Geertz versus Levi-Strauss: latent structural dispositions in Geertz "theory of culture"?

These are two authors, in Foucauldian terms that certainly belong to the most influential individuals in socio-cultural anthropology, as well as in the social sciences and interdisciplinary research more broadly. Claude Levi- Strauss became some kind of an "intellectual hero" during the do...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Gordana Gorunović
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
FR
SR
Publicado: University of Belgrade 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/28fa240c56634125aa1a635ea7772474
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:28fa240c56634125aa1a635ea7772474
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:28fa240c56634125aa1a635ea77724742021-12-02T02:04:30ZGeertz versus Levi-Strauss: latent structural dispositions in Geertz "theory of culture"?0353-15892334-8801https://doaj.org/article/28fa240c56634125aa1a635ea77724742016-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://eap-iea.org/novi-ojs/index.php/eap/article/view/295https://doaj.org/toc/0353-1589https://doaj.org/toc/2334-8801These are two authors, in Foucauldian terms that certainly belong to the most influential individuals in socio-cultural anthropology, as well as in the social sciences and interdisciplinary research more broadly. Claude Levi- Strauss became some kind of an "intellectual hero" during the domination of structuralism in the mid-twentieth century and during the 1960s, while Clifford Geertz was an ‘icon and ambassador’ of anthropology in the second half of the twentieth century. They are both one of the founders of the discourse theory. They not only established a distinct theoretical approaches and methods – structural (Levi-Strauss) and interpretative anthropology (Clifford Geertz), but through their intellectual authority they also inspired paradigms and intellectual movements making structuralism and "interpretation of culture" more than some passing episodes in the history of social though (in terms of "trendy ideas"). My aim is to make some parallels between these two authors, who despite all the differences that are evident in their epistemological discourses, theoretical approaches and methods (as well as in their ethnographic and anthropological writings itself) still have some similarities in their theorisation and interpretation of culture, which I would like to stress in this paper.Gordana GorunovićUniversity of BelgradearticleAnthropologyGN1-890ENFRSREtnoantropološki Problemi, Vol 4, Iss 2 (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
FR
SR
topic Anthropology
GN1-890
spellingShingle Anthropology
GN1-890
Gordana Gorunović
Geertz versus Levi-Strauss: latent structural dispositions in Geertz "theory of culture"?
description These are two authors, in Foucauldian terms that certainly belong to the most influential individuals in socio-cultural anthropology, as well as in the social sciences and interdisciplinary research more broadly. Claude Levi- Strauss became some kind of an "intellectual hero" during the domination of structuralism in the mid-twentieth century and during the 1960s, while Clifford Geertz was an ‘icon and ambassador’ of anthropology in the second half of the twentieth century. They are both one of the founders of the discourse theory. They not only established a distinct theoretical approaches and methods – structural (Levi-Strauss) and interpretative anthropology (Clifford Geertz), but through their intellectual authority they also inspired paradigms and intellectual movements making structuralism and "interpretation of culture" more than some passing episodes in the history of social though (in terms of "trendy ideas"). My aim is to make some parallels between these two authors, who despite all the differences that are evident in their epistemological discourses, theoretical approaches and methods (as well as in their ethnographic and anthropological writings itself) still have some similarities in their theorisation and interpretation of culture, which I would like to stress in this paper.
format article
author Gordana Gorunović
author_facet Gordana Gorunović
author_sort Gordana Gorunović
title Geertz versus Levi-Strauss: latent structural dispositions in Geertz "theory of culture"?
title_short Geertz versus Levi-Strauss: latent structural dispositions in Geertz "theory of culture"?
title_full Geertz versus Levi-Strauss: latent structural dispositions in Geertz "theory of culture"?
title_fullStr Geertz versus Levi-Strauss: latent structural dispositions in Geertz "theory of culture"?
title_full_unstemmed Geertz versus Levi-Strauss: latent structural dispositions in Geertz "theory of culture"?
title_sort geertz versus levi-strauss: latent structural dispositions in geertz "theory of culture"?
publisher University of Belgrade
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/28fa240c56634125aa1a635ea7772474
work_keys_str_mv AT gordanagorunovic geertzversuslevistrausslatentstructuraldispositionsingeertztheoryofculture
_version_ 1718402699027808256