Effectiveness of Peer-Led Wellbeing Interventions in Retirement Living: A Systematic Review

Retirement living (RL) communities may be an ideal setting in which to utilize peer-leaders to implement or support health and wellbeing interventions. To date, this literature has not been systematically summarized. The purpose of this study was to fill this gap with a particular focus on describin...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Lilian Barras, Maike Neuhaus, Elizabeth V. Cyarto, Natasha Reid
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	MDPI AG 2021
Materias:	peer-led intervention retirement living well-being longevity healthy ageing Medicine R
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/28fb71f64f10466aac277c9b1cfd9439
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:28fb71f64f10466aac277c9b1cfd9439
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:28fb71f64f10466aac277c9b1cfd94392021-11-11T16:40:10ZEffectiveness of Peer-Led Wellbeing Interventions in Retirement Living: A Systematic Review10.3390/ijerph1821115571660-46011661-7827https://doaj.org/article/28fb71f64f10466aac277c9b1cfd94392021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11557https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601Retirement living (RL) communities may be an ideal setting in which to utilize peer-leaders to implement or support health and wellbeing interventions. To date, this literature has not been systematically summarized. The purpose of this study was to fill this gap with a particular focus on describing the extent to which interventions addressed each level of the social ecological model of behavior change. This review utilized established frameworks for assessing methodological quality of studies, including the CONSORT guidelines and RoB2 bias assessment for cluster randomized controlled trials. A total of 153 records were identified from database searches, and seven studies met inclusion criteria. Overall, there is emerging evidence that peer-led health and wellbeing programs in RL communities can positively impact both health behavior, such as increased physical activity or nutrition, and health status, such as lower blood pressure. The study quality was modest to very good, but only one study was deemed not to have a high risk of bias. Peers are generally cost-effective, more accessible, and relatable leaders for health interventions that can still produce impactful changes. Future studies are needed to better understand how to sustain promising interventions.Lilian BarrasMaike NeuhausElizabeth V. CyartoNatasha ReidMDPI AGarticlepeer-ledinterventionretirement livingwell-beinglongevityhealthy ageingMedicineRENInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol 18, Iss 11557, p 11557 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	peer-led intervention retirement living well-being longevity healthy ageing Medicine R
spellingShingle	peer-led intervention retirement living well-being longevity healthy ageing Medicine R Lilian Barras Maike Neuhaus Elizabeth V. Cyarto Natasha Reid Effectiveness of Peer-Led Wellbeing Interventions in Retirement Living: A Systematic Review
description	Retirement living (RL) communities may be an ideal setting in which to utilize peer-leaders to implement or support health and wellbeing interventions. To date, this literature has not been systematically summarized. The purpose of this study was to fill this gap with a particular focus on describing the extent to which interventions addressed each level of the social ecological model of behavior change. This review utilized established frameworks for assessing methodological quality of studies, including the CONSORT guidelines and RoB2 bias assessment for cluster randomized controlled trials. A total of 153 records were identified from database searches, and seven studies met inclusion criteria. Overall, there is emerging evidence that peer-led health and wellbeing programs in RL communities can positively impact both health behavior, such as increased physical activity or nutrition, and health status, such as lower blood pressure. The study quality was modest to very good, but only one study was deemed not to have a high risk of bias. Peers are generally cost-effective, more accessible, and relatable leaders for health interventions that can still produce impactful changes. Future studies are needed to better understand how to sustain promising interventions.
format	article
author	Lilian Barras Maike Neuhaus Elizabeth V. Cyarto Natasha Reid
author_facet	Lilian Barras Maike Neuhaus Elizabeth V. Cyarto Natasha Reid
author_sort	Lilian Barras
title	Effectiveness of Peer-Led Wellbeing Interventions in Retirement Living: A Systematic Review
title_short	Effectiveness of Peer-Led Wellbeing Interventions in Retirement Living: A Systematic Review
title_full	Effectiveness of Peer-Led Wellbeing Interventions in Retirement Living: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr	Effectiveness of Peer-Led Wellbeing Interventions in Retirement Living: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed	Effectiveness of Peer-Led Wellbeing Interventions in Retirement Living: A Systematic Review
title_sort	effectiveness of peer-led wellbeing interventions in retirement living: a systematic review
publisher	MDPI AG
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/28fb71f64f10466aac277c9b1cfd9439
work_keys_str_mv	AT lilianbarras effectivenessofpeerledwellbeinginterventionsinretirementlivingasystematicreview AT maikeneuhaus effectivenessofpeerledwellbeinginterventionsinretirementlivingasystematicreview AT elizabethvcyarto effectivenessofpeerledwellbeinginterventionsinretirementlivingasystematicreview AT natashareid effectivenessofpeerledwellbeinginterventionsinretirementlivingasystematicreview
_version_	1718432286236475392

Effectiveness of Peer-Led Wellbeing Interventions in Retirement Living: A Systematic Review

Ejemplares similares