Risk, unexpected uncertainty, and estimation uncertainty: Bayesian learning in unstable settings.

Recently, evidence has emerged that humans approach learning using Bayesian updating rather than (model-free) reinforcement algorithms in a six-arm restless bandit problem. Here, we investigate what this implies for human appreciation of uncertainty. In our task, a Bayesian learner distinguishes thr...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elise Payzan-LeNestour, Peter Bossaerts
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/288f655dafb4488386e9caabcdee5ab1
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:288f655dafb4488386e9caabcdee5ab1
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:288f655dafb4488386e9caabcdee5ab12021-11-18T05:50:47ZRisk, unexpected uncertainty, and estimation uncertainty: Bayesian learning in unstable settings.1553-734X1553-735810.1371/journal.pcbi.1001048https://doaj.org/article/288f655dafb4488386e9caabcdee5ab12011-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/21283774/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1553-734Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/1553-7358Recently, evidence has emerged that humans approach learning using Bayesian updating rather than (model-free) reinforcement algorithms in a six-arm restless bandit problem. Here, we investigate what this implies for human appreciation of uncertainty. In our task, a Bayesian learner distinguishes three equally salient levels of uncertainty. First, the Bayesian perceives irreducible uncertainty or risk: even knowing the payoff probabilities of a given arm, the outcome remains uncertain. Second, there is (parameter) estimation uncertainty or ambiguity: payoff probabilities are unknown and need to be estimated. Third, the outcome probabilities of the arms change: the sudden jumps are referred to as unexpected uncertainty. We document how the three levels of uncertainty evolved during the course of our experiment and how it affected the learning rate. We then zoom in on estimation uncertainty, which has been suggested to be a driving force in exploration, in spite of evidence of widespread aversion to ambiguity. Our data corroborate the latter. We discuss neural evidence that foreshadowed the ability of humans to distinguish between the three levels of uncertainty. Finally, we investigate the boundaries of human capacity to implement Bayesian learning. We repeat the experiment with different instructions, reflecting varying levels of structural uncertainty. Under this fourth notion of uncertainty, choices were no better explained by Bayesian updating than by (model-free) reinforcement learning. Exit questionnaires revealed that participants remained unaware of the presence of unexpected uncertainty and failed to acquire the right model with which to implement Bayesian updating.Elise Payzan-LeNestourPeter BossaertsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleBiology (General)QH301-705.5ENPLoS Computational Biology, Vol 7, Iss 1, p e1001048 (2011)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
spellingShingle Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Elise Payzan-LeNestour
Peter Bossaerts
Risk, unexpected uncertainty, and estimation uncertainty: Bayesian learning in unstable settings.
description Recently, evidence has emerged that humans approach learning using Bayesian updating rather than (model-free) reinforcement algorithms in a six-arm restless bandit problem. Here, we investigate what this implies for human appreciation of uncertainty. In our task, a Bayesian learner distinguishes three equally salient levels of uncertainty. First, the Bayesian perceives irreducible uncertainty or risk: even knowing the payoff probabilities of a given arm, the outcome remains uncertain. Second, there is (parameter) estimation uncertainty or ambiguity: payoff probabilities are unknown and need to be estimated. Third, the outcome probabilities of the arms change: the sudden jumps are referred to as unexpected uncertainty. We document how the three levels of uncertainty evolved during the course of our experiment and how it affected the learning rate. We then zoom in on estimation uncertainty, which has been suggested to be a driving force in exploration, in spite of evidence of widespread aversion to ambiguity. Our data corroborate the latter. We discuss neural evidence that foreshadowed the ability of humans to distinguish between the three levels of uncertainty. Finally, we investigate the boundaries of human capacity to implement Bayesian learning. We repeat the experiment with different instructions, reflecting varying levels of structural uncertainty. Under this fourth notion of uncertainty, choices were no better explained by Bayesian updating than by (model-free) reinforcement learning. Exit questionnaires revealed that participants remained unaware of the presence of unexpected uncertainty and failed to acquire the right model with which to implement Bayesian updating.
format article
author Elise Payzan-LeNestour
Peter Bossaerts
author_facet Elise Payzan-LeNestour
Peter Bossaerts
author_sort Elise Payzan-LeNestour
title Risk, unexpected uncertainty, and estimation uncertainty: Bayesian learning in unstable settings.
title_short Risk, unexpected uncertainty, and estimation uncertainty: Bayesian learning in unstable settings.
title_full Risk, unexpected uncertainty, and estimation uncertainty: Bayesian learning in unstable settings.
title_fullStr Risk, unexpected uncertainty, and estimation uncertainty: Bayesian learning in unstable settings.
title_full_unstemmed Risk, unexpected uncertainty, and estimation uncertainty: Bayesian learning in unstable settings.
title_sort risk, unexpected uncertainty, and estimation uncertainty: bayesian learning in unstable settings.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2011
url https://doaj.org/article/288f655dafb4488386e9caabcdee5ab1
work_keys_str_mv AT elisepayzanlenestour riskunexpecteduncertaintyandestimationuncertaintybayesianlearninginunstablesettings
AT peterbossaerts riskunexpecteduncertaintyandestimationuncertaintybayesianlearninginunstablesettings
_version_ 1718424776069873664