Energy Performance Comparison of Heat Pump and Power Cycles in Waste Heat Recovery

A chemical process usually needs to combust fossil fuels to provide the energy required for production, then a large number of low temperature waste heat is discharged to the environment. Recovery of such waste heat plays an important role in saving primary energy and protecting the environment. The...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhimin Tan, Xiao Feng, Yufei Wang
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: AIDIC Servizi S.r.l. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/28a5a1c7d8534d7f97f04d9a6defe29f
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:28a5a1c7d8534d7f97f04d9a6defe29f
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:28a5a1c7d8534d7f97f04d9a6defe29f2021-11-15T21:47:42ZEnergy Performance Comparison of Heat Pump and Power Cycles in Waste Heat Recovery10.3303/CET21881312283-9216https://doaj.org/article/28a5a1c7d8534d7f97f04d9a6defe29f2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/11924https://doaj.org/toc/2283-9216A chemical process usually needs to combust fossil fuels to provide the energy required for production, then a large number of low temperature waste heat is discharged to the environment. Recovery of such waste heat plays an important role in saving primary energy and protecting the environment. There are many waste heat recovery technologies, among which heat pump and power cycles are widely used. In order to make a proper choice of the utilization mode for the low temperature waste heat, the simulation models of mechanical heat pump, steam turbine and Organic Rankine Cycle are established in this paper. Calculations are made under different waste steam temperatures (100 °C to 150 °C) and different heat pump temperature lifts (10 °C, 15 °C, 30 °C). Exergy efficiency is used as the index to compare the energy performance of the three waste heat recovery cycles. The results show that the exergy efficiency of the mechanical heat pump is always higher than 0.9, while that of the Organic Rankine Cycle and steam turbine is between 0.3 and 0.5. The exergy efficiency of the mechanical heat pump is always highest under any working conditions. Based on energy performance, the mechanical heat pump is always a better choice than a power cycle in low-temperature waste heat recovery. Besides, the energy performance of the Organic Rankine Cycle is better than that of the steam turbine. This article compares these two waste heat recovery technologies with completely different working principles, and can provide a reference for factories to choose a suitable waste heat recovery technology.Zhimin TanXiao FengYufei WangAIDIC Servizi S.r.l.articleChemical engineeringTP155-156Computer engineering. Computer hardwareTK7885-7895ENChemical Engineering Transactions, Vol 88 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Chemical engineering
TP155-156
Computer engineering. Computer hardware
TK7885-7895
spellingShingle Chemical engineering
TP155-156
Computer engineering. Computer hardware
TK7885-7895
Zhimin Tan
Xiao Feng
Yufei Wang
Energy Performance Comparison of Heat Pump and Power Cycles in Waste Heat Recovery
description A chemical process usually needs to combust fossil fuels to provide the energy required for production, then a large number of low temperature waste heat is discharged to the environment. Recovery of such waste heat plays an important role in saving primary energy and protecting the environment. There are many waste heat recovery technologies, among which heat pump and power cycles are widely used. In order to make a proper choice of the utilization mode for the low temperature waste heat, the simulation models of mechanical heat pump, steam turbine and Organic Rankine Cycle are established in this paper. Calculations are made under different waste steam temperatures (100 °C to 150 °C) and different heat pump temperature lifts (10 °C, 15 °C, 30 °C). Exergy efficiency is used as the index to compare the energy performance of the three waste heat recovery cycles. The results show that the exergy efficiency of the mechanical heat pump is always higher than 0.9, while that of the Organic Rankine Cycle and steam turbine is between 0.3 and 0.5. The exergy efficiency of the mechanical heat pump is always highest under any working conditions. Based on energy performance, the mechanical heat pump is always a better choice than a power cycle in low-temperature waste heat recovery. Besides, the energy performance of the Organic Rankine Cycle is better than that of the steam turbine. This article compares these two waste heat recovery technologies with completely different working principles, and can provide a reference for factories to choose a suitable waste heat recovery technology.
format article
author Zhimin Tan
Xiao Feng
Yufei Wang
author_facet Zhimin Tan
Xiao Feng
Yufei Wang
author_sort Zhimin Tan
title Energy Performance Comparison of Heat Pump and Power Cycles in Waste Heat Recovery
title_short Energy Performance Comparison of Heat Pump and Power Cycles in Waste Heat Recovery
title_full Energy Performance Comparison of Heat Pump and Power Cycles in Waste Heat Recovery
title_fullStr Energy Performance Comparison of Heat Pump and Power Cycles in Waste Heat Recovery
title_full_unstemmed Energy Performance Comparison of Heat Pump and Power Cycles in Waste Heat Recovery
title_sort energy performance comparison of heat pump and power cycles in waste heat recovery
publisher AIDIC Servizi S.r.l.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/28a5a1c7d8534d7f97f04d9a6defe29f
work_keys_str_mv AT zhimintan energyperformancecomparisonofheatpumpandpowercyclesinwasteheatrecovery
AT xiaofeng energyperformancecomparisonofheatpumpandpowercyclesinwasteheatrecovery
AT yufeiwang energyperformancecomparisonofheatpumpandpowercyclesinwasteheatrecovery
_version_ 1718426772392902656