Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for COVID 2019-Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Comparison between First and Second Waves (Stage 2)

We aimed to compare the outcomes of patients under veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) for COVID-19-Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (CARDS) between the first and the second wave. From 1 March 2020 to 30 November 2020, fifty patients requiring a V-V ECMO support for CARDS w...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nicolas Dognon, Alexandre Gaudet, Erika Parmentier-Decrucq, Sylvain Normandin, André Vincentelli, Mouhamed Moussa, Julien Poissy, Thibault Duburcq, Lille Intensive Care COVID-19 Group
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/28964268c2854417b3ab3d2b8ea683bc
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:28964268c2854417b3ab3d2b8ea683bc
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:28964268c2854417b3ab3d2b8ea683bc2021-11-11T17:30:29ZExtracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for COVID 2019-Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Comparison between First and Second Waves (Stage 2)10.3390/jcm102148392077-0383https://doaj.org/article/28964268c2854417b3ab3d2b8ea683bc2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/21/4839https://doaj.org/toc/2077-0383We aimed to compare the outcomes of patients under veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) for COVID-19-Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (CARDS) between the first and the second wave. From 1 March 2020 to 30 November 2020, fifty patients requiring a V-V ECMO support for CARDS were included. Patient demographics, pre-ECMO, and day one, three, and seven on-ECMO data and outcomes were collected. The 90-day mortality was 11% higher during the second wave (18/26 (69%)) compared to the first wave (14/24 (58%) (<i>p</i> = 0.423). During the second wave, all of the patients were given steroids compared to 16.7% during the first wave (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The second wave’s patients had been on non-invasive ventilation support for a longer period than in the first wave, with the median time from ICU admission to ECMO implantation being significantly higher (14 (11–20) vs. 7.7 (5–12) days; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Mechanical properties of the lung were worsened in the second wave’s CARDS patients before ECMO implantation (median static compliance 20 (16–26) vs. 29 (25–37) mL/cmH2O; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and during ECMO days one, three, and seven. More bacterial co-infections before implantation and under ECMO were documented in the second wave group. Despite a better evidence-driven critical care management, we depicted fewer encouraging outcomes during the second wave.Nicolas DognonAlexandre GaudetErika Parmentier-DecrucqSylvain NormandinAndré VincentelliMouhamed MoussaJulien PoissyThibault DuburcqLille Intensive Care COVID-19 GroupMDPI AGarticleextracorporeal membrane oxygenationCOVID 2019acute respiratory distress syndromeoutbreak wavesrespiratory driveventilator-associated pneumoniaMedicineRENJournal of Clinical Medicine, Vol 10, Iss 4839, p 4839 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
COVID 2019
acute respiratory distress syndrome
outbreak waves
respiratory drive
ventilator-associated pneumonia
Medicine
R
spellingShingle extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
COVID 2019
acute respiratory distress syndrome
outbreak waves
respiratory drive
ventilator-associated pneumonia
Medicine
R
Nicolas Dognon
Alexandre Gaudet
Erika Parmentier-Decrucq
Sylvain Normandin
André Vincentelli
Mouhamed Moussa
Julien Poissy
Thibault Duburcq
Lille Intensive Care COVID-19 Group
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for COVID 2019-Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Comparison between First and Second Waves (Stage 2)
description We aimed to compare the outcomes of patients under veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) for COVID-19-Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (CARDS) between the first and the second wave. From 1 March 2020 to 30 November 2020, fifty patients requiring a V-V ECMO support for CARDS were included. Patient demographics, pre-ECMO, and day one, three, and seven on-ECMO data and outcomes were collected. The 90-day mortality was 11% higher during the second wave (18/26 (69%)) compared to the first wave (14/24 (58%) (<i>p</i> = 0.423). During the second wave, all of the patients were given steroids compared to 16.7% during the first wave (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The second wave’s patients had been on non-invasive ventilation support for a longer period than in the first wave, with the median time from ICU admission to ECMO implantation being significantly higher (14 (11–20) vs. 7.7 (5–12) days; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Mechanical properties of the lung were worsened in the second wave’s CARDS patients before ECMO implantation (median static compliance 20 (16–26) vs. 29 (25–37) mL/cmH2O; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and during ECMO days one, three, and seven. More bacterial co-infections before implantation and under ECMO were documented in the second wave group. Despite a better evidence-driven critical care management, we depicted fewer encouraging outcomes during the second wave.
format article
author Nicolas Dognon
Alexandre Gaudet
Erika Parmentier-Decrucq
Sylvain Normandin
André Vincentelli
Mouhamed Moussa
Julien Poissy
Thibault Duburcq
Lille Intensive Care COVID-19 Group
author_facet Nicolas Dognon
Alexandre Gaudet
Erika Parmentier-Decrucq
Sylvain Normandin
André Vincentelli
Mouhamed Moussa
Julien Poissy
Thibault Duburcq
Lille Intensive Care COVID-19 Group
author_sort Nicolas Dognon
title Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for COVID 2019-Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Comparison between First and Second Waves (Stage 2)
title_short Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for COVID 2019-Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Comparison between First and Second Waves (Stage 2)
title_full Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for COVID 2019-Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Comparison between First and Second Waves (Stage 2)
title_fullStr Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for COVID 2019-Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Comparison between First and Second Waves (Stage 2)
title_full_unstemmed Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for COVID 2019-Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Comparison between First and Second Waves (Stage 2)
title_sort extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for covid 2019-acute respiratory distress syndrome: comparison between first and second waves (stage 2)
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/28964268c2854417b3ab3d2b8ea683bc
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolasdognon extracorporealmembraneoxygenationforcovid2019acuterespiratorydistresssyndromecomparisonbetweenfirstandsecondwavesstage2
AT alexandregaudet extracorporealmembraneoxygenationforcovid2019acuterespiratorydistresssyndromecomparisonbetweenfirstandsecondwavesstage2
AT erikaparmentierdecrucq extracorporealmembraneoxygenationforcovid2019acuterespiratorydistresssyndromecomparisonbetweenfirstandsecondwavesstage2
AT sylvainnormandin extracorporealmembraneoxygenationforcovid2019acuterespiratorydistresssyndromecomparisonbetweenfirstandsecondwavesstage2
AT andrevincentelli extracorporealmembraneoxygenationforcovid2019acuterespiratorydistresssyndromecomparisonbetweenfirstandsecondwavesstage2
AT mouhamedmoussa extracorporealmembraneoxygenationforcovid2019acuterespiratorydistresssyndromecomparisonbetweenfirstandsecondwavesstage2
AT julienpoissy extracorporealmembraneoxygenationforcovid2019acuterespiratorydistresssyndromecomparisonbetweenfirstandsecondwavesstage2
AT thibaultduburcq extracorporealmembraneoxygenationforcovid2019acuterespiratorydistresssyndromecomparisonbetweenfirstandsecondwavesstage2
AT lilleintensivecarecovid19group extracorporealmembraneoxygenationforcovid2019acuterespiratorydistresssyndromecomparisonbetweenfirstandsecondwavesstage2
_version_ 1718432051771736064