Facial threat affects trust more strongly than facial attractiveness in women than it does in men

Abstract Trust is essential in initiating social relationships. Due to the differential evolution of sex hormones as well as the fitness burdens of producing offspring, evaluations of a potential mating partner’s trustworthiness likely differ across sexes. Here, we explore unknown sex-specific effec...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johanna Brustkern, Markus Heinrichs, Mirella Walker, Bastian Schiller
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/287ca06eb0b742e6ae8d884ba803af21
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:287ca06eb0b742e6ae8d884ba803af21
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:287ca06eb0b742e6ae8d884ba803af212021-11-21T12:20:40ZFacial threat affects trust more strongly than facial attractiveness in women than it does in men10.1038/s41598-021-01775-52045-2322https://doaj.org/article/287ca06eb0b742e6ae8d884ba803af212021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01775-5https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Trust is essential in initiating social relationships. Due to the differential evolution of sex hormones as well as the fitness burdens of producing offspring, evaluations of a potential mating partner’s trustworthiness likely differ across sexes. Here, we explore unknown sex-specific effects of facial attractiveness and threat on trusting other-sex individuals. Ninety-three participants (singles; 46 women) attracted by the other sex performed an incentivized trust game. They had to decide whether to trust individuals of the other sex represented by a priori-created face stimuli gradually varying in the intensities of both attractiveness and threat. Male and female participants trusted attractive and unthreatening-looking individuals more often. However, whereas male participants’ trust behavior was affected equally by attractiveness and threat, female participants’ trust behavior was more strongly affected by threat than by attractiveness. This indicates that a partner’s high facial attractiveness might compensate for high facial threat in male but not female participants. Our findings suggest that men and women prioritize attractiveness and threat differentially, with women paying relatively more attention to threat cues inversely signaling parental investment than to attractiveness cues signaling reproductive fitness. This difference might be attributable to an evolutionary, biologically sex-specific decision regarding parental investment and reproduction behavior.Johanna BrustkernMarkus HeinrichsMirella WalkerBastian SchillerNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Johanna Brustkern
Markus Heinrichs
Mirella Walker
Bastian Schiller
Facial threat affects trust more strongly than facial attractiveness in women than it does in men
description Abstract Trust is essential in initiating social relationships. Due to the differential evolution of sex hormones as well as the fitness burdens of producing offspring, evaluations of a potential mating partner’s trustworthiness likely differ across sexes. Here, we explore unknown sex-specific effects of facial attractiveness and threat on trusting other-sex individuals. Ninety-three participants (singles; 46 women) attracted by the other sex performed an incentivized trust game. They had to decide whether to trust individuals of the other sex represented by a priori-created face stimuli gradually varying in the intensities of both attractiveness and threat. Male and female participants trusted attractive and unthreatening-looking individuals more often. However, whereas male participants’ trust behavior was affected equally by attractiveness and threat, female participants’ trust behavior was more strongly affected by threat than by attractiveness. This indicates that a partner’s high facial attractiveness might compensate for high facial threat in male but not female participants. Our findings suggest that men and women prioritize attractiveness and threat differentially, with women paying relatively more attention to threat cues inversely signaling parental investment than to attractiveness cues signaling reproductive fitness. This difference might be attributable to an evolutionary, biologically sex-specific decision regarding parental investment and reproduction behavior.
format article
author Johanna Brustkern
Markus Heinrichs
Mirella Walker
Bastian Schiller
author_facet Johanna Brustkern
Markus Heinrichs
Mirella Walker
Bastian Schiller
author_sort Johanna Brustkern
title Facial threat affects trust more strongly than facial attractiveness in women than it does in men
title_short Facial threat affects trust more strongly than facial attractiveness in women than it does in men
title_full Facial threat affects trust more strongly than facial attractiveness in women than it does in men
title_fullStr Facial threat affects trust more strongly than facial attractiveness in women than it does in men
title_full_unstemmed Facial threat affects trust more strongly than facial attractiveness in women than it does in men
title_sort facial threat affects trust more strongly than facial attractiveness in women than it does in men
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/287ca06eb0b742e6ae8d884ba803af21
work_keys_str_mv AT johannabrustkern facialthreataffectstrustmorestronglythanfacialattractivenessinwomenthanitdoesinmen
AT markusheinrichs facialthreataffectstrustmorestronglythanfacialattractivenessinwomenthanitdoesinmen
AT mirellawalker facialthreataffectstrustmorestronglythanfacialattractivenessinwomenthanitdoesinmen
AT bastianschiller facialthreataffectstrustmorestronglythanfacialattractivenessinwomenthanitdoesinmen
_version_ 1718419053510393856