Facial threat affects trust more strongly than facial attractiveness in women than it does in men
Abstract Trust is essential in initiating social relationships. Due to the differential evolution of sex hormones as well as the fitness burdens of producing offspring, evaluations of a potential mating partner’s trustworthiness likely differ across sexes. Here, we explore unknown sex-specific effec...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/287ca06eb0b742e6ae8d884ba803af21 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:287ca06eb0b742e6ae8d884ba803af21 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:287ca06eb0b742e6ae8d884ba803af212021-11-21T12:20:40ZFacial threat affects trust more strongly than facial attractiveness in women than it does in men10.1038/s41598-021-01775-52045-2322https://doaj.org/article/287ca06eb0b742e6ae8d884ba803af212021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01775-5https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Trust is essential in initiating social relationships. Due to the differential evolution of sex hormones as well as the fitness burdens of producing offspring, evaluations of a potential mating partner’s trustworthiness likely differ across sexes. Here, we explore unknown sex-specific effects of facial attractiveness and threat on trusting other-sex individuals. Ninety-three participants (singles; 46 women) attracted by the other sex performed an incentivized trust game. They had to decide whether to trust individuals of the other sex represented by a priori-created face stimuli gradually varying in the intensities of both attractiveness and threat. Male and female participants trusted attractive and unthreatening-looking individuals more often. However, whereas male participants’ trust behavior was affected equally by attractiveness and threat, female participants’ trust behavior was more strongly affected by threat than by attractiveness. This indicates that a partner’s high facial attractiveness might compensate for high facial threat in male but not female participants. Our findings suggest that men and women prioritize attractiveness and threat differentially, with women paying relatively more attention to threat cues inversely signaling parental investment than to attractiveness cues signaling reproductive fitness. This difference might be attributable to an evolutionary, biologically sex-specific decision regarding parental investment and reproduction behavior.Johanna BrustkernMarkus HeinrichsMirella WalkerBastian SchillerNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Johanna Brustkern Markus Heinrichs Mirella Walker Bastian Schiller Facial threat affects trust more strongly than facial attractiveness in women than it does in men |
description |
Abstract Trust is essential in initiating social relationships. Due to the differential evolution of sex hormones as well as the fitness burdens of producing offspring, evaluations of a potential mating partner’s trustworthiness likely differ across sexes. Here, we explore unknown sex-specific effects of facial attractiveness and threat on trusting other-sex individuals. Ninety-three participants (singles; 46 women) attracted by the other sex performed an incentivized trust game. They had to decide whether to trust individuals of the other sex represented by a priori-created face stimuli gradually varying in the intensities of both attractiveness and threat. Male and female participants trusted attractive and unthreatening-looking individuals more often. However, whereas male participants’ trust behavior was affected equally by attractiveness and threat, female participants’ trust behavior was more strongly affected by threat than by attractiveness. This indicates that a partner’s high facial attractiveness might compensate for high facial threat in male but not female participants. Our findings suggest that men and women prioritize attractiveness and threat differentially, with women paying relatively more attention to threat cues inversely signaling parental investment than to attractiveness cues signaling reproductive fitness. This difference might be attributable to an evolutionary, biologically sex-specific decision regarding parental investment and reproduction behavior. |
format |
article |
author |
Johanna Brustkern Markus Heinrichs Mirella Walker Bastian Schiller |
author_facet |
Johanna Brustkern Markus Heinrichs Mirella Walker Bastian Schiller |
author_sort |
Johanna Brustkern |
title |
Facial threat affects trust more strongly than facial attractiveness in women than it does in men |
title_short |
Facial threat affects trust more strongly than facial attractiveness in women than it does in men |
title_full |
Facial threat affects trust more strongly than facial attractiveness in women than it does in men |
title_fullStr |
Facial threat affects trust more strongly than facial attractiveness in women than it does in men |
title_full_unstemmed |
Facial threat affects trust more strongly than facial attractiveness in women than it does in men |
title_sort |
facial threat affects trust more strongly than facial attractiveness in women than it does in men |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/287ca06eb0b742e6ae8d884ba803af21 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT johannabrustkern facialthreataffectstrustmorestronglythanfacialattractivenessinwomenthanitdoesinmen AT markusheinrichs facialthreataffectstrustmorestronglythanfacialattractivenessinwomenthanitdoesinmen AT mirellawalker facialthreataffectstrustmorestronglythanfacialattractivenessinwomenthanitdoesinmen AT bastianschiller facialthreataffectstrustmorestronglythanfacialattractivenessinwomenthanitdoesinmen |
_version_ |
1718419053510393856 |