpture et datation, le renouveau d’un enjeu
title_full	Sculpture et datation, le renouveau d’un enjeu
title_fullStr	Sculpture et datation, le renouveau d’un enjeu
title_full_unstemmed	Sculpture et datation, le renouveau d’un enjeu
title_sort	sculpture et datation, le renouveau d’un enjeu
publisher	École du Louvre
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/286786e0557f4b48a82383df82c5a22f
work_keys_str_mv	AT christiansapin sculptureetdatationlerenouveaudunenjeu
_version_	1718395809722007552

Sculpture et datation, le renouveau d’un enjeu

Documents similaires