Validation of the SDM Process Scale to Evaluate Shared Decision-Making at Clinical Sites

The Shared Decision-Making (SDM) Process scale (scored 0-4) uses 4 questions about decision-making behaviors: discussion of options, pros, cons, and preferences. We use data from mail surveys of patients who made surgical decisions at 9 clinical sites and a national web survey to assess the reliabil...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Floyd J. Fowler PhD, Karen R. Sepucha PhD, Vickie Stringfellow BA, KD Valentine PhD
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	SAGE Publishing 2021
Materias:	Medicine (General) R5-920
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/28f4731e5ee647ad999798e13145bbd4
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:28f4731e5ee647ad999798e13145bbd4
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:28f4731e5ee647ad999798e13145bbd42021-12-01T23:05:31ZValidation of the SDM Process Scale to Evaluate Shared Decision-Making at Clinical Sites2374-374310.1177/23743735211060811https://doaj.org/article/28f4731e5ee647ad999798e13145bbd42021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1177/23743735211060811https://doaj.org/toc/2374-3743The Shared Decision-Making (SDM) Process scale (scored 0-4) uses 4 questions about decision-making behaviors: discussion of options, pros, cons, and preferences. We use data from mail surveys of patients who made surgical decisions at 9 clinical sites and a national web survey to assess the reliability and validity of the measure to assess shared decision-making at clinical sites. Patients at sites using decision aids to promote shared decision-making for hip, knee, back, or breast cancer surgery had significantly higher scores than national cross-section samples of surgical patients for 3 of 4 comparisons and significantly higher scores for both comparisons with “usual care sites.” Reliability was supported by an intra-class correlation at the clinical site level of 0.93 and an average correlation of SDM scores for knee and hip surgery patients treated at the same sites of 0.56. The results document the reliability and validity of the measure to assess the degree of shared decision-making for surgical decisions at clinical sites.Floyd J. Fowler PhDKaren R. Sepucha PhDVickie Stringfellow BAKD Valentine PhDSAGE PublishingarticleMedicine (General)R5-920ENJournal of Patient Experience, Vol 8 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine (General) R5-920
spellingShingle	Medicine (General) R5-920 Floyd J. Fowler PhD Karen R. Sepucha PhD Vickie Stringfellow BA KD Valentine PhD Validation of the SDM Process Scale to Evaluate Shared Decision-Making at Clinical Sites
description	The Shared Decision-Making (SDM) Process scale (scored 0-4) uses 4 questions about decision-making behaviors: discussion of options, pros, cons, and preferences. We use data from mail surveys of patients who made surgical decisions at 9 clinical sites and a national web survey to assess the reliability and validity of the measure to assess shared decision-making at clinical sites. Patients at sites using decision aids to promote shared decision-making for hip, knee, back, or breast cancer surgery had significantly higher scores than national cross-section samples of surgical patients for 3 of 4 comparisons and significantly higher scores for both comparisons with “usual care sites.” Reliability was supported by an intra-class correlation at the clinical site level of 0.93 and an average correlation of SDM scores for knee and hip surgery patients treated at the same sites of 0.56. The results document the reliability and validity of the measure to assess the degree of shared decision-making for surgical decisions at clinical sites.
format	article
author	Floyd J. Fowler PhD Karen R. Sepucha PhD Vickie Stringfellow BA KD Valentine PhD
author_facet	Floyd J. Fowler PhD Karen R. Sepucha PhD Vickie Stringfellow BA KD Valentine PhD
author_sort	Floyd J. Fowler PhD
title	Validation of the SDM Process Scale to Evaluate Shared Decision-Making at Clinical Sites
title_short	Validation of the SDM Process Scale to Evaluate Shared Decision-Making at Clinical Sites
title_full	Validation of the SDM Process Scale to Evaluate Shared Decision-Making at Clinical Sites
title_fullStr	Validation of the SDM Process Scale to Evaluate Shared Decision-Making at Clinical Sites
title_full_unstemmed	Validation of the SDM Process Scale to Evaluate Shared Decision-Making at Clinical Sites
title_sort	validation of the sdm process scale to evaluate shared decision-making at clinical sites
publisher	SAGE Publishing
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/28f4731e5ee647ad999798e13145bbd4
work_keys_str_mv	AT floydjfowlerphd validationofthesdmprocessscaletoevaluateshareddecisionmakingatclinicalsites AT karenrsepuchaphd validationofthesdmprocessscaletoevaluateshareddecisionmakingatclinicalsites AT vickiestringfellowba validationofthesdmprocessscaletoevaluateshareddecisionmakingatclinicalsites AT kdvalentinephd validationofthesdmprocessscaletoevaluateshareddecisionmakingatclinicalsites
_version_	1718404031522537472

Validation of the SDM Process Scale to Evaluate Shared Decision-Making at Clinical Sites

Ejemplares similares